Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, TN.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, TN.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan;222(1):83.e1-83.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.037. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
The mainstay of the management of opioid use disorder in pregnancy is with methadone or buprenorphine medication-assisted treatment. Methadone and buprenorphine are opioid agonist drugs. Naltrexone, an opioid antagonist, is also a medication-assisted treatment option; however, to date, only a few retrospective studies have reported its use in pregnancy.
Our study objective was to evaluate prospectively obstetric and newborn outcomes and the maternal/fetal effects of the use of naltrexone as a medication-assisted treatment in pregnant patients with opioid use disorder.
We performed a prospective cohort study collecting data on all pregnant women who were treated with naltrexone medication-assisted treatment compared with pregnant women who were treated with methadone or buprenorphine medication-assisted treatment. Based on a sample size calculation, it was determined that for a power of 90, a minimum of 160 study participants (80 in each group) was needed with an alpha of .01 and an expected 60% rate of newborn infants who were treated for neonatal abstinence syndrome in the methadone or buprenorphine medication-assisted treatment group compared with a 30% rate in the naltrexone medication-assisted treatment group. In a random subset of 20 maternal/newborn dyads, blood levels for naltrexone and 6-beta-naltrexol (an active metabolite) were analyzed at delivery.
A total of 230 patients were studied: 121 patients with naltrexone medication-assisted treatment compared with 109 patients with methadone or buprenorphine medication-assisted treatment. No differences between groups were seen regarding demographics, the use of comedications/drugs, or obstetric outcomes. For newborn outcomes, the rate of neonatal abstinence syndrome in neonates >34 weeks gestation was significantly lower in the naltrexone medication-assisted treatment group (10/119 [8.4%] vs 79/105 [75.2%]; P<.0001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the only significant factor for the rate of neonatal abstinence syndrome was the form of medication-assisted treatment. Of 87 patients who received naltrexone up to delivery, no neonates experienced symptoms of neonatal abstinence syndrome. No maternal relapses occurred in the 7-day no-treatment window before the initiation of naltrexone therapy. No cases of spontaneous abortion or stillbirth occurred in either group. In 64 patients who started naltrexone therapy at ≥24 weeks gestation, no changes were seen in the fetal heart monitor tracing with drug initiation. The incidence of birth anomalies was no different between the groups. Umbilical cord blood and maternal levels for naltrexone and 6-beta-naltrexol matched; no levels were elevated, and values were undetected if naltrexone was discontinued >60 hours before delivery.
These study data demonstrate that, in pregnant women who choose to completely detoxify off opioid drugs during gestation, naltrexone, as a continued form of medication-assisted treatment, is a viable option for some pregnant patients who experience opioid use disorder. Naltrexone crosses the placenta, and maternal and fetal levels are concordant. Because naltrexone clears quickly from the maternal circulation, this rapid clearance needs to be addressed with patients. This is important because maternal relapse could occur in a short time-period if the oral drug is discontinued without the knowledge of their healthcare providers. Nonetheless, the drug is well-tolerated by both mother and fetus, and newborn infants do not experience symptoms of neonatal abstinence syndrome if naltrexone medication-assisted treatment is maintained to delivery.
治疗妊娠合并阿片类药物使用障碍的主要方法是使用美沙酮或丁丙诺啡药物辅助治疗。美沙酮和丁丙诺啡是阿片类激动剂药物。纳曲酮,一种阿片类拮抗剂,也是一种药物辅助治疗选择;然而,迄今为止,只有少数回顾性研究报告了其在妊娠中的应用。
我们的研究目的是前瞻性评估纳曲酮作为药物辅助治疗在妊娠合并阿片类药物使用障碍患者中的产科和新生儿结局以及母婴/胎儿的影响。
我们进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,收集了所有接受纳曲酮药物辅助治疗的孕妇的数据,并与接受美沙酮或丁丙诺啡药物辅助治疗的孕妇进行了比较。根据样本量计算,为了达到 90%的功率,需要至少 160 名研究参与者(每组 80 名),α 值为.01,预计美沙酮或丁丙诺啡药物辅助治疗组中有 60%的新生儿需要治疗新生儿戒断综合征,而纳曲酮药物辅助治疗组中有 30%的新生儿需要治疗。在 20 对母婴/新生儿的随机亚组中,在分娩时分析纳曲酮和 6-β-纳曲醇(一种活性代谢物)的血液水平。
共有 230 名患者接受了研究:121 名患者接受了纳曲酮药物辅助治疗,109 名患者接受了美沙酮或丁丙诺啡药物辅助治疗。两组在人口统计学、联合用药/药物使用或产科结局方面没有差异。对于新生儿结局,在胎龄>34 周的新生儿中,纳曲酮药物辅助治疗组的新生儿戒断综合征发生率显著较低(119 例中的 10 例[8.4%] vs. 105 例中的 79 例[75.2%];P<.0001)。多变量分析表明,新生儿戒断综合征发生率的唯一显著因素是药物辅助治疗的形式。在 87 名接受纳曲酮治疗直至分娩的患者中,没有新生儿出现新生儿戒断综合征的症状。在开始纳曲酮治疗前的 7 天无治疗窗口期,没有产妇复发。两组均未发生自然流产或死产。在≥24 周开始纳曲酮治疗的 64 名患者中,药物开始时胎儿胎心监护图没有变化。两组的出生缺陷发生率没有差异。脐带血和产妇的纳曲酮和 6-β-纳曲醇水平相匹配;如果纳曲酮在分娩前>60 小时停止使用,没有检测到纳曲酮水平升高或未检测到。
这些研究数据表明,对于选择在妊娠期间完全戒除阿片类药物的孕妇,如果选择继续使用药物辅助治疗,纳曲酮是一些患有阿片类药物使用障碍的孕妇的可行选择。纳曲酮可穿过胎盘,母胎水平一致。由于纳曲酮从母体循环中迅速清除,需要与患者讨论这一问题。这一点很重要,因为如果患者不知道其医疗服务提供者已停止使用口服药物,母体复发可能会在短时间内发生。尽管如此,该药物仍能被母亲和胎儿耐受,如果维持纳曲酮药物辅助治疗直至分娩,新生儿不会出现新生儿戒断综合征的症状。