Smits Marion, Rockall Andrea, Constantinescu Stefan N, Sardanelli Francesco, Martí-Bonmatí Luis
Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Medical Delta, Delft, The Netherlands.
Insights Imaging. 2024 Jan 17;15(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01596-2.
At the European Society of Radiology (ESR), we strive to provide evidence for radiological practices that improve patient outcomes and have a societal impact. Successful translation of radiological research into clinical practice requires multiple factors including tailored methodology, a multidisciplinary approach aiming beyond technical validation, and a focus on unmet clinical needs. Low levels of evidence are a threat to radiology, resulting in low visibility and credibility. Here, we provide the background and rationale for the thematic series Translating radiological research into practice-from discovery to clinical impact, inviting authors to describe their processes of achieving clinically impactful radiological research. We describe the challenges unique to radiological research. Additionally, a survey was sent to non-radiological clinical societies. The majority of respondents (6/11) were in the field of gastrointestinal/abdominal medicine. The implementation of CT/MRI techniques for disease characterisation, detection and staging of cancer, and treatment planning and radiological interventions were mentioned as the most important radiological developments in the past years. The perception was that patients are substantially unaware of the impact of these developments. Unmet clinical needs were mostly early diagnosis and staging of cancer, microstructural/functional assessment of tissues and organs, and implant assessment. All but one respondent considered radiology important for research in their discipline, but five indicated that radiology is currently not involved in their research. Radiology research holds the potential for being transformative to medical practice. It is our responsibility to take the lead in studies including radiology and strive towards the highest levels of evidence.Critical relevance statement For radiological research to make a clinical and societal impact, radiologists should take the lead in radiological studies, go beyond the assessment of technical feasibility and diagnostic accuracy, and-in a multidisciplinary approach-address clinical unmet needs.Key points• Multiple factors are essential for radiological research to make a clinical and societal impact.• Radiological research needs to go beyond diagnostic accuracy and address unmet clinical needs.• Radiologists should take the lead in radiological studies with a multidisciplinary approach.
在欧洲放射学会(ESR),我们致力于为改善患者预后并产生社会影响的放射学实践提供证据。将放射学研究成功转化为临床实践需要多个因素,包括量身定制的方法、超越技术验证的多学科方法以及关注未满足的临床需求。低水平的证据对放射学构成威胁,导致其知名度和可信度较低。在此,我们提供了“将放射学研究转化为实践——从发现到临床影响”专题系列的背景和基本原理,邀请作者描述他们实现具有临床影响力的放射学研究的过程。我们描述了放射学研究特有的挑战。此外,我们向非放射学临床学会发送了一份调查问卷。大多数受访者(11人中的6人)来自胃肠/腹部医学领域。CT/MRI技术在疾病特征描述、癌症检测与分期、治疗规划以及放射学干预方面的应用被提及为过去几年最重要的放射学进展。人们认为患者基本上没有意识到这些进展的影响。未满足的临床需求主要是癌症的早期诊断和分期、组织和器官的微观结构/功能评估以及植入物评估。除一人外,所有受访者都认为放射学对其学科的研究很重要,但有五人表示放射学目前未参与他们的研究。放射学研究具有变革医疗实践的潜力。我们有责任在包括放射学的研究中发挥带头作用,并朝着最高水平的证据努力。关键相关性声明为使放射学研究产生临床和社会影响,放射科医生应在放射学研究中发挥带头作用,超越对技术可行性和诊断准确性的评估,并以多学科方法满足未满足的临床需求。要点• 多个因素对于放射学研究产生临床和社会影响至关重要。• 放射学研究需要超越诊断准确性,满足未满足的临床需求。• 放射科医生应通过多学科方法在放射学研究中发挥带头作用。