Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Division of Nursing Sciences and Reproductive Health, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Women Birth. 2024 Mar;37(2):296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.01.007. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
Previous research indicates disparities in the care of bereaved parents and siblings following a stillbirth in the family. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effects of interventions aimed at reducing psychological distress among parents or siblings in high-income countries after experiencing a stillbirth.
The databases CINAHL, Medline, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched in August 2022.
Four intervention studies from the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK), Finland, and Australia, met the inclusion criteria. The interventions comprised a perinatal grief support team; a perinatal counselling service; a grief support program; and a support package including contacts with peer supporters and health care staff. No studies of interventions for siblings were found. The results could not be synthesised due to disparities in interventions and outcome measures. The risk of bias was assessed as high in all four studies and the certainty for all outcomes was rated as very low.
More controlled trials with rigorous methods are needed to evaluate the effect of bereavement support interventions in parents and siblings after stillbirth. Future studies should include a core outcome set to make them more comparable. Most of the studies in this review were assessed to have an overall high risk of bias, mainly due to problems with missing outcome data; thus, future studies could specifically target this problem.
先前的研究表明,在高收入国家,在家庭中经历死胎后,丧亲父母和兄弟姐妹的护理存在差异。本系统评价的目的是评估针对经历死胎后父母或兄弟姐妹的心理困扰的干预措施的效果。
于 2022 年 8 月在 CINAHL、Medline、PsycInfo、Cochrane Library 和 EMBASE 数据库中进行检索。
四项来自美国、英国、芬兰和澳大利亚的干预研究符合纳入标准。干预措施包括围产期悲伤支持小组、围产期咨询服务、悲伤支持计划以及包括与同伴支持者和医疗保健人员联系的支持包。未发现针对兄弟姐妹的干预措施研究。由于干预措施和结局测量的差异,无法对结果进行综合分析。四项研究的偏倚风险均评估为高,所有结局的确定性均评为极低。
需要更多具有严格方法的对照试验来评估失独支持干预对死胎后父母和兄弟姐妹的影响。未来的研究应包括核心结局集,以使其更具可比性。本综述中的大多数研究被评估为整体高偏倚风险,主要是由于结局数据缺失问题;因此,未来的研究可以专门针对这一问题。