• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项混合方法研究,旨在探索医院认证的影响。

A Mixed-Methods Study to Explore the Impact of Hospital Accreditation.

机构信息

Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Mohammed Bin Rashid School of Government, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:46958020981463. doi: 10.1177/0046958020981463.

DOI:10.1177/0046958020981463
PMID:33525936
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7970682/
Abstract

There are several hospital accreditors globally but there is limited understanding of how accreditation impacts on hospital performance and the health system objectives. The objective of the study were to explore the impact of hospital accreditation and inform policy decision-making. We adopted a mixed-methods approach to include an online survey and 3 focus groups. We report 27 of 36 private hospitals who responded to the survey. Key reasons for accreditation were to improve quality ( = 23), implement evidence-based practice ( = 17), continuity of accreditation ( = 15), and popularity ( = 11). Reported improvements include quality of care (27), patient care (26), organizational processes (21), and patient satisfaction (19) among others. Average stakeholder satisfaction rate was 74%. Participants from the 3 focus group discussions felt that staff hours and stress levels were high during the accreditation process, and some standards were useful while others were deemed non-essential. There was support for a local accreditation body with an emphasis on best practice. The findings from the study suggest accreditation to have an impact on structure and process measures, but the gains in key areas were short-lived. There is a need to strengthen governance and develop performance measures to evidence outcome improvement, assure alignment with regulation and the health system objectives.

摘要

全球有几家医院认证机构,但对认证如何影响医院绩效和卫生系统目标的理解有限。本研究的目的是探讨医院认证的影响,并为政策决策提供信息。我们采用混合方法,包括在线调查和 3 个焦点小组。我们报告了对调查做出回应的 36 家私立医院中的 27 家。认证的主要原因是提高质量(=23)、实施基于证据的实践(=17)、连续性认证(=15)和普及(=11)。报告的改进包括提高护理质量(27)、患者护理(26)、组织流程(21)和患者满意度(19)等。利益相关者的平均满意度为 74%。来自 3 个焦点小组讨论的参与者认为,在认证过程中,员工的工作时间和压力水平都很高,有些标准是有用的,而有些则被认为是不必要的。人们支持建立一个注重最佳实践的本地认证机构。研究结果表明,认证对结构和流程措施有影响,但在关键领域的收益是短暂的。有必要加强治理并制定绩效措施,以证明结果的改善,确保与法规和卫生系统目标保持一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6303/7970682/dcd65f105d39/10.1177_0046958020981463-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6303/7970682/0985e44c77c1/10.1177_0046958020981463-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6303/7970682/25d162a34c7f/10.1177_0046958020981463-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6303/7970682/dcd65f105d39/10.1177_0046958020981463-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6303/7970682/0985e44c77c1/10.1177_0046958020981463-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6303/7970682/25d162a34c7f/10.1177_0046958020981463-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6303/7970682/dcd65f105d39/10.1177_0046958020981463-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
A Mixed-Methods Study to Explore the Impact of Hospital Accreditation.一项混合方法研究,旨在探索医院认证的影响。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:46958020981463. doi: 10.1177/0046958020981463.
2
A decade of commitment to hospital quality of care: overview of and perceptions on multicomponent quality improvement policies involving accreditation, public reporting, inspection and pay-for-performance.十年医院质量关怀承诺:多方面质量改进政策的概述和看法,包括认证、公开报告、检查和按绩效付费。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 20;21(1):990. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07007-w.
3
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.建设可持续的农村医师队伍。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
Do Magnet®-accredited hospitals show improvements in nurse and patient outcomes compared to non-Magnet hospitals: a systematic review.与非磁石医院相比,获得磁石认证的医院在护士和患者结局方面是否有所改善:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jul 17;13(6):168-219. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2262.
6
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
7
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
8
The impact of accreditation on healthcare quality improvement: a qualitative case study.认证对医疗质量提升的影响:一项定性案例研究。
J Health Organ Manag. 2016 Nov 21;30(8):1242-1258. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2016-0021.
9
Is a hospital quality policy based on a triad of accreditation, public reporting and inspection evidence-based? A narrative review.医院质量政策是否基于认可、公共报告和检查基于证据的三联体?叙述性评论。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 May 28;33(2). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab085.
10
Patients experience more support, information and involvement after first-time hospital accreditation: a before and after study in the Faroe Islands.首次通过医院认证后,患者获得了更多的支持、信息和参与:法罗群岛的一项前后对比研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Nov 12;33(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab149.

引用本文的文献

1
The sustainability of hospital accreditation models: a cross-sectional study.医院评审模式的可持续性:一项横断面研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2025 Mar 4;37(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf017.
2
Perceptions, Attitudes, and Barriers towards the Use of Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions (CBAHI) Standards among Saudi Healthcare Providers.沙特医疗服务提供者对使用医疗机构认证中央委员会(CBAHI)标准的认知、态度和障碍
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 12;12(2):183. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020183.
3
Hospital accreditation: an umbrella review.

本文引用的文献

1
Adherence to the WHO surgical safety checklist: an observational study in a Swiss academic center.对世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的依从性:瑞士一家学术中心的观察性研究。
Patient Saf Surg. 2019 Mar 12;13:14. doi: 10.1186/s13037-019-0194-4. eCollection 2019.
2
Accreditation, Quality, and Making Hospital Care Better.认证、质量与改善医院护理
JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2410-2411. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18810.
3
How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis.
医院认证:伞式综述。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 Feb 24;35(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad007.
4
The attitudes of hospital directors towards normalising accreditation standards: A qualitative descriptive study for Saudi Arabia.医院院长对标准化认证标准的态度:沙特阿拉伯的定性描述性研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2022 Sep 13;34(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzac070.
患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)如何支持临床医生与患者之间的沟通及患者护理?一项实在论综合分析。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Sep 15;2:42. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0061-6. eCollection 2018 Dec.
4
Relationships between structure, process and outcome to assess quality of integrated chronic disease management in a rural South African setting: applying a structural equation model.在南非农村地区评估综合慢性病管理质量时结构、过程与结果之间的关系:应用结构方程模型
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 23;17(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2177-4.
5
How to Sustain Change and Support Continuous Quality Improvement.如何维持变革并支持持续质量改进。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 May 6;11(5):916-924. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11501015. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
6
Counting the costs of accreditation in acute care: an activity-based costing approach.计算急症护理认证的成本:基于作业成本法的方法。
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 8;5(9):e008850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008850.
7
Relationship between cancer center accreditation and performance on publicly reported quality measures.癌症中心认证与公开报告质量指标绩效之间的关系。
Ann Surg. 2014 Jun;259(6):1091-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000542.
8
A quick guide to survey research.调查研究快速指南。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013 Jan;95(1):5-7. doi: 10.1308/003588413X13511609956372.
9
Strategies for sustaining a quality improvement collaborative and its patient safety gains.维持质量改进协作及其患者安全收益的策略。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Aug;24(4):380-90. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs030. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
10
Impact of accreditation on the quality of healthcare services: a systematic review of the literature.认证对医疗服务质量的影响:文献系统评价
Ann Saudi Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):407-16. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.83204.