Ciardiello Davide, Mauri Gianluca, Sartore-Bianchi Andrea, Siena Salvatore, Zampino Maria Giulia, Fazio Nicola, Cervantes Andres
Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy; IFOM ETS - The AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2024 Mar;124:102683. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102683. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
Despite recent molecular and immunological advancements, prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients remains poor. In this context, several retrospective and phase II studies suggested that after failure of an upfront anti-EGFR based regimen, a subset of patients can still benefit from further anti-EGFR blockade. Several translational studies involving circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis demonstrated that cancer clones harboring mutations driving anti-EGFR resistance, which can arise under anti-EGFR agents selective pressure, often decay after anti-EGFR discontinuation potentially restoring sensitivity to this therapeutic strategy. Accordingly, several retrospective analyses and a recent prospective trial demonstrated that ctDNA RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC patients are those benefitting the most from anti-EGFR rechallenge. Indeed, in molecularly selected patients, anti-EGFR rechallenge strategy achieved up to 30 % response rate, with a progression free survival longer than 4 months and an overall survival longer than 1 year, which favorably compared with other standard therapeutic options available for heavily pretreated patients. Anti-EGFR is also well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities compared to the upfront setting. However, several open questions remain to be addressed towards a broader applicability of anti-EGFR strategy in the everyday clinical practice such as the identification of the best rechallenge regimen, the right placement in mCRC therapeutic algorithm, the best ctDNA screening panel. In our systematic review, we revised available data from clinical trials assessing anti-EGFR rechallenge activity in chemo-refractory mCRC patients, discussing as well potential future scenarios and development to implement this therapeutic approach. Particularly, we discussed the role of ctDNA as a safe, timely and comprehensive tool to refine patient's selection and the therapeutic index of anti-EGFR rechallenge.
尽管最近在分子和免疫学方面取得了进展,但转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的预后仍然很差。在这种情况下,多项回顾性研究和II期研究表明,在基于抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的初始治疗方案失败后,一部分患者仍可从进一步的抗EGFR阻断治疗中获益。几项涉及循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)分析的转化研究表明,携带驱动抗EGFR耐药性突变的癌症克隆,可在抗EGFR药物的选择性压力下产生,在停用抗EGFR药物后通常会衰减,这可能会恢复对这种治疗策略的敏感性。因此,多项回顾性分析和最近的一项前瞻性试验表明,ctDNA中RAS和BRAF野生型的mCRC患者是从抗EGFR再挑战治疗中获益最大的人群。事实上,在经过分子筛选的患者中,抗EGFR再挑战策略的缓解率高达30%,无进展生存期超过4个月,总生存期超过1年,与其他针对经过大量预处理患者的标准治疗选择相比具有优势。与初始治疗相比,抗EGFR的耐受性也很好,没有意外的毒性。然而,为了使抗EGFR策略在日常临床实践中更广泛地应用,仍有几个悬而未决的问题需要解决,例如最佳再挑战方案的确定、在mCRC治疗算法中的正确位置、最佳ctDNA筛查组合。在我们的系统评价中,我们回顾了评估抗EGFR再挑战活性在化疗难治性mCRC患者中的临床试验的现有数据,并讨论了潜在的未来情况和实施这种治疗方法的发展。特别是,我们讨论了ctDNA作为一种安全、及时和全面的工具在优化患者选择和抗EGFR再挑战治疗指数方面的作用。