Division of Cardiac Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 17;18(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01794-6.
Online health resources are important for patients seeking perioperative information on robotic cardiac and thoracic surgery. The value of the resources depends on their readability, accuracy, content, quality, and suitability for patient use. We systematically assess current online health information on robotic cardiac and thoracic surgery. Systematic online searches were performed to identify websites discussing robotic cardiac and thoracic surgery. For each website, readability was measured by nine standardized tests, and accuracy and content were assessed by an independent panel of two robotic cardiothoracic surgeons. Quality and suitability of websites were evaluated using the DISCERN and Suitability Assessment of Materials tools, respectively. A total of 220 websites (120 cardiac, and 100 thoracic) were evaluated. Both robotic cardiac and thoracic surgery websites were very difficult to read with mean readability scores of 13.8 and 14.0 (p = 0.97), respectively, requiring at least 13 years of education to be comprehended. Both robotic cardiac and thoracic surgery websites had similar accuracy, amount of content, quality, and suitability (p > 0.05). On multivariable regression, academic websites [Exp (B)], 2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-3.16; P < 0.001), and websites with higher amount of content [Exp (B)],1.73; 95% CI, 1.24-2.41; P < 0.001) were associated with higher accuracy. There was no association between readability of websites and accuracy [Exp (B)], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.90-1.21; P = 0.57). Online information on robotic cardiac and thoracic surgery websites overestimate patients' understanding and require at least 13 years of education to be comprehended. As website accuracy is not associated with ease of reading, the readability of online resources can be improved without compromising accuracy.
在线健康资源对于寻求机器人心脏和胸部手术围手术期信息的患者非常重要。资源的价值取决于其可读性、准确性、内容、质量和适合患者使用的程度。我们系统地评估了当前关于机器人心脏和胸部手术的在线健康信息。系统地在线搜索以确定讨论机器人心脏和胸部手术的网站。对于每个网站,使用九个标准化测试来衡量可读性,并且由两名机器人心脏外科医生组成的独立小组评估准确性和内容。使用 DISCERN 和材料适宜性评估工具分别评估网站的质量和适宜性。共评估了 220 个网站(120 个心脏,100 个胸部)。机器人心脏和胸部手术网站都非常难以阅读,平均可读性评分为 13.8 和 14.0(p=0.97),需要至少 13 年的教育才能理解。机器人心脏和胸部手术网站的准确性、内容量、质量和适宜性都相似(p>0.05)。在多变量回归中,学术网站[Exp(B)],2.25;95%置信区间[CI],1.60-3.16;P<0.001)和内容量较高的网站[Exp(B)],1.73;95%CI,1.24-2.41;P<0.001)与更高的准确性相关。网站的可读性与准确性之间没有关联[Exp(B)],1.04;95%CI,0.90-1.21;P=0.57)。机器人心脏和胸部手术网站的在线信息高估了患者的理解能力,并且需要至少 13 年的教育才能理解。由于网站准确性与阅读的容易程度无关,因此可以在不影响准确性的情况下提高在线资源的可读性。