Suppr超能文献

莫达非尼和咖啡因对有限睡眠剥夺期后易疲劳和抗疲劳机组人员影响的比较。

Comparison of effects of modafinil and caffeine on fatigue-vulnerable and fatigue-resistant aircrew after a limited period of sleep deprivation.

作者信息

Wingelaar-Jagt Yara Q, Wingelaar Thijs T, Riedel Wim J, Ramaekers Johannes G

机构信息

Center for Man in Aviation, Royal Netherlands Air Force, Soesterberg, Netherlands.

Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2024 Jan 8;14:1303758. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1303758. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Literature suggests pilots experience fatigue differently. So-called fatigue-resistant or -vulnerable individuals might also respond differently to countermeasures or stimulants. This study, which is part of a larger randomized controlled clinical trial, aims to investigate the effect of caffeine and modafinil on fatigue-resistant and -vulnerable pilots. This study included 32 healthy employees of the Royal Netherlands Air Force, who completed three test days, separated by at least 7 days. After a regular work day, the subjects were randomly administered either 300 mg caffeine, 200 mg modafinil or placebo at midnight. Hereafter the subjects performed the psychomotor vigilance test (PVT), vigilance and tracking test (VigTrack) and Stanford sleepiness scale (SSS) six times until 8 a.m. the next day. Subjects were ranked on the average number of lapses on the PVT during the placebo night and divided into three groups: fatigue-vulnerable (F), -intermediate (FINT) and -resistant (F), with 11, 10 and 11 subjects in each group, respectively. Area under the curve (AUC) of the PVT, VigTrack and SSS during the test nights were calculated, which were used in univariate factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA). Tukey's HSD tests were used to differentiate between the groups. A significant effect of treatment was found in the ANOVA of both PVT parameters, VigTrack mean reaction time and SSS. There was a statistically significant effect of fatigue group on all PVT parameters and VigTrack mean percentage omissions, where F and F scored better than F. There was a significant interaction effect between treatment and fatigue group for PVT number of lapses. This is congruent for the AUC analyses in which for all parameters (except for the SSS) the performance of the F group was consistently worse than that of the F and F groups. This study demonstrates that the performance of individuals with different fatigue tolerances are differently affected by simulants after a limited period of sleep deprivation. The classification of fatigue tolerance through PVT lapses when sleep deprived seems to be able to predict this.

摘要

文献表明飞行员经历疲劳的方式有所不同。所谓的抗疲劳或易疲劳个体对对策或兴奋剂的反应也可能不同。本研究是一项更大规模随机对照临床试验的一部分,旨在调查咖啡因和莫达非尼对耐疲劳和易疲劳飞行员的影响。本研究纳入了32名荷兰皇家空军的健康员工,他们完成了三个测试日,间隔至少7天。在正常工作日后,受试者在午夜被随机给予300毫克咖啡因、200毫克莫达非尼或安慰剂。此后,受试者进行了心理运动警觉性测试(PVT)、警觉性和跟踪测试(VigTrack)以及斯坦福嗜睡量表(SSS),共六次,直至第二天上午8点。根据安慰剂夜间PVT的平均失误次数对受试者进行排名,并分为三组:易疲劳组(F)、中间组(FINT)和抗疲劳组(F),每组分别有11名、10名和11名受试者。计算测试夜间PVT、VigTrack和SSS的曲线下面积(AUC),用于单因素方差分析(ANOVA)。使用Tukey's HSD检验对各组进行区分。在PVT参数、VigTrack平均反应时间和SSS的方差分析中均发现了治疗的显著效果。疲劳组对所有PVT参数和VigTrack平均遗漏百分比有统计学显著影响,其中F和F组的表现优于F组。PVT失误次数的治疗与疲劳组之间存在显著的交互作用。这与AUC分析结果一致,即对于所有参数(除SSS外),F组的表现始终比F组和F组差。本研究表明,在有限的睡眠剥夺期后,不同疲劳耐受性个体的表现受兴奋剂的影响不同。睡眠剥夺时通过PVT失误次数对疲劳耐受性进行分类似乎能够预测这一点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/712c/10800817/9b0b935c1647/fphys-14-1303758-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验