Suppr超能文献

使用非处方漱口水作为成人菌斑性牙龈炎个体口腔预防措施的附加手段:一项双盲、平行、随机对照试验。

Use of over-the-counter mouthwashes as an additional measure in individual oral prophylaxis on adults with plaque-induced gingivitis: a double-blind, parallel, randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences and Stomatology (DISCO), Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, 60126, Italy.

Research Unit UR 4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, Lyon, 69008, France.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jan 16;24(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03779-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Plaque-induced gingivitis is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by complete reversibility of tissue damage once the periodontal biofilm has been disorganised. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two commercially available mouthwashes (MWs) versus a chlorhexidine (CHX) 0.12% MW in reducing gingival bleeding (GB) in adults with plaque-induced gingivitis.

METHODS

The present study was a double-blind, parallel, randomized controlled trial involving 6492 gingival sites (i.e. 39 subjects × 28 teeth × 6 sites/tooth) aged 18-75 years. During a 2-week period, subjects were randomized to receive MWs: a control CHX 0.12% MW (group C, 1818 sites); a MW test containing CHX 0.09% + Citrox®/P complex (group CX, 2628 sites); a MW test based on natural compounds (group P, 2016 sites). GB was assessed at the inclusion visit (T) and after 2 weeks of MW use (T). Analyses of GB were compared between groups and then restricted to subjects with bleeding sites between 10 and 30% (moderate gingivitis) or ≥ 30% (severe gingivitis) at T. Pairwise comparisons were made between groups and logistic regression was used to identify correlates of GB (T).

RESULTS

For total bleeding site analysis, GB reduction between T and T ranged from 23% (C), 26% (CX) and 36% (P), respectively (all p < 0.05). Multiple comparison between groups showed that group C was significantly less effective (p < 0.05) than groups CX and P. Splitting the analysis, in patients with severe gingivitis (≥ 30% bleeding sites at T), all MWs had a positive effect on GB with a reduction at T of 36% (C), 33% (CX) and 42% (P), respectively. While GB reduction between T and T, was significant for all groups, the comparison among groups showed no significant difference between group C and CX, whereas the improvement was significant for group P. On the other hand, in adults with moderate gingivitis (< 30% bleeding sites at T), only CX and P had a positive effect on GB reduction at T(9% in CX and 2% in P, respectively), although the differences between the three groups were not significant.

CONCLUSION

The daily use of MWs with natural components (groups P and CX) for 2 weeks should be considered positively as an adjunct to individual oral prophylaxis to reduce GB compared to the control MW containing CHX 0.12% (group C) in healthy adults with plaque-induced gingivitis. For subjects with severe gingivitis, it is advisable to first use natural MW (P) and then MW based on CHX 0.09% with natural components (CX), compared to MW with CHX 0.12% (C). For adults with moderate gingivitis, P and CX can be advisable, even if no definitive recommendations can be drawn.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12622000215729, 07/02/2022.

摘要

背景

菌斑性牙龈炎是一种慢性炎症性疾病,其特征是一旦牙周生物膜被打乱,组织损伤即可完全逆转。本研究旨在评估两种市售漱口水(MWs)与洗必泰(CHX)0.12% MW 在减少患有菌斑性牙龈炎的成年人牙龈出血(GB)方面的疗效。

方法

本研究为双盲、平行、随机对照试验,共纳入 6492 个牙龈部位(即 39 名受试者×28 颗牙齿×6 个部位/牙齿),年龄为 18-75 岁。在 2 周的时间内,受试者被随机分配接受 MWs:对照 CHX 0.12% MW(组 C,1818 个部位);含有 CHX 0.09%+Citrox®/P 复合物的 MW 测试(组 CX,2628 个部位);基于天然化合物的 MW 测试(组 P,2016 个部位)。在纳入时(T)和使用 MW 2 周后(T)评估 GB。对各组间的 GB 进行分析,然后限制在 T 时出血部位为 10-30%(中度牙龈炎)或≥30%(重度牙龈炎)的受试者中进行分析。对各组进行两两比较,并采用逻辑回归确定 GB 的相关性(T)。

结果

对于总出血部位分析,T 至 T 之间的 GB 减少范围分别为 23%(C)、26%(CX)和 36%(P)(均 p<0.05)。组间多重比较显示,组 C 的效果明显低于组 CX 和 P(p<0.05)。分组分析显示,在患有重度牙龈炎(T 时出血部位≥30%)的患者中,所有 MWs 对 GB 均有积极作用,T 时的减少率分别为 36%(C)、33%(CX)和 42%(P)。虽然所有组在 T 至 T 之间的 GB 减少均有统计学意义,但组间比较显示组 C 与 CX 之间无显著差异,而组 P 的改善则具有统计学意义。另一方面,在患有中度牙龈炎(T 时出血部位<30%)的成年人中,只有 CX 和 P 对 T 时的 GB 减少有积极作用(分别为 CX 中的 9%和 P 中的 2%),尽管三组之间的差异不显著。

结论

与含有 0.12% CHX 的对照 MW(组 C)相比,健康成年人患有菌斑性牙龈炎时,每天使用含有天然成分的 MWs(组 P 和 CX)进行 2 周的治疗,可能有助于减少牙龈出血。对于患有重度牙龈炎的患者,建议首先使用天然 MW(P),然后使用含有 0.09% CHX 的天然成分(CX)的 MW,而不是含有 0.12% CHX 的 MW(C)。对于患有中度牙龈炎的成年人,即使不能得出明确的建议,P 和 CX 也是可以考虑的。

试验注册

ACTRN12622000215729,2022 年 7 月 2 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f688/10790383/b3782a11fa2d/12903_2023_3779_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验