Suppr超能文献

在瑞典从事职业健康服务工作的专业人员对跨专业团队合作的看法。

Perceptions of interprofessional team collaboration among professionals working in the occupational health service in Sweden.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, SE-70182, Sweden.

出版信息

J Occup Health. 2024 Jan 4;66(1). doi: 10.1093/joccuh/uiad009.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) among professionals in occupational health (OH) services is crucial when rendering a service to clients and customers. The aim of this study was to describe and compare perceptions relating to IPC among professionals working as OH providers in Sweden.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study with a descriptive and comparative design included 456 respondents representing different OH professions in Sweden. Data were collected using the Swedish short version of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale adapted for OH ([AITCS]-SII[OH]), with its 3 subscales Partnership, Cooperation, and Coordination, and were analyzed and presented descriptively. Items and sum scores were dichotomized into inadequate and adequate and compared between sexes, workplaces, types of employment, and professions.

RESULTS

According to the responses, items related to openness, honesty, and trust were perceived as adequate among the respondents. The findings show that perceptions about IPC differed among the professions. The perception of IPC also differed between different types of organizations.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show diverse perceptions between professionals and organizations. The perception of IPC may be influenced by the professional's education in occupational safety and health. Study findings may be used to support further development of IPC in the OH service for the benefit of the clients. To develop IPC in the best interests of both professionals and customers/clients, further studies need to be performed to gain a deeper understanding of IPC in the OH context.

摘要

目的

在提供客户和顾客服务时,职业健康(OH)服务中专业人员之间的跨专业合作(IPC)至关重要。本研究旨在描述和比较在瑞典从事 OH 服务的专业人员对 IPC 的看法。

方法

这是一项具有描述性和比较性设计的横断面研究,包括代表瑞典不同 OH 专业的 456 名受访者。使用经过改编的瑞典职业健康职业人员的《评估跨专业团队合作量表》([AITCS]-SII[OH])的简短瑞典语版本收集数据,该量表有 3 个子量表,即伙伴关系、合作和协调,并进行了分析和描述性呈现。项目和总分被分为不足和充足,并在性别、工作场所、就业类型和专业之间进行比较。

结果

根据受访者的回答,与开放性、诚实和信任相关的项目被认为是足够的。调查结果表明,IPC 在专业人员之间的看法存在差异。IPC 的看法也因不同类型的组织而异。

结论

结果显示专业人员和组织之间存在不同的看法。IPC 的看法可能受到职业安全与健康教育的影响。研究结果可用于支持 OH 服务中 IPC 的进一步发展,以造福客户。为了在 OH 背景下为专业人员和客户/客户的利益发展 IPC,需要进一步研究以更深入地了解 IPC。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec5/11254301/c1edc6b9f65b/uiad009f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验