Rosso Federica, Bonasia Davide E, Cottino Umberto, Cambursano Simone, Dettoni Federico, Rossi Roberto
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, AO Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Joints. 2018 Mar 7;6(1):23-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1636931. eCollection 2018 Mar.
To analyze the prognostic factors influencing subjective and objective outcomes and return to play (RTP) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R). Primary ACL-Rs using a transtibial technique performed between 2008 and 2012 were included. Data regarding patients, surgery, sports, and rehabilitation, including an on-field rehabilitation (OFR) and duration of the rehabilitation program, were collected. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective and objective evaluation forms, and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Lysholm questionnaires were used for the assessment of subjective and objective outcomes. The Subjective Patient Outcome for Return to Sports and ACL-return to sport after injury (RSI) scores were used for RTP evaluation. Several potential predictors of outcome were tested with a univariate analysis. All the variables with < 0.1 were retested in a logistic regression model to evaluate their association with the outcomes. In total, 176 cases were included with an average follow-up of 44.1 months. Of the patients, 92.2% were rated as normal or nearly normal at the IKDC evaluation. In addition, 90.1% of the patients returned to sport, with 57.6% returning to the same preinjury level. Objective outcomes were negatively influenced by late rehabilitation (odds ratio [OR] = 2.75). Performing an OFR phase during the rehabilitation was associated with better subjective outcomes (OR = 2.71). Length of rehabilitation strongly influenced the RTP rate (OR = 13.16). Conversely, higher ACL-RSI score was inversely related to RTP. Objective IKDC score was inversely related to the ACL-RSI (OR = 0.31), whereas subjective score was correlated with both the total ACL-RSI score (OR = 0.15) and the level of activity (OR = 0.20). This study confirmed the role of rehabilitation on subjective and objective outcomes and on RTP. Particularly, the complete adherence to a rehabilitation program, including an OFR phase, resulted in better subjective outcomes and higher RTP rate. The relationship between psychological factors, measured through the ACL-RSI score, and RTP was confirmed. Level III, observational study without a control group.
分析影响前交叉韧带重建(ACL-R)后主观和客观结果以及恢复运动(RTP)的预后因素。纳入2008年至2012年间采用经胫骨技术进行的初次ACL-R病例。收集有关患者、手术、运动和康复的数据,包括现场康复(OFR)和康复计划的持续时间。使用国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)主观和客观评估表、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分以及Lysholm问卷来评估主观和客观结果。使用主观患者恢复运动结果和ACL损伤后恢复运动(RSI)评分来评估RTP。通过单因素分析测试了几个潜在的结果预测因素。所有P值<0.1的变量在逻辑回归模型中重新测试,以评估它们与结果的关联。总共纳入176例病例,平均随访44.1个月。在IKDC评估中,92.2%的患者被评为正常或接近正常。此外,90.1%的患者恢复运动,57.6%的患者恢复到受伤前的相同水平。客观结果受到康复延迟的负面影响(优势比[OR]=2.75)。在康复期间进行OFR阶段与更好的主观结果相关(OR=2.71)。康复时间长度强烈影响RTP率(OR=13.16)。相反,较高的ACL-RSI评分与RTP呈负相关。IKDC客观评分与ACL-RSI呈负相关(OR=0.31),而主观评分与总ACL-RSI评分(OR=0.15)和活动水平(OR=0.20)均相关。本研究证实了康复对主观和客观结果以及RTP的作用。特别是,完全遵守包括OFR阶段的康复计划会带来更好的主观结果和更高的RTP率。通过ACL-RSI评分衡量的心理因素与RTP之间的关系得到了证实。三级,无对照组的观察性研究。