Scimemi G
Sci Total Environ. 1986 Nov 15;56:361-75. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(86)90341-4.
A cross comparison of environmental programmes of major International Organisations reveals a convergent tendency. A relatively small number of priority areas for action have been identified, in the domain of pollution prevention and control, natural resource management, and quality of life in human settlements. Policy development in each of the priority areas requires specific scientific research efforts. The dialogue between policy-makers and scientists raises some problem, relative, inter alia, to the independence of science and to the practical need to act before various environmental threats become irretrievable. A rational sharing of tasks between International Organisations could work towards greater effectiveness.
对主要国际组织的环境项目进行交叉比较，可发现一种趋同趋势。在污染预防与控制、自然资源管理以及人类住区生活质量领域，已确定了相对较少的优先行动领域。每个优先领域的政策制定都需要具体的科学研究工作。政策制定者与科学家之间的对话引发了一些问题，尤其是与科学的独立性以及在各种环境威胁变得无法挽回之前采取行动的实际需求相关的问题。国际组织之间合理分担任务有助于提高效率。
