Department of Psychology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):5947-5958. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02327-7. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
The flanker task (Eriksen & Eriksen, Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143-149, 1974) has been highly influential and widely used in studies of visual attention. Its simplicity has made it popular to include it in experimental software packages and online platforms. The spacing flanker task (SFT), in which the distance between the target and flankers varies, is useful for studying the distribution of attention across space as well as inhibitory control. Use of the SFT requires that the viewing environment (e.g., stimulus size and viewing distance) be controlled, which is a challenge for online delivery. We implement and evaluate an online version of the SFT that includes two calibration pretests to provide the necessary control. Test-retest and split-half reliability of the online version was compared with a laboratory version on measures of inhibitory control and measures of the distribution of attention across space. Analyses show that the online SFT is comparable to laboratory testing on all measures. Results also identify two measures with good test-retest reliability that hold promise for studying performance in the SFT: the mean flanker effect (ICC = 0.745) and RTs on incongruent trials across distances (ICC = 0.65-0.71).
侧抑制任务(Eriksen 和 Eriksen,《感知与心理物理学》,第 16(1)卷,第 143-149 页,1974 年)具有高度影响力和广泛的应用,在视觉注意力研究中得到了广泛应用。其简单性使其成为实验软件包和在线平台中很受欢迎的选择。间距侧抑制任务(SFT)中,目标和侧抑制之间的距离会变化,这对于研究注意力在空间中的分布以及抑制控制非常有用。使用 SFT 需要控制观看环境(例如,刺激大小和观看距离),这对于在线交付来说是一个挑战。我们实现并评估了 SFT 的在线版本,其中包括两个校准预测试,以提供必要的控制。在线版本的重测和半分可靠性与实验室版本的抑制控制和注意力在空间中的分布测量进行了比较。分析表明,在线 SFT 在所有测量上与实验室测试相当。结果还确定了两个具有良好重测可靠性的测量指标,这些指标在研究 SFT 中的表现具有潜力:平均侧抑制效应(ICC=0.745)和距离上不一致试验的 RT(ICC=0.65-0.71)。