Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Inserm U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon1 University, Lyon, France.
Minerva Endocrinol (Torino). 2024 Sep;49(3):321-334. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6507.23.04058-7. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
Aggressive pituitary tumors are a subset of pituitary neoplasms, characterized by unusually fast growth rate, invasiveness and overall resistance to optimized standard treatment. When metastases are present, the term pituitary carcinoma is employed. After failure of standard treatments, current guidelines recommend first-line temozolomide monotherapy. However, a significant number of patients do not respond to temozolomide, or experience disease progression following its discontinuation; in these latter cases, re-challenge with temozolomide is generally advised, although the reported outcomes have been less satisfactory. Although no alternative therapies have been formally recommended after temozolomide failure, growing evidence regarding potential second- or third-line therapeutic strategies has emerged. In the present work, we reviewed the available evidence published up to April 2023 involving the most relevant therapies employed so far, namely immune checkpoint inhibitors, bevacizumab, peptide radionuclide receptor therapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and mTOR inhibitors. For each treatment, we report efficacy and safety outcomes, along with data regarding potential predictors of response. Overall, immune checkpoint inhibitors and bevacizumab are showing the most promise as therapeutic options after temozolomide failure. The former showed better responses in pituitary carcinomas. Peptide radionuclide receptor therapy has also showed some efficacy in these tumors, while tyrosine kinase inhibitors and mTOR inhibitors have exhibited so far limited or no efficacy. Further studies, as well as an individualized, patient-tailored approach, are clearly needed. In addition, we report an unpublished case of a silent corticotroph pituitary carcinoma that progressed under dual immunotherapy, and then showed stable disease under a combination of lomustine and bevacizumab.
侵袭性垂体肿瘤是垂体肿瘤的一个亚类,其特征为生长速度异常快、侵袭性和对优化标准治疗的总体耐药性。当存在转移时,使用垂体癌一词。在标准治疗失败后,目前的指南建议一线使用替莫唑胺单药治疗。然而,相当数量的患者对替莫唑胺没有反应,或在其停药后出现疾病进展;在这些情况下,通常建议重新使用替莫唑胺进行挑战,尽管报告的结果不太满意。尽管替莫唑胺失败后尚未正式推荐替代治疗方法,但关于潜在二线或三线治疗策略的越来越多的证据已经出现。在本工作中,我们回顾了截至 2023 年 4 月发表的关于迄今为止使用的最相关治疗方法的现有证据,即免疫检查点抑制剂、贝伐珠单抗、肽放射性核素受体治疗、酪氨酸激酶抑制剂和 mTOR 抑制剂。对于每种治疗方法,我们报告疗效和安全性结果,并提供有关潜在反应预测因素的数据。总体而言,免疫检查点抑制剂和贝伐珠单抗作为替莫唑胺失败后的治疗选择显示出最大的希望。前者在垂体癌中显示出更好的反应。肽放射性核素受体治疗在这些肿瘤中也显示出一定的疗效,而酪氨酸激酶抑制剂和 mTOR 抑制剂迄今为止显示出有限或没有疗效。显然需要进一步的研究以及个体化、针对患者的方法。此外,我们报告了一例未发表的沉默促皮质素垂体癌病例,该病例在双重免疫治疗下进展,然后在洛莫司汀和贝伐珠单抗联合治疗下显示疾病稳定。