Theia Markerless Inc., Kingston, ON, Canada.
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
J Appl Biomech. 2024 Jan 18;40(2):129-137. doi: 10.1123/jab.2023-0069. Print 2024 Apr 1.
As markerless motion capture is increasingly used to measure 3-dimensional human pose, it is important to understand how markerless results can be interpreted alongside historical marker-based data and how they are impacted by clothing. We compared concurrent running kinematics and kinetics between marker-based and markerless motion capture, and between 2 markerless clothing conditions. Thirty adults ran on an instrumented treadmill wearing motion capture clothing while concurrent marker-based and markerless data were recorded, and ran a second time wearing athletic clothing (shorts and t-shirt) while markerless data were recorded. Differences calculated between the concurrent signals from both systems, and also between each participant's mean signals from both asynchronous clothing conditions were summarized across all participants using root mean square differences. Most kinematic and kinetic signals were visually consistent between systems and markerless clothing conditions. Between systems, joint center positions differed by 3 cm or less, sagittal plane joint angles differed by 5° or less, and frontal and transverse plane angles differed by 5° to 10°. Joint moments differed by 0.3 N·m/kg or less between systems. Differences were sensitive to segment coordinate system definitions, highlighting the effects of these definitions when comparing against historical data or other motion capture modalities.
随着无标记运动捕捉技术越来越多地用于测量三维人体姿势,了解如何将无标记结果与历史标记基础数据进行解释,以及它们如何受到服装的影响,这一点非常重要。我们比较了基于标记和无标记运动捕捉的同时跑步运动学和动力学,以及两种无标记服装条件。三十名成年人穿着运动捕捉服在仪器化跑步机上跑步,同时记录基于标记和无标记的数据,然后穿着运动服(短裤和 t 恤)跑步,同时记录无标记数据。使用均方根差,对来自两个系统的同时信号之间以及每个参与者在两个异步服装条件下的平均信号之间计算的差异进行了总结。在系统和无标记服装条件之间,大多数运动学和动力学信号在视觉上是一致的。在系统之间,关节中心位置的差异小于 3 厘米,矢状面关节角度的差异小于 5 度,额状面和横面角度的差异为 5 度至 10 度。关节力矩的差异小于 0.3 N·m/kg。差异对节段坐标系定义很敏感,当与历史数据或其他运动捕捉模式进行比较时,突出了这些定义的影响。