Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, and the Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, and Addiction Medical Services, Onalaska, Wisconsin; the Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, and the Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah; and the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar 1;143(3):403-410. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005510. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
Although naltrexone is an evidence-based medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), few data are available with use in pregnancy. Our objective was to assess outcomes of pregnant individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) taking naltrexone compared with those taking methadone or buprenorphine.
We undertook a systematic review using electronic database search (PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo), conference proceedings, and trial registries including ClinicalTrials.gov .
We conducted an electronic search of research articles through May 2023 for randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort, and retrospective cohort studies of naltrexone (oral, implant, or extended release) compared with methadone or buprenorphine (sublingual or extended release) among pregnant individuals with OUD. After double review of all articles, we abstracted obstetric (primary outcome: gestational age at delivery), neonatal (primary outcome: neonatal abstinence syndrome [NAS]), and substance use outcomes.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Five studies met eligibility criteria; four were retrospective cohort studies, and one was a prospective cohort study. Four studies included data on gestational age at delivery (weeks) with no difference detected between the two groups in any study (mean difference ranging -0.20, 95% CI, -1.49-1.09 to 0.8, 95% CI, -0.15 to 1.75). Three studies included data on NAS with all studies detecting a lower risk in the naltrexone group compared with methadone or buprenorphine (relative risk ranging from 0.08, 95% CI, 0.01-1.16 to 0.15, 95% CI, 0.06-0.36). Most studies (four of five) had a moderate or high potential for selection bias primarily driven by small sample size and lack of controlling for confounders.
Although the evidence base is limited, available data suggest that naltrexone use in pregnancy is a reasonable MOUD option with reassuring perinatal outcomes. To enhance confidence in this conclusion and to assess substance use outcomes, further comparative studies of pregnant people with OUD taking naltrexone and other MOUD types are needed.
PROSPERO, 42017074249.
尽管纳曲酮是一种治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)的循证药物,但关于其在妊娠期间使用的数据却很少。我们的目的是评估与使用美沙酮或丁丙诺啡相比,阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)孕妇使用纳曲酮的结局。
我们通过电子数据库搜索(PubMed、CINAHL、EMBASE、PsycInfo)、会议记录和试验登记处(包括 ClinicalTrials.gov)进行了系统评价。
我们对截至 2023 年 5 月的研究文章进行了电子搜索,以确定随机对照试验、前瞻性队列和回顾性队列研究,这些研究比较了纳曲酮(口服、植入或缓释)与美沙酮或丁丙诺啡(舌下或缓释)在 OUD 孕妇中的使用。在对所有文章进行双重审查后,我们提取了产科(主要结局:分娩时的孕龄)、新生儿(主要结局:新生儿戒断综合征 [NAS])和物质使用结局。
列表、整合和结果:五项研究符合入选标准;四项为回顾性队列研究,一项为前瞻性队列研究。四项研究报告了分娩时的孕龄(周)数据,在任何一项研究中,两组之间均未发现差异(平均差值范围为-0.20,95%CI,-1.49-1.09 至 0.8,95%CI,-0.15-1.75)。三项研究报告了 NAS 数据,所有研究均发现纳曲酮组的风险低于美沙酮或丁丙诺啡组(相对风险范围为 0.08,95%CI,0.01-1.16 至 0.15,95%CI,0.06-0.36)。大多数研究(五项中的四项)存在中度或高度选择偏倚的潜在风险,主要原因是样本量小且缺乏对混杂因素的控制。
尽管证据基础有限,但现有数据表明,纳曲酮在妊娠期间的使用是一种合理的 MOUD 选择,具有令人安心的围产期结局。为了增强对这一结论的信心,并评估物质使用结局,需要进一步对使用纳曲酮和其他 MOUD 类型的 OUD 孕妇进行比较研究。
PROSPERO,42017074249。