Suppr超能文献

使用实时心血管磁共振成像评估 HFpEF 患者静息和运动应激时的心输出量。

Assessment of the cardiac output at rest and during exercise stress using real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in HFpEF-patients.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Germany.

German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Apr;40(4):853-862. doi: 10.1007/s10554-024-03054-6. Epub 2024 Jan 18.

Abstract

This methodological study aimed to validate the cardiac output (CO) measured by exercise-stress real-time phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). 68 patients with dyspnea on exertion (NYHA ≥ II) and echocardiographic signs of diastolic dysfunction underwent rest and exercise stress right heart catheterization (RHC) and CMR within 24 h. Patients were diagnosed as overt HFpEF (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥ 15mmHg at rest), masked HFpEF (PCWP ≥ 25mmHg during exercise stress but < 15mmHg at rest) and non-cardiac dyspnea. CO was calculated using RHC as the reference standard, and in CMR by the volumetric stroke volume, conventional phase-contrast and rest and stress real-time phase-contrast imaging. At rest, the CMR based CO showed good agreement with RHC with an ICC of 0.772 for conventional phase-contrast, and 0.872 for real-time phase-contrast measurements. During exercise stress, the agreement of real-time CMR and RHC was good with an ICC of 0.805. Real-time measurements underestimated the CO at rest (Bias:0.71 L/min) and during exercise stress (Bias:1.4 L/min). Patients with overt HFpEF had a significantly lower cardiac index compared to patients with masked HFpEF and with non-cardiac dyspnea during exercise stress, but not at rest. Real-time phase-contrast CO can be assessed with good agreement with the invasive reference standard at rest and during exercise stress. While moderate underestimation of the CO needs to be considered with non-invasive testing, the CO using real-time CMR provides useful clinical information and could help to avoid unnecessary invasive procedures in HFpEF patients.

摘要

这项方法学研究旨在验证心力衰竭和射血分数保留(HFpEF)患者运动负荷实时相位对比心血管磁共振成像(CMR)测量的心输出量(CO)。68 例因运动而呼吸困难(NYHA ≥ II)和超声心动图显示舒张功能障碍的患者在 24 小时内进行了静息和运动负荷右心导管检查(RHC)和 CMR。患者被诊断为显性 HFpEF(静息时肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)≥ 15mmHg)、隐匿性 HFpEF(运动负荷时 PCWP≥ 25mmHg,但静息时< 15mmHg)和非心源性呼吸困难。CO 通过 RHC 作为参考标准计算,并通过容积性 stroke volume、常规相位对比和静息和运动负荷实时相位对比成像在 CMR 中计算。在静息状态下,CMR 基于 CO 的测量与 RHC 具有良好的一致性,常规相位对比的 ICC 为 0.772,实时相位对比测量的 ICC 为 0.872。在运动负荷期间,实时 CMR 和 RHC 的一致性较好,ICC 为 0.805。实时测量在静息时(偏倚:0.71 L/min)和运动负荷时(偏倚:1.4 L/min)低估了 CO。显性 HFpEF 患者的心脏指数明显低于隐匿性 HFpEF 患者和非心源性呼吸困难患者在运动负荷时,但在静息时则不然。实时相位对比 CO 可以与静息和运动负荷的侵入性参考标准进行良好的评估。虽然在进行非侵入性检查时需要考虑 CO 的中度低估,但实时 CMR 提供的 CO 可提供有用的临床信息,并有助于避免 HFpEF 患者进行不必要的侵入性程序。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e16b/11052864/b346e5441cf2/10554_2024_3054_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验