Aksamitiene Edita, Heffelfinger Ryan N, Hoek Jan B, Pribitkin Edmund deAzevedo
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut St., 6Th floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Present address: Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 405 N. Mathews Ave | M/C 251, Room 4357, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Biol Proced Online. 2024 Jan 17;26(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12575-023-00227-w.
Some of the most complex surgical interventions to treat trauma and cancer include the use of locoregional pedicled and free autologous tissue transfer flaps. While the techniques used for these reconstructive surgery procedures have improved over time, flap complications and even failure remain a significant clinical challenge. Animal models are useful in studying the pathophysiology of ischemic flaps, but when repeatability is a primary focus of a study, conventional in-vivo designs, where one randomized subset of animals serves as a treatment group while a second subset serves as a control, are at a disadvantage instigated by greater subject-to-subject variability. Our goal was to provide a step-by-step methodological protocol for creating an alternative standardized, more economical, and transferable pre-clinical animal research model of excisional full-thickness wound healing following a simulated autologous tissue transfer which includes the primary ischemia, reperfusion, and secondary ischemia events with the latter mimicking flap salvage procedure.
Unlike in the most frequently used classical unilateral McFarlane's caudally based dorsal random pattern skin flap model, in the herein described bilateral epigastric fasciocutaneous advancement flap (BEFAF) model, one flap heals under normal and a contralateral flap-under perturbed conditions or both flaps heal under conditions that vary by one within-subjects factor. We discuss the advantages and limitations of the proposed experimental approach and, as a part of model validation, provide the examples of its use in laboratory rat (Rattus norvegicus) axial pattern flap healing studies.
This technically challenging but feasible reconstructive surgery model eliminates inter-subject variability, while concomitantly minimizing the number of animals needed to achieve adequate statistical power. BEFAFs may be used to investigate the spatiotemporal cellular and molecular responses to complex tissue injury, interventions simulating clinically relevant flap complications (e.g., vascular thrombosis) as well as prophylactic, therapeutic or surgical treatment (e.g., flap delay) strategies in the presence or absence of confounding risk factors (e.g., substance abuse, irradiation, diabetes) or favorable wound-healing promoting activities (e.g., exercise). Detailed visual instructions in BEFAF protocol may serve as an aid for teaching medical or academic researchers basic vascular microsurgery techniques that focus on precision, tremor management and magnification.
一些治疗创伤和癌症的最复杂外科手术包括使用局部带蒂和游离自体组织转移皮瓣。虽然随着时间的推移,这些重建手术所使用的技术有所改进,但皮瓣并发症甚至失败仍然是一个重大的临床挑战。动物模型有助于研究缺血皮瓣的病理生理学,但当研究的主要重点是可重复性时,传统的体内设计(其中一组随机动物作为治疗组,另一组作为对照组)会因个体间差异较大而处于劣势。我们的目标是提供一个逐步的方法学方案,用于创建一种替代的标准化、更经济且可转移的临床前动物研究模型,该模型模拟自体组织转移后全层切除伤口愈合,包括原发性缺血、再灌注和继发性缺血事件,后者模拟皮瓣挽救手术。
与最常用的经典单侧麦克法兰尾部基底背侧随意型皮瓣模型不同,在本文所述的双侧腹壁筋膜皮瓣推进模型(BEFAF)中,一个皮瓣在正常条件下愈合,对侧皮瓣在受干扰条件下愈合,或者两个皮瓣在一个受试者内因素不同的条件下愈合。我们讨论了所提出的实验方法的优点和局限性,并作为模型验证的一部分,提供了其在实验室大鼠(褐家鼠)轴型皮瓣愈合研究中的应用示例。
这个技术上具有挑战性但可行的重建手术模型消除了个体间差异,同时将获得足够统计效力所需的动物数量降至最低。BEFAF可用于研究对复杂组织损伤的时空细胞和分子反应、模拟临床相关皮瓣并发症(如血管血栓形成)的干预措施以及在存在或不存在混杂风险因素(如药物滥用、辐射、糖尿病)或有利的伤口愈合促进活动(如运动)的情况下的预防、治疗或手术治疗(如皮瓣延迟)策略。BEFAF方案中的详细视觉指导可作为教学辅助,帮助医学或学术研究人员掌握专注于精度、震颤管理和放大的基本血管显微手术技术。