Slomka Gunda, Schleip Robert, Frei Peter, Kurpiers Nicolas, Krämer Michael, Bauermeister Katharina, Bauermeister Wolfgang
Institute of Sport Science, University of Hildesheim, Universitätsplatz 1, 31141 Hildesheim, Germany.
Conservative and Rehabilitative Orthopedics, Department Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Campus D, Georg-Bauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992 München, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 6;13(2):329. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020329.
The subject of the study was the effect of a multicomponent program (Mobility Routine) on muscular and fascial stiffness, flexibility, subjective well-being, and body perception.
The assumption was that high physical stress affects myofascial structures and joint range of motion. The assessment of myofascial stiffness employed a Shear Wave Elastography. The joint flexibility, pressure pain threshold, and subjective experiences with regard to tension, pain, and general discomfort were documented.
In the CT group, a greater increase in stiffness was measured in fewer measurement areas compared to the MR group. MR demonstrated superior gains in flexibility compared to CT. Both groups experienced significant reductions in pain, tension, and discomfort. In conclusion, repetitive motion patterns akin to CT lead to increased myofascial stiffness, whereas MR yields more balanced stiffness development, compensates for asymmetries, and improves body awareness.
Hence, this study highlights the advantages of mobility training over Crosstrainer exercises and provides valuable insights for the recommendation of training regimens aiming at the enhancement of musculoskeletal functionality and overall well-being.
本研究的主题是多组分方案(活动常规)对肌肉和筋膜僵硬程度、柔韧性、主观幸福感及身体感知的影响。
假设高强度身体应激会影响肌筋膜结构和关节活动范围。采用剪切波弹性成像评估肌筋膜僵硬程度。记录关节柔韧性、压痛阈值以及关于紧张、疼痛和总体不适的主观体验。
与活动常规(MR)组相比,连续训练(CT)组在较少测量区域测量到更大的僵硬程度增加。与CT相比,MR在柔韧性方面有更显著的提升。两组的疼痛、紧张和不适均有显著减轻。总之,类似于CT的重复运动模式会导致肌筋膜僵硬程度增加,而MR能产生更平衡的僵硬程度发展,弥补不对称性,并提高身体感知。
因此,本研究突出了活动训练相对于椭圆机运动的优势,并为旨在增强肌肉骨骼功能和总体幸福感的训练方案推荐提供了有价值的见解。