Grošelj Aleš, Tancer Ivana, Jerman Anže, Paučič Jošt, Pušnik Luka
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 8;13:1284266. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1284266. eCollection 2023.
Several techniques have been employed for defect reconstruction after total laryngectomy, among others sliding epiglottoplasty. As there is a paucity of data on sliding epiglottoplasty after total laryngectomy, this study aimed to present this reconstruction technique in detail with the retrospective analysis of the patients.
We retrospectively reviewed single-center medical records of patients who underwent pharyngeal reconstruction after total laryngectomy between 2007-2013, with a follow-up to 2020. The study included patients who had total laryngectomy performed followed by a primary closure or sliding epiglottoplasty. The patients were divided according to the pharyngeal reconstruction technique: sliding epiglottis ( = 38) and primary closure ( = 120).
The baseline characteristics of patients, TNM stages, and previous treatment strategies did not differ significantly between the sliding epiglottis and primary closure group. The postoperative complication rates, including the pharyngocutaneous fistulae formation and strictures were comparable between the analyzed groups; however, a slightly higher incidence of pharyngocutaneus fistulae was noted within the patients after sliding epiglottoplasty. Overall 3-year survival of patients who underwent the epiglottoplasty and primary closure group were 73.7% . 57.5%, respectively.
Sliding epiglottoplasty is considered a safe reconstruction technique. Although slightly better outcomes were noted within the epiglottoplasty group, it is still considered inferior to the primary closure. This technique ought to be considered in meticulously selected patients in whom primary closure is not feasible, epiglottis with nearby structures is spared from disease, and when the distal flaps are less appropriate or contraindicated.
全喉切除术后缺损重建已采用多种技术,其中包括滑动会厌成形术。由于全喉切除术后滑动会厌成形术的数据较少,本研究旨在通过对患者的回顾性分析详细介绍这种重建技术。
我们回顾性分析了2007年至2013年间在单中心接受全喉切除术后咽重建患者的病历,并随访至2020年。该研究纳入了接受全喉切除术后一期缝合或滑动会厌成形术的患者。根据咽重建技术将患者分为:滑动会厌组(n = 38)和一期缝合组(n = 120)。
滑动会厌组和一期缝合组患者的基线特征、TNM分期和既往治疗策略无显著差异。分析组之间的术后并发症发生率,包括咽皮肤瘘形成和狭窄相当;然而,滑动会厌成形术后患者的咽皮肤瘘发生率略高。接受会厌成形术和一期缝合组患者的总体3年生存率分别为73.7%和57.5%。
滑动会厌成形术被认为是一种安全的重建技术。尽管会厌成形术组的结果略好,但仍被认为不如一期缝合。在精心挑选的患者中,如果一期缝合不可行、会厌及其附近结构未受疾病影响且远端皮瓣不太合适或禁忌时,应考虑采用这种技术。