Suppr超能文献

孕晚期胎儿大小核对对足月胎儿生长受限检出率的影响。

The impact of late pregnancy dating on the detection of fetal growth restriction at term.

机构信息

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

Nuffield Department of Women's Reproductive Health, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 May;103(5):938-945. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14769. Epub 2024 Jan 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The inaccuracy of late pregnancy dating is often discussed, and the impact on diagnosis of fetal growth restriction is a concern. However, the magnitude and direction of this effect has not previously been demonstrated. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of late pregnancy dating by head circumference on the detection of late onset growth restriction, compared to first trimester crown-rump length dating.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a cohort study of 14 013 pregnancies receiving obstetric care at a tertiary center over a three-year period. Universal scans were performed at 12 weeks, including crown-rump length; at 20 weeks including fetal biometry; and at 36 weeks, where biometry, umbilical artery doppler and cerebroplacental ratio were used to determine the incidence of fetal growth restriction according to the Delphi consensus. For the entire cohort, the gestational age was first calculated using T1 dating; and was then recalculated using head circumference at 20 weeks (T2 dating); and at 36 weeks (T3 dating). The incidence of fetal growth restriction following T2 and T3 dating was compared to T1 dating using four-by-four sensitivity tables.

RESULTS

When the cohort was redated from T1 to T2, the median gestation at delivery changed from 40 + 0 to 40 + 2 weeks (p < 0.001). When the cohort was redated from T1 to T3, the median gestation at delivery changed from 40 + 0 to 40 + 3 weeks (p < 0.001). T2 dating resulted in fetal growth restriction sensitivity of 80.2% with positive predictive value of 78.8% compared to T1 dating. T3 dating resulted in sensitivity of 8.6% and positive predictive value of 27.7%, respectively. The sensitivity of abnormal CPR remained high despite T2 and T3 redating; 98.0% and 89.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although dating at 11-14 weeks is recommended, late pregnancy dating is sometimes inevitable, and this can prolong the estimated due date by an average of two to three days. One in five pregnancies which would be classified as growth restricted if the pregnancy was dated in the first trimester, will be reclassified as nongrowth restricted following dating at 20 weeks, whereas nine out of 10 pregnancies will be reclassified as non-growth restricted with 36-week dating.

摘要

简介

妊娠晚期的预产期不准确的问题经常被讨论,而这对胎儿生长受限的诊断影响是人们关注的焦点。然而,这种影响的程度和方向以前并未得到证实。在这项研究中,我们旨在研究头围在妊娠晚期的预产期对晚期发生的生长受限的检测的影响,与头臂长在妊娠早期的预产期进行比较。

材料和方法

这是一项在三年期间在一家三级中心接受产科护理的 14013 例妊娠的队列研究。在 12 周时进行了包括头臂长的常规超声检查;在 20 周时进行了包括胎儿生物测量的常规超声检查;在 36 周时,使用生物测量、脐动脉多普勒和脑胎盘比来确定根据德尔福共识的胎儿生长受限的发生率。对于整个队列,首先使用 T1 对胎龄进行计算;然后使用 20 周时的头围(T2 计算);以及 36 周时的头围(T3 计算)重新计算胎龄。使用四乘四灵敏度表比较 T2 和 T3 后重新计算胎龄时的胎儿生长受限发生率。

结果

当将队列从 T1 重新计算为 T2 时,分娩时的中位孕龄从 40+0 变为 40+2 周(p<0.001)。当将队列从 T1 重新计算为 T3 时,分娩时的中位孕龄从 40+0 变为 40+3 周(p<0.001)。与 T1 计算相比,T2 计算导致胎儿生长受限的敏感性为 80.2%,阳性预测值为 78.8%。T3 计算的敏感性分别为 8.6%和阳性预测值为 27.7%。尽管 T2 和 T3 重新计算,异常 CPR 的敏感性仍然很高;分别为 98.0%和 89.4%。

结论

尽管建议在 11-14 周时进行预产期计算,但妊娠晚期的预产期计算有时是不可避免的,这会将估计的预产期延长平均两到三天。如果在妊娠早期进行预产期计算,五分之一的妊娠会被归类为生长受限,但在 20 周进行预产期计算后,其中五分之四会被重新归类为非生长受限,而在 36 周进行预产期计算后,所有妊娠都会被重新归类为非生长受限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73e8/11019509/753cd0c82405/AOGS-103-938-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验