Geisinger, Danville, PA.
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2024 Jan 11;2023:397-406. eCollection 2023.
With widespread electronic health record (EHR) adoption and improvements in health information interoperability in the United States, troves of data are available for knowledge discovery. Several data sharing programs and tools have been developed to support research activities, including efforts funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), EHR vendors, and other public- and private-sector entities. We surveyed 65 leading research institutions (77% response rate) about their use of and value derived from ten programs/tools, including NIH's Accrual to Clinical Trials, Epic Corporation's Cosmos, and the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics consortium. Most institutions participated in multiple programs/tools but reported relatively low usage (even when they participated, they frequently indicated that fewer than one individual/month benefitted from the platform to support research activities). Our findings suggest that investments in research data sharing have not yet achieved desired results.
随着电子健康记录 (EHR) 在全美范围内的广泛采用以及健康信息互操作性的提高,大量数据可用于知识发现。已经开发了多个数据共享计划和工具来支持研究活动,包括由美国国立卫生研究院 (NIH)、EHR 供应商和其他公共和私营部门实体资助的努力。我们对 65 家领先的研究机构(响应率为 77%)进行了调查,了解他们对包括 NIH 的临床试验注册、Epic 公司的 Cosmos 和观察性健康数据科学和信息学联盟在内的十个计划/工具的使用情况和从中获得的价值。大多数机构都参与了多个计划/工具,但报告的使用频率相对较低(即使参与了,他们也经常表示,每月只有不到一个人受益于该平台来支持研究活动)。我们的研究结果表明,对研究数据共享的投资尚未取得预期成果。