Suppr超能文献

通过一项平行、多中心、实用随机对照试验——IODA试验,比较即刻与选择性延迟手术修复治疗急性前交叉韧带损伤的效果

Comparison of immediate versus optional delayed surgical repair for treatment of acute anterior cruciate ligament injury through a parallel, multicentric, pragmatic randomized controlled trial - IODA trial.

作者信息

Smeets Annemie, Ghafelzadeh Ahwaz Feryal, Bogaerts Stijn, Berger Pieter, Peers Koen

机构信息

Research group of Physical & Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Development & Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Research group of Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences & Physiotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Jan 18;16(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00816-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standard care for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries often includes surgical reconstruction of the ACL. However, two randomized controlled trials [1, 2] (RCT) concluded that conservative treatment does not result in inferior clinical outcomes compared to immediate ACL reconstruction. More research is needed to verify these results and assess whether patient-specific parameters determine if a patient would benefit from one treatment option over the other.

METHODS

This is a pragmatic, multi-center RCT with two parallel groups. Patients with an acute ACL injury will be recruited from Belgian hospitals. Patients will be randomized to conservative treatment (rehabilitation + optional delayed surgery) or immediate ACL reconstruction (< 12 weeks). The primary outcome is the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 7 months (short term) and 1-year long term) post-injury. These following additional outcomes will be administered at 4 and 7 months (short term) and 1, 2, and 3 years post-injury (long term): patient-reported outcomes concerning knee symptoms, knee function and quality of life, functional knee tests, time to return to pre-injury activity level and return to work, structural knee joint damage and cartilage health (only at 4 months and 3 years post-injury), as well as adverse events such as re-rupture rates. Furthermore, the secondary objective is to identify (through a predictive analysis) individuals who would benefit the most from early reconstruction versus those who should rather be treated conservatively.

DISCUSSION

This large RCT will assess the clinical effectiveness of both surgical and conservative treatment. In addition, it will be the first study that provides insights into which patient-specific factors predict successful outcomes after conservative treatment of ACL injuries. These results will be the first step toward early patient identification regarding treatment decisions. This is urgently needed to avoid (1) delayed surgeries and prolonged rehabilitation and (2) unnecessary surgeries.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

this trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05747079) on 10/02/2023.

摘要

背景

前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤的标准治疗通常包括ACL的手术重建。然而,两项随机对照试验[1,2]得出结论,与立即进行ACL重建相比,保守治疗并不会导致临床结果更差。需要更多研究来验证这些结果,并评估患者特定参数是否能决定患者从一种治疗方案中比另一种治疗方案中获益更多。

方法

这是一项具有两个平行组的务实、多中心随机对照试验。急性ACL损伤患者将从比利时医院招募。患者将被随机分为保守治疗(康复治疗+可选的延迟手术)或立即进行ACL重建(<12周)。主要结局指标是受伤后7个月(短期)和1年(长期)的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(KOOS)。在受伤后4个月和7个月(短期)以及1年、2年和3年(长期)将进行以下额外结局指标的评估:患者报告的膝关节症状、膝关节功能和生活质量方面的结局指标、膝关节功能测试、恢复到受伤前活动水平和恢复工作的时间、膝关节结构损伤和软骨健康状况(仅在受伤后4个月和3年),以及诸如再次断裂率等不良事件。此外,次要目标是(通过预测分析)确定哪些个体从早期重建中获益最大,哪些个体更适合保守治疗。

讨论

这项大型随机对照试验将评估手术和保守治疗的临床效果。此外,这将是第一项深入了解哪些患者特定因素可预测ACL损伤保守治疗成功结局的研究。这些结果将是朝着早期识别患者治疗决策迈出的第一步。这对于避免(1)延迟手术和延长康复时间以及(2)不必要的手术来说是迫切需要的。

试验注册

该试验于2023年2月10日在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT05747079)上注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69e7/10797880/c5279e5e31f4/13102_2024_816_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验