• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 价值集。

A Value Set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L in the Netherlands.

机构信息

EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(Suppl 2):193-203. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01192-0. Epub 2022 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1007/s40273-022-01192-0
PMID:36216977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9549846/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

There is increasing interest in preference-accompanied measures of health for paediatric populations. The child-friendly EQ-5D version, EQ-5D-Y-3L, is one such instrument, but the lack of a Dutch value set prevents its use in economic evaluations of healthcare interventions in the Netherlands. This study aims at covering this gap by collecting preferences using a standardised protocol for deriving EQ-5D-Y-3L value sets.

METHODS

Composite time trade-off data were collected using videoconferencing interviews, with each respondent completing ten composite time trade-off tasks. Discrete choice experiment data were collected using an online survey, with respondents each completing 15 paired comparisons. Respondents completed these tasks considering what they prefer for a hypothetical 10-year-old child. Discrete choice experiment data were analysed using a ten-parameter mixed-logit model and anchored to the quality-adjusted life-year scale using the mean observed composite time trade-off values.

RESULTS

The study collected preferences for 197 respondents using composite time trade-off and for 959 respondents using a discrete choice experiment. The discrete choice experiment sample was representative for the Dutch population in terms of age and sex. The level 3 weight for pain/discomfort was the largest, followed by feeling worried, sad or unhappy, usual activities, mobility and self-care. Health state values ranged between -0.218 and 1.

CONCLUSIONS

This study generated a Dutch value set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L, which can be used for the computation of quality-adjusted life-years for economic evaluations of healthcare interventions in paediatric populations.

摘要

背景和目的

越来越多的人对儿童群体的健康偏好伴随措施感兴趣。儿童友好型 EQ-5D 版本,即 EQ-5D-Y-3L,就是这样一种工具,但荷兰缺乏价值体系,阻碍了其在荷兰医疗保健干预措施的经济评估中的使用。本研究旨在通过使用标准协议来收集偏好来填补这一空白,以制定 EQ-5D-Y-3L 价值体系。

方法

使用视频会议访谈收集综合时间权衡数据,每个受访者完成十个综合时间权衡任务。使用在线调查收集离散选择实验数据,受访者每人完成 15 个配对比较。受访者在考虑为一个假设的 10 岁儿童提供什么的情况下完成这些任务。使用十参数混合逻辑模型分析离散选择实验数据,并使用平均观察到的综合时间权衡值将其锚定到质量调整生命年尺度。

结果

本研究使用综合时间权衡法收集了 197 名受访者的偏好,使用离散选择实验法收集了 959 名受访者的偏好。离散选择实验样本在年龄和性别方面代表了荷兰人口。疼痛/不适的水平 3 权重最大,其次是担忧、悲伤或不快乐、日常活动、移动性和自我护理。健康状况值在-0.218 到 1 之间。

结论

本研究生成了 EQ-5D-Y-3L 的荷兰价值体系,可用于计算儿童群体医疗保健干预措施经济评估中的质量调整生命年。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a70/9758240/006391e7dad4/40273_2022_1192_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a70/9758240/c90584d6949e/40273_2022_1192_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a70/9758240/15f65cb478f1/40273_2022_1192_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a70/9758240/006391e7dad4/40273_2022_1192_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a70/9758240/c90584d6949e/40273_2022_1192_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a70/9758240/15f65cb478f1/40273_2022_1192_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a70/9758240/006391e7dad4/40273_2022_1192_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A Value Set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L in the Netherlands.荷兰的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 价值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(Suppl 2):193-203. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01192-0. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
2
Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for Indonesia by Mapping the DCE onto TTO Values.基于离散选择实验(DCE)到时间权衡(TTO)值的映射来估计印度尼西亚的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(Suppl 2):157-167. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01210-1. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
3
Value Set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L in Hungary.匈牙利的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 量表值。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(Suppl 2):205-215. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01190-2. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
4
EQ-5D-Y Value Set for Germany.德国 EQ-5D-Y 量表值。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(Suppl 2):217-229. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01143-9. Epub 2022 May 23.
5
Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for Brazil.估算巴西的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Sep;42(9):1047-1063. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01404-9. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
6
Does Changing the Age of a Child to be Considered in 3-Level Version of EQ-5D-Y Discrete Choice Experiment-Based Valuation Studies Affect Health Preferences?基于 EQ-5D-Y 离散选择实验的价值评估研究中,改变儿童年龄是否会影响健康偏好?
Value Health. 2022 Jul;25(7):1196-1204. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
7
EQ-5D-Y Value Set for Slovenia.斯洛文尼亚 EQ-5D-Y 值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Apr;39(4):463-471. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00994-4. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
8
Valuation of EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Youth Version (EQ-5D-Y) and EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Three-Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Health States: The Impact of Wording and Perspective.欧洲五维健康量表青年版(EQ-5D-Y)和欧洲五维健康量表 3 级版(EQ-5D-3L)健康状态的估值:措辞和视角的影响。
Value Health. 2018 Nov;21(11):1291-1298. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
9
Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States in Poland: the First EQ-VT-Based Study in Central and Eastern Europe.波兰的 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态估值:中欧和东欧的首次基于 EQ-VT 的研究。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Sep;37(9):1165-1176. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00811-7.
10
An EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for Belgium.比利时的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(Suppl 2):169-180. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01187-x. Epub 2022 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
An Australian Value Set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L.EQ-5D-Y-3L的澳大利亚价值集。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Jul 15;23(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02402-x.
2
Findings from a roundtable discussion with Pakistani stakeholders on measuring and valuing health and health-related quality of life for children and adolescents.与巴基斯坦利益相关者就衡量和评估儿童及青少年的健康状况及与健康相关的生活质量举行的圆桌讨论的结果。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Jul 1;23(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02397-5.
3
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the comparative feasibility, acceptability and equivalence of videoconference interviews and face-to-face interviews using the time trade-off technique.评估使用时间权衡技术的视频会议访谈和面对面访谈的比较可行性、可接受性和等效性。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Sep;309:115227. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115227. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
2
EQ-5D-Y Value Set for Germany.德国 EQ-5D-Y 量表值。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(Suppl 2):217-229. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01143-9. Epub 2022 May 23.
3
Accounting for Unobservable Preference Heterogeneity and Evaluating Alternative Anchoring Approaches to Estimate Country-Specific EQ-5D-Y Value Sets: A Case Study Using Spanish Preference Data.
健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
4
Omission of dexamethasone in paclitaxel premedication regimens: protocol of the multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority DEXASTOP trial.紫杉醇预处理方案中省略地塞米松:多中心、随机、非劣效性DEXASTOP试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 25;15(4):e102770. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102770.
5
Measurement Properties of the EQ-5D Instruments in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.儿童和青少年EQ-5D量表的测量属性:一项系统评价
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Apr 19. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00953-0.
6
Exploring the feasibility of using discrete choice experiment (DCE) to elicit preferences among children and adolescents: protocol for a convergent parallel mixed methods study.探索使用离散选择实验(DCE)来引出儿童和青少年偏好的可行性:一项收敛平行混合方法研究的方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 8;15(4):e097598. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097598.
7
Cost-effectiveness of support for health professionals to implement physical activity promotion: a protocol for within-trial and modelled economic evaluations of the PROMOTE-PA effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial.支持卫生专业人员实施身体活动促进的成本效益:PROMOTE-PA有效性-实施混合试验的试验内和模型经济评估方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 5;15(4):e098452. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098452.
8
A head-to-head comparison of the adult EQ-5D-5L and youth EQ-5D-Y-5L in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.成人EQ-5D-5L与青少年EQ-5D-Y-5L在特发性脊柱侧凸青少年中的直接比较。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Jan 29;9(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00842-z.
9
Comparison of EQ-5D-Y-3L Utility Scores Using Nine Country-Specific Value Sets in Chinese Adolescents.在中国青少年中使用九种特定国家价值集比较EQ-5D-Y-3L效用评分
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Feb;43(2):209-221. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01451-2. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
10
The societal burden associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional burden-of-disease study.青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的社会负担:一项疾病负担的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):3065. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20423-x.
考虑不可观测的偏好异质性并评估替代的锚定方法来估计特定国家的 EQ-5D-Y 值集:使用西班牙偏好数据的案例研究。
Value Health. 2022 May;25(5):835-843. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
4
An EQ-5D-5L value set for Italy using videoconferencing interviews and feasibility of a new mode of administration.意大利使用视频会议访谈构建 EQ-5D-5L 值集以及一种新管理模式的可行性。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114519. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114519. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
5
Self vs. other, child vs. adult. An experimental comparison of valuation perspectives for valuation of EQ-5D-Y-3L health states.自我与他人,儿童与成人。EQ-5D-Y-3L 健康状态评估中评估视角的实验性比较。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Dec;22(9):1507-1518. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01377-y. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
6
Valuing child and adolescent health: a qualitative study on different perspectives and priorities taken by the adult general public.重视儿童和青少年健康:一项关于普通成年人群不同观点和优先事项的定性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Sep 23;19(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01858-x.
7
Estimation of an EORTC QLU-C10 Value Set for Spain Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.使用离散选择实验估计西班牙的 EORTC QLU-C10 值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Sep;39(9):1085-1098. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01058-x. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
8
Valuation Survey of EQ-5D-Y Based on the International Common Protocol: Development of a Value Set in Japan.基于国际通用协议的 EQ-5D-Y 评估调查:日本制定价值体系。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Jul;41(5):597-606. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211001859. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
9
EQ-5D-Y Value Set for Slovenia.斯洛文尼亚 EQ-5D-Y 值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Apr;39(4):463-471. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00994-4. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
10
Time for Tele-TTO? Lessons Learned From Digital Interviewer-Assisted Time Trade-Off Data Collection.电话时间贸易-off(Tele-TTO)的时机到了吗?从数字化访谈员辅助时间贸易-off 数据收集中学到的经验。
Patient. 2021 Sep;14(5):459-469. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00490-z. Epub 2020 Dec 21.