Suppr超能文献

接触者追踪应用程序在 SARS-CoV-2 防控中的效果:快速系统评价。

Effectiveness of contact tracing apps for SARS-CoV-2: a rapid systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 12;11(7):e050519. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050519.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review evidence on effectiveness of contact tracing apps (CTAs) for SARS-CoV-2 on epidemiological and clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

Rapid systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

EMBASE (OVID), MEDLINE (PubMed), BioRxiv and MedRxiv were searched up to 28 October 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies, both empirical and model-based, assessing effect of CTAs for SARS-CoV-2 on reproduction number (R), total number of infections, hospitalisation rate, mortality rate, and other epidemiologically and clinically relevant outcomes, were eligible for inclusion.

DATA EXTRACTION

Empirical and model-based studies were critically appraised using separate checklists. Data on type of study (ie, empirical or model-based), sample size, (simulated) time horizon, study population, CTA type (and associated interventions), comparator and outcomes assessed, were extracted. The most important findings were extracted and narratively summarised. Specifically for model-based studies, characteristics and values of important model parameters were collected.

RESULTS

2140 studies were identified, of which 17 studies (2 empirical, 15 model-based studies) were eligible and included in this review. Both empirical studies were observational (non-randomised) studies and at high risk of bias, most importantly due to risk of confounding. Risk of bias of model-based studies was considered low for 12 out of 15 studies. Most studies demonstrated beneficial effects of CTAs on R, total number of infections and mortality rate. No studies assessed effect on hospitalisation. Effect size was dependent on model parameters values used, but in general, a beneficial effect was observed at CTA adoption rates of 20% or higher.

CONCLUSIONS

CTAs have the potential to be effective in reducing SARS-CoV-2 related epidemiological and clinical outcomes, though effect size depends on other model parameters (eg, proportion of asymptomatic individuals, or testing delays), and interventions after CTA notification. Methodologically sound comparative empirical studies on effectiveness of CTAs are required to confirm findings from model-based studies.

摘要

目的

系统评价接触者追踪应用程序(CTA)在 SARS-CoV-2 对流行病学和临床结局的有效性方面的证据。

设计

快速系统评价。

数据来源

截至 2020 年 10 月 28 日,检索 EMBASE(OVID)、MEDLINE(PubMed)、BioRxiv 和 MedRxiv。

研究选择

符合纳入标准的研究为评估 CTA 在 SARS-CoV-2 复制数(R)、总感染人数、住院率、死亡率和其他流行病学和临床相关结局方面的效果的经验性和基于模型的研究。

数据提取

使用单独的清单对经验性和基于模型的研究进行批判性评价。提取研究类型(即经验性或基于模型)、样本量、(模拟)时间范围、研究人群、CTA 类型(和相关干预措施)、对照组和评估的结局等数据。提取并叙述总结最重要的发现。特别是对于基于模型的研究,收集了重要模型参数的特征和值。

结果

共确定了 2140 项研究,其中 17 项研究(2 项经验性研究,15 项基于模型的研究)符合纳入标准并纳入本综述。两项经验性研究均为观察性(非随机)研究,且存在较高的偏倚风险,最重要的是由于存在混杂的风险。15 项基于模型的研究中有 12 项被认为偏倚风险低。大多数研究表明 CTA 对 R、总感染人数和死亡率具有有益的影响。没有研究评估对住院的影响。效应大小取决于使用的模型参数值,但一般来说,在 CTA 采用率为 20%或更高时,观察到有益的效果。

结论

CTA 有可能降低 SARS-CoV-2 相关的流行病学和临床结局,但效应大小取决于其他模型参数(例如无症状个体的比例或检测延迟)以及 CTA 通知后的干预措施。需要方法学上合理的比较性经验研究来证实基于模型的研究结果。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of contact tracing apps for SARS-CoV-2: a rapid systematic review.
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 12;11(7):e050519. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050519.
4
Factors Influencing the Adoption of Contact Tracing Applications: Systematic Review and Recommendations.
Front Digit Health. 2022 May 3;4:862466. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.862466. eCollection 2022.
5
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
6
Occurrence and transmission potential of asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections: A living systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 22;17(9):e1003346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003346. eCollection 2020 Sep.
7
Comparative effectiveness of contact tracing interventions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;38(3):243-266. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-00963-z. Epub 2023 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of public health and social measures (PHSM) implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic: An overview of systematic reviews.
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2024 Apr 29;2(5):e12055. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12055. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Accounting for contact tracing in epidemiological birth-death models.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 May 29;21(5):e1012461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012461. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Contact tracing strategies for infectious diseases: A systematic literature review.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 May 9;5(5):e0004579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004579. eCollection 2025.
4
Mathematical Contact Tracing Models for the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 18;13(8):935. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13080935.
5
Test allocation based on risk of infection from first and second order contact tracing.
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 7;20(4):e0320291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320291. eCollection 2025.
6
Developing and validating a content quality evaluation tool for cancer mobile applications.
BMC Cancer. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):1494. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13112-w.
8
Influence parental- and child-related factors on the acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 test methods in schools and daycare facilities.
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 18;12:1264019. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1264019. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of digital contact tracing on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic-a comprehensive modelling study.
EPJ Data Sci. 2021;10(1):37. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-021-00290-x. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
2
Digital herd immunity and COVID-19.
Phys Biol. 2021 Jun 23;18(4). doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/abf5b4.
3
Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control.
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 12;12(1):1655. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21809-w.
4
An Agent-Based Modeling of COVID-19: Validation, Analysis, and Recommendations.
Cognit Comput. 2021 Feb 19:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s12559-020-09801-w.
6
Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013699. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013699.
8
Bidirectional contact tracing could dramatically improve COVID-19 control.
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 11;12(1):232. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20325-7.
9
Modelling the impact of relaxing COVID-19 control measures during a period of low viral transmission.
Med J Aust. 2021 Feb;214(2):79-83. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50845. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
10
Implication of backward contact tracing in the presence of overdispersed transmission in COVID-19 outbreaks.
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Mar 31;5:239. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16344.3. eCollection 2020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验