文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

用于 COVID-19 的移动应用程序:综述的系统评价

Mobile Apps for COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Reviews.

作者信息

Holl Felix, Schobel Johannes, Swoboda Walter J

机构信息

DigiHealth Institute, Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences, 89231 Neu-Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 8;12(2):139. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020139.


DOI:10.3390/healthcare12020139
PMID:38255029
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10815093/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: One measure national governments took to react to the acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic was mobile applications (apps). This study aims to provide a high-level overview of published reviews of mobile apps used in association with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), examine factors that contributed to the success of these apps, and provide data for further research into this topic. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of reviews (also referred to as an umbrella review) and searched two databases, Medline and Embase, for peer-reviewed reviews of COVID-19 mobile apps that were written in English and published between January 1st 2020 and April 25th 2022. RESULTS: Out of the initial 17,611 studies, 24 studies were eligible for the analysis. Publication dates ranged from May 2020 to January 2022. In total, 54% ( = 13) of the studies were published in 2021, and 33% ( = 8) were published in 2020. Most reviews included in our review of reviews analyzed apps from the USA, the UK, and India. Apps from most of the African and Middle and South American countries were not analyzed in the reviews included in our study. Categorization resulted in four clusters (app overview, privacy and security, MARS rating, and miscellaneous). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a high-level overview of 24 reviews of apps for COVID-19, identifies factors that contributed to the success of these apps, and identifies a gap in the current literature. The study provides data for further analyses and further research.

摘要

背景:各国政府应对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)大流行采取的一项措施是开发移动应用程序(应用)。本研究旨在对已发表的与冠状病毒病19(COVID-19)相关的移动应用程序综述进行高层次概述,研究促成这些应用成功的因素,并为该主题的进一步研究提供数据。 方法:我们进行了一项综述的系统综述(也称为伞状综述),并在两个数据库Medline和Embase中搜索了2020年1月1日至2022年4月25日期间以英文发表的关于COVID-19移动应用程序的同行评审综述。 结果:在最初的17611项研究中,有24项研究符合分析条件。发表日期从2020年5月到2022年1月。总共有54%( = 13)的研究在2021年发表,33%( = 8)在2020年发表。我们的综述中纳入的大多数综述分析了来自美国、英国和印度的应用程序。我们研究中纳入的综述未分析大多数非洲以及中南美洲国家的应用程序。分类结果形成了四个类别(应用概述、隐私与安全、MARS评分和其他)。 结论:我们的研究对24篇关于COVID-19应用程序的综述进行了高层次概述,确定了促成这些应用成功的因素,并指出了当前文献中的一个空白。该研究为进一步的分析和研究提供了数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b518/10815093/f39e7faa2702/healthcare-12-00139-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b518/10815093/9f2c6e5d4fca/healthcare-12-00139-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b518/10815093/45b21f451135/healthcare-12-00139-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b518/10815093/ffcbee67aa01/healthcare-12-00139-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b518/10815093/c18a0e91ff01/healthcare-12-00139-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b518/10815093/f39e7faa2702/healthcare-12-00139-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b518/10815093/9f2c6e5d4fca/healthcare-12-00139-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b518/10815093/45b21f451135/healthcare-12-00139-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b518/10815093/ffcbee67aa01/healthcare-12-00139-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b518/10815093/c18a0e91ff01/healthcare-12-00139-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b518/10815093/f39e7faa2702/healthcare-12-00139-g005.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Mobile Apps for COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Reviews.

Healthcare (Basel). 2024-1-8

[2]
Mobile Apps Leveraged in the COVID-19 Pandemic in East and South-East Asia: Review and Content Analysis.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-11-11

[3]
Patients' Perspectives on the Data Confidentiality, Privacy, and Security of mHealth Apps: Systematic Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-5-31

[4]
An overview of mobile applications (apps) to support the coronavirus disease 2019 response in India.

Indian J Med Res. 2020-5

[5]
Mobile Apps for the Management of Gastrointestinal Diseases: Systematic Search and Evaluation Within App Stores.

J Med Internet Res. 2022-10-5

[6]
Mobile applications in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic search, use case mapping, and quality assessment using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).

BMC Digit Health. 2023

[7]
Patient-Centered Chronic Wound Care Mobile Apps: Systematic Identification, Analysis, and Assessment.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024-3-21

[8]
Planting Seeds for the Future: Scoping Review of Child Health Promotion Apps for Parents.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023-7-20

[9]
Identification and Evaluation of Methodologies to Assess the Quality of Mobile Health Apps in High-, Low-, and Middle-Income Countries: Rapid Review.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-10-12

[10]
Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Quality of Resilience-Building Mobile Health Apps for Military, Veteran, and Public Safety Personnel Populations: Scoping Literature Review and App Evaluation.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022-1-19

引用本文的文献

[1]
Reviewing Mobile Apps for Teaching Human Anatomy: Search and Quality Evaluation Study.

JMIR Med Educ. 2025-2-14

本文引用的文献

[1]
Apps for Covid-19 in Germany: assessment using the German Mobile App Rating Scale.

JAMIA Open. 2022-9-26

[2]
Differences in incidence and fatality of COVID-19 by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant versus Delta variant in relation to vaccine coverage: A world-wide review.

J Med Virol. 2023-1

[3]
Evaluating the Quality of a Clinical Mobile App for Physicians' CT Scan Ordering Using the MARS Rating Scale.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022-6-29

[4]
The function and quality of individual epidemic prevention and control apps during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review of Chinese apps.

Int J Med Inform. 2022-4

[5]
Data privacy during pandemics: a systematic literature review of COVID-19 smartphone applications.

PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022-1-4

[6]
Reviewing and Content Analysis of Persian Language Mobile Health Apps for COVID-19 Management.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022-1-14

[7]
Methods Used to Evaluate mHealth Applications for Cardiovascular Disease: A Quasi-Systematic Scoping Review.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021-11-23

[8]
A Review on the Mobile Applications Developed for COVID-19: An Exploratory Analysis.

IEEE Access. 2020-8-7

[9]
Mobile Apps Leveraged in the COVID-19 Pandemic in East and South-East Asia: Review and Content Analysis.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-11-11

[10]
Effectiveness of contact tracing apps for SARS-CoV-2: a rapid systematic review.

BMJ Open. 2021-7-12

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索