• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适用于 2 至 4 岁儿童的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 和 -Y-5L 中文版和英文版在代理应答者中的心理测量性能比较。

Psychometric Performance Comparison of the Adapted versus Original Versions of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and -Y-5L in Proxy Respondents for 2- to 4-Year-Olds.

机构信息

Health Economics Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 4/207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia.

National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jun;42(Suppl 1):129-145. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01350-6. Epub 2024 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1007/s40273-024-01350-6
PMID:38238604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11169041/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Few preference-weighted instruments are available to measure health-related quality of life in young children (2-4 years of age). The EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L were recently modified for this purpose.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to test the psychometric properties of these adapted versions for use with parent proxies of children aged 2-4 years and to compare their performance with the original versions. It was hypothesised that the adapted instrument wording would result in improved psychometric performance.

METHODS

Survey data of children aged 2-4 years were obtained from the Australian Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison study. Distributional and psychometric properties tested included feasibility, convergence, distribution of level scores, ceiling effects, known-group validity (Cohen's D effect sizes for prespecified groups defined by the presence/absence of special healthcare needs [SHCNs]), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs]), and responsiveness (standardised response mean [SRM] effect sizes for changes in health). Level sum scores were used to provide summary outcomes. Supplementary analysis using utility scores (from the Swedish EQ-5D-Y-3L value set) were conducted for the adapted and original EQ-5D-Y-3L, and no value sets were available for the EQ-5D-Y-5L.

RESULTS

A total of 842 parents of children aged 2-4 years completed the survey. All instruments were easy to complete. There was strong convergence between the adapted and original EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L. The adapted EQ-5D-Y-3L and adapted EQ-5D-Y-5L showed more responses in the severe levels of the five EQ-5D-Y dimensions, particularly in the usual activity and mobility dimensions (EQ-5D-Y-5L: mobility level 1: adapted n = 478 [83%], original n = 253 [94%]; mobility level 4/5: adapted n = 17 [2.9%], original n = 4 [1.5%)]). The difference in the distribution of responses was more evident in children with SHCNs. Assessment of known-group validity showed a greater effect size for the adapted EQ-5D-Y-3L and adapted EQ-5D-Y-5L compared with the original instruments (EQ-5D-Y-5L: adapted Cohen's D = 1.01, original Cohen's D = 0.83) between children with and without SHCNs. The adapted EQ-5D-Y-3L and adapted EQ-5D-Y-5L showed improved reliability at 4-week follow-up, with improved ICCs (EQ-5D-Y-5L: adapted ICC = 0.83, original ICC = 0.44). The responsiveness of all instruments moved in the hypothesised direction for better or worse health at follow-up. Probability of superiority analysis showed little/no differences between the adapted and original EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L. Supplementary psychometric analysis of the adapted and original EQ-5D-Y-3L using utilities showed comparable findings with analyses using level sum scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest improved psychometric performance of the adapted version of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L in children aged 2-4 years compared with the original versions.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cd6/11169041/5838366e29b2/40273_2024_1350_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cd6/11169041/c92581c7fc76/40273_2024_1350_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cd6/11169041/5838366e29b2/40273_2024_1350_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cd6/11169041/c92581c7fc76/40273_2024_1350_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cd6/11169041/5838366e29b2/40273_2024_1350_Fig2_HTML.jpg
摘要

简介

目前仅有少数偏好加权工具可用于衡量 2-4 岁幼儿的健康相关生活质量。最近对 EQ-5D-Y-3L 和 EQ-5D-Y-5L 进行了修改以实现这一目标。

目的

本研究旨在测试这两种经过改编的版本在 2-4 岁儿童的父母代理使用中的心理测量性能,并与原始版本进行比较。假设改编后的仪器措辞将导致心理测量性能的提高。

方法

从澳大利亚儿科多仪器比较研究中获得了 2-4 岁儿童的调查数据。测试的分布和心理测量特性包括可行性、收敛性、水平得分分布、天花板效应、已知组有效性(根据特殊医疗需求 [SHCNs] 的存在/不存在定义的特定组的 Cohen's D 效应大小)、测试-再测试可靠性(ICC)和响应能力(健康变化的标准化反应均值 [SRM] 效应大小)。使用等级总和得分提供汇总结果。使用效用得分(来自瑞典 EQ-5D-Y-3L 值集)对经过改编和原始 EQ-5D-Y-3L 进行了补充分析,而 EQ-5D-Y-5L 则没有值集。

结果

共有 842 名 2-4 岁儿童的父母完成了调查。所有仪器都易于完成。改编后的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 和 EQ-5D-Y-5L 与原始 EQ-5D-Y-3L 和 EQ-5D-Y-5L 之间具有很强的收敛性。经过改编的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 和 EQ-5D-Y-5L 在五个 EQ-5D-Y 维度的严重程度上表现出更多的反应,特别是在日常活动和移动性维度上(EQ-5D-Y-5L:移动性水平 1:改编 n = 478 [83%],原始 n = 253 [94%];移动性水平 4/5:改编 n = 17 [2.9%],原始 n = 4 [1.5%])。在有 SHCNs 的儿童中,反应分布的差异更为明显。对已知组有效性的评估表明,与原始仪器相比,经过改编的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 和 EQ-5D-Y-5L 的效果更大(EQ-5D-Y-5L:改编后的 Cohen's D = 1.01,原始 Cohen's D = 0.83)在有和没有 SHCNs 的儿童之间。经过改编的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 和 EQ-5D-Y-5L 在 4 周随访时具有更好的可靠性,改进后的 ICC 更高(EQ-5D-Y-5L:改编后的 ICC = 0.83,原始 ICC = 0.44)。所有仪器的反应能力在随访时朝着更好或更差的健康方向发展。优势概率分析表明,经过改编的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 和 EQ-5D-Y-5L 与原始版本之间几乎没有差异。使用效用对经过改编和原始 EQ-5D-Y-3L 进行的补充心理测量分析显示,与使用等级总和得分进行的分析结果相似。

结论

研究结果表明,与原始版本相比,2-4 岁儿童的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 和 EQ-5D-Y-5L 经过改编的版本在心理测量性能方面有了提高。

相似文献

1
Psychometric Performance Comparison of the Adapted versus Original Versions of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and -Y-5L in Proxy Respondents for 2- to 4-Year-Olds.适用于 2 至 4 岁儿童的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 和 -Y-5L 中文版和英文版在代理应答者中的心理测量性能比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jun;42(Suppl 1):129-145. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01350-6. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
2
Comparative Psychometric Performance of Common Generic Paediatric Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument Descriptive Systems: Results from the Australian Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison Study.常见通用儿童健康相关生活质量量表描述系统的比较心理计量学性能:来自澳大利亚儿科多仪器比较研究的结果。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jun;42(Suppl 1):39-55. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01330-2. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
3
A Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L Using Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison (P-MIC) Study Data.使用儿科多仪器比较(P-MIC)研究数据对 EQ-5D-Y-3L 和 EQ-5D-Y-5L 的心理测量特性进行比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jun;42(Suppl 1):95-111. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01379-7. Epub 2024 May 15.
4
Validity and responsiveness of EQ-5D-Y in children with haematological malignancies and their caregivers.血液恶性肿瘤患儿及其照顾者的 EQ-5D-Y 的有效性和反应度。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Nov;25(8):1361-1370. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01669-z. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
5
Comparing the Psychometric Performance of Generic Paediatric Health-Related Quality of Life Instruments in Children and Adolescents with ADHD, Anxiety and/or Depression.比较 ADHD、焦虑和/或抑郁儿童和青少年使用通用儿科健康相关生活质量工具的心理计量学性能。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jun;42(Suppl 1):57-77. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01354-2. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
6
EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L proxy report: psychometric performance and agreement with self-report.EQ-5D-Y-3L 和 EQ-5D-Y-5L 代理报告:心理测量性能和与自我报告的一致性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Jun 3;20(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01996-w.
7
Psychometric performance of proxy-reported EQ-5D youth version 5-level (EQ-5D-Y-5L) in comparison with three-level (EQ-5D-Y-3L) in children and adolescents with scoliosis.脊柱侧弯儿童和青少年中,代理报告的EQ-5D青少年版5级(EQ-5D-Y-5L)与3级(EQ-5D-Y-3L)的心理测量学表现比较。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Nov;23(8):1383-1395. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01435-z. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
8
Psychometric performance of the Chichewa versions of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L among healthy and sick children and adolescents in Malawi.马拉维健康和患病儿童及青少年的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 和 EQ-5D-Y-5L 奇切瓦语版本的心理测量性能。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Mar 9;7(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00560-4.
9
Validation of the EQ-5D-Y-5L parent-proxy version among children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.青少年特发性关节炎患儿 EQ-5D-Y-5L 父母代评量表的验证。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Oct;33(10):2677-2691. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03682-4. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
10
Comparing the psychometric properties of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L proxy ratings by informal caregivers and a health professional for people with dementia.比较非专业照护者和健康专业人员对痴呆患者使用 EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-5L 代理评分的心理测量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Oct 5;20(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-02049-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring and Valuing Health Using EuroQol Instruments: New Developments 2025 and Beyond.使用欧洲生活质量量表工具测量和评估健康状况:2025年及以后的新进展
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00989-2.
2
Valuing health states for infants and toddlers: challenges and methodological considerations in EQ-TIPS preference elicitation.评估婴幼儿的健康状态:EQ-TIPS偏好诱导中的挑战与方法学考量
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01789-0.
3
An Australian Value Set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L.EQ-5D-Y-3L的澳大利亚价值集。

本文引用的文献

1
Using Age-Specific Values for Pediatric HRQoL in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Is There a Problem to Be Solved? If So, How?使用特定年龄的儿科 HRQoL 值进行成本效益分析:是否存在需要解决的问题?如果有,如何解决?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Oct;41(10):1165-1174. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01300-8. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
2
A Qualitative Investigation to Develop an Adapted Version of the EQ-5D-Y-3L for Use in Children Aged 2-4 Years.采用 EQ-5D-Y-3L 对 2-4 岁儿童进行适应性改造的定性研究。
Value Health. 2023 Oct;26(10):1525-1534. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.06.004. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
3
A Value Set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L in the Netherlands.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Jul 15;23(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02402-x.
4
Global Assessment of Health Utilities Associated with Pneumococcal Disease in Children-Targeted Literature Reviews.针对儿童肺炎球菌疾病相关健康效用的全球文献综述评估
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01504-0.
5
Measurement Properties of the EQ-5D Instruments in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.儿童和青少年EQ-5D量表的测量属性:一项系统评价
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Apr 19. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00953-0.
6
Selecting PedsQL items to derive the PedsUtil health state classification system to measure health utilities in children.选择 PedsQL 项目来推导出 PedsUtil 健康状态分类系统,以衡量儿童的健康效用。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Jul 10;22(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02268-5.
7
A Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L Using Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison (P-MIC) Study Data.使用儿科多仪器比较(P-MIC)研究数据对 EQ-5D-Y-3L 和 EQ-5D-Y-5L 的心理测量特性进行比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jun;42(Suppl 1):95-111. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01379-7. Epub 2024 May 15.
8
Meeting the Challenges of Preference-Weighted Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measurement in Children.应对儿童偏好加权健康相关生活质量测量的挑战
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jun;42(Suppl 1):3-8. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01383-x. Epub 2024 May 9.
荷兰的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 价值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(Suppl 2):193-203. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01192-0. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
4
Generic Health-Related Quality of Life Utility Measure for Preschool Children (Health Utilities Preschool): Design, Development, and Properties.用于学龄前儿童的通用健康相关生活质量效用衡量工具(Health Utilities Preschool):设计、开发和特性。
Value Health. 2023 Feb;26(2):251-260. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.07.015. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
5
Does Changing the Age of a Child to be Considered in 3-Level Version of EQ-5D-Y Discrete Choice Experiment-Based Valuation Studies Affect Health Preferences?基于 EQ-5D-Y 离散选择实验的价值评估研究中,改变儿童年龄是否会影响健康偏好?
Value Health. 2022 Jul;25(7):1196-1204. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
6
Developing a New Generic Health and Wellbeing Measure: Psychometric Survey Results for the EQ-HWB.开发新的通用健康和幸福度量标准:EQ-HWB 的心理测量调查结果。
Value Health. 2022 Apr;25(4):525-533. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1361. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
7
Systematic Review of Conceptual, Age, Measurement and Valuation Considerations for Generic Multidimensional Childhood Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.系统评价:通用多维儿童患者报告结局测量的概念、年龄、测量和评估考虑因素。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Apr;40(4):379-431. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01128-0. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
8
The Challenges of Measuring and Valuing Quality of Life in Preschool Children: A Retrospective Review of NICE Appraisals.测量和评估学龄前儿童生活质量的挑战:对英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所评估的回顾性研究
Children (Basel). 2021 Aug 31;8(9):765. doi: 10.3390/children8090765.
9
Psychometric Performance of HRQoL Measures: An Australian Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison Study Protocol (P-MIC).健康相关生活质量测量工具的心理测量性能:一项澳大利亚儿科多工具比较研究方案(P-MIC)。
Children (Basel). 2021 Aug 20;8(8):714. doi: 10.3390/children8080714.
10
Age dependency of EQ-5D-Youth health states valuations on a visual analogue scale.EQ-5D-Youth 健康状态量表视觉模拟评分的年龄依赖性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Dec 12;18(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01638-z.