• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全基因组关联研究数据共享的伦理和实践挑战:eMERGE 联盟的经验。

Ethical and practical challenges of sharing data from genome-wide association studies: the eMERGE Consortium experience.

机构信息

Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Genome Res. 2011 Jul;21(7):1001-7. doi: 10.1101/gr.120329.111. Epub 2011 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1101/gr.120329.111
PMID:21632745
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3129243/
Abstract

In 2007, the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) established the Electronic MEdical Records and GEnomics (eMERGE) Consortium (www.gwas.net) to develop, disseminate, and apply approaches to research that combine DNA biorepositories with electronic medical record (EMR) systems for large-scale, high-throughput genetic research. One of the major ethical and administrative challenges for the eMERGE Consortium has been complying with existing data-sharing policies. This paper discusses the challenges of sharing genomic data linked to health information in the electronic medical record (EMR) and explores the issues as they relate to sharing both within a large consortium and in compliance with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) data-sharing policy. We use the eMERGE Consortium experience to explore data-sharing challenges from the perspective of multiple stakeholders (i.e., research participants, investigators, and research institutions), provide recommendations for researchers and institutions, and call for clearer guidance from the NIH regarding ethical implementation of its data-sharing policy.

摘要

2007 年,美国国立人类基因组研究所(NHGRI)成立了电子医疗记录和基因组学(eMERGE)联盟(www.gwas.net),旨在开发、传播和应用将 DNA 生物库与电子病历(EMR)系统相结合的方法,以进行大规模、高通量的遗传研究。eMERGE 联盟面临的主要伦理和管理挑战之一是遵守现有的数据共享政策。本文讨论了在电子病历(EMR)中共享与健康信息相关的基因组数据所面临的挑战,并探讨了在大型联盟内部以及遵守美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)数据共享政策的情况下共享这些数据所涉及的问题。我们利用 eMERGE 联盟的经验,从多个利益相关者(即研究参与者、研究人员和研究机构)的角度探讨数据共享挑战,为研究人员和机构提供建议,并呼吁 NIH 就其数据共享政策的伦理实施提供更明确的指导。

相似文献

1
Ethical and practical challenges of sharing data from genome-wide association studies: the eMERGE Consortium experience.全基因组关联研究数据共享的伦理和实践挑战:eMERGE 联盟的经验。
Genome Res. 2011 Jul;21(7):1001-7. doi: 10.1101/gr.120329.111. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
2
Confronting real time ethical, legal, and social issues in the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Consortium.应对电子病历与基因组学(eMERGE)联盟中的实时伦理、法律和社会问题。
Genet Med. 2010 Oct;12(10):616-20. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181efdbd0.
3
The eMERGE Network: a consortium of biorepositories linked to electronic medical records data for conducting genomic studies.eMERGE 网络:一个由生物库组成的联盟,与电子病历数据相关联,用于进行基因组研究。
BMC Med Genomics. 2011 Jan 26;4:13. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-4-13.
4
Conducting a large, multi-site survey about patients' views on broad consent: challenges and solutions.开展一项关于患者对广泛同意看法的大型多地点调查:挑战与解决方案。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Nov 24;16(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0263-7.
5
The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network: past, present, and future.电子病历与基因组学(eMERGE)网络:过去、现在和未来。
Genet Med. 2013 Oct;15(10):761-71. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.72. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
6
Development of a Genomic Data Flow Framework: Results of a Survey Administered to NIH-NHGRI IGNITE and eMERGE Consortia Participants.基因组数据流框架的开发:对美国国立卫生研究院国家人类基因组研究所IGNITE和eMERGE联盟参与者进行的一项调查结果
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020 Mar 4;2019:363-370. eCollection 2019.
7
Pitfalls of merging GWAS data: lessons learned in the eMERGE network and quality control procedures to maintain high data quality.GWAS 数据合并的陷阱:eMERGE 网络中的经验教训和质量控制程序,以保持高质量的数据。
Genet Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;35(8):887-98. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20639.
8
The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and Principles for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project.百慕大三角:人类基因组计划历史中数据共享的语用学、政策与原则
J Hist Biol. 2018 Dec;51(4):693-805. doi: 10.1007/s10739-018-9538-7.
9
Stakeholder engagement: a key component of integrating genomic information into electronic health records.利益相关者的参与:将基因组信息整合到电子健康记录中的关键组成部分。
Genet Med. 2013 Oct;15(10):792-801. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.127. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
10
Responsible, practical genomic data sharing that accelerates research.负责任、实用的基因组数据共享,加速研究。
Nat Rev Genet. 2020 Oct;21(10):615-629. doi: 10.1038/s41576-020-0257-5. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical and regulatory requirements for conducting researcher-driven large-scale multinational genetic haematological studies: the INHERENT experience.开展研究者主导的大规模跨国遗传性血液学研究的伦理和监管要求:INHERENT研究经验
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Aug 5;23(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01375-z.
2
Preferences on Governance Models for Mental Health Data: Qualitative Study With Young People.青少年对心理健康数据治理模式的偏好:一项定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Apr 23;8:e50368. doi: 10.2196/50368.
3
Public attitudes towards genomic data sharing: results from a provincial online survey in Canada.公众对基因组数据共享的态度:加拿大某省在线调查结果
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Oct 7;24(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00967-0.
4
Enhancing collaborative neuroimaging research: introducing COINSTAC Vaults for federated analysis and reproducibility.加强协作神经影像学研究:引入用于联合分析和可重复性的COINSTAC Vaults
Front Neuroinform. 2023 Jun 19;17:1207721. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2023.1207721. eCollection 2023.
5
An Overview of Methods and Exemplars of the Use of Mendelian Randomisation in Nutritional Research.孟德尔随机化在营养研究中应用的方法和范例概述。
Nutrients. 2022 Aug 19;14(16):3408. doi: 10.3390/nu14163408.
6
Considerations for an integrated population health databank in Africa: lessons from global best practices.非洲综合人口健康数据库的考量:全球最佳实践的经验教训
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Aug 23;6:214. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17000.1. eCollection 2021.
7
Researcher Perspectives on Data Sharing in Deep Brain Stimulation.研究人员对脑深部刺激数据共享的看法。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Dec 17;14:578687. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.578687. eCollection 2020.
8
Examination and diagnosis of electronic patient records and their associated ethics: a scoping literature review.电子病历的检查与诊断及其相关伦理:一项范围界定文献综述
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Aug 24;21(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00514-1.
9
Toward a Standardized Strategy of Clinical Metabolomics for the Advancement of Precision Medicine.迈向精准医学发展的临床代谢组学标准化策略。
Metabolites. 2020 Jan 29;10(2):51. doi: 10.3390/metabo10020051.
10
Sharing longitudinal, non-biological birth cohort data: a cross-sectional analysis of parent consent preferences.分享纵向、非生物出生队列数据:父母同意偏好的横断面分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Nov 12;18(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0683-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project (PMRP): design, methods and recruitment for a large population-based biobank.马什菲尔德诊所个性化医学研究项目(PMRP):基于大规模人群的生物样本库的设计、方法与招募
Per Med. 2005 Mar;2(1):49-79. doi: 10.1517/17410541.2.1.49.
2
Study newsletters, community and ethics advisory boards, and focus group discussions provide ongoing feedback for a large biobank.研究通讯、社区和伦理咨询委员会以及焦点小组讨论为大型生物库提供持续的反馈。
Am J Med Genet A. 2011 Apr;155A(4):737-41. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33896. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
3
The eMERGE Network: a consortium of biorepositories linked to electronic medical records data for conducting genomic studies.eMERGE 网络:一个由生物库组成的联盟,与电子病历数据相关联,用于进行基因组研究。
BMC Med Genomics. 2011 Jan 26;4:13. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-4-13.
4
Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.研究伦理。研究实践与参与者偏好:日益扩大的差距。
Science. 2011 Jan 21;331(6015):287-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1199000.
5
Never too old for anonymity: a statistical standard for demographic data sharing via the HIPAA Privacy Rule.永远不要因为年龄而放弃匿名:通过 HIPAA 隐私规则共享人口统计数据的统计标准。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jan-Feb;18(1):3-10. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004622.
6
The paradoxical problem with multiple-IRB review.多机构审查委员会审查中自相矛盾的问题。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 21;363(17):1591-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1005101. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
7
Glad you asked: participants' opinions of re-consent for dbGap data submission.很高兴你提出了这个问题:参与者对重新同意提交dbGap数据的看法。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Sep;5(3):9-16. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.9.
8
Leveraging informatics for genetic studies: use of the electronic medical record to enable a genome-wide association study of peripheral arterial disease.利用信息学进行遗传研究:利用电子病历进行外周动脉疾病的全基因组关联研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Sep-Oct;17(5):568-74. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004366.
9
Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing.公众和生物样本库参与者对基因研究参与和数据共享的态度。
Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(6):368-77. doi: 10.1159/000276767. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
10
Confronting real time ethical, legal, and social issues in the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Consortium.应对电子病历与基因组学(eMERGE)联盟中的实时伦理、法律和社会问题。
Genet Med. 2010 Oct;12(10):616-20. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181efdbd0.