Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
MR Scientific Marketing, Siemens Healthineers Ltd., 200129 Shanghai, China.
Br J Radiol. 2024 Jan 23;97(1153):135-141. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqad003.
To differentiate high-grade from low-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) using diffusion-relaxation correlation spectroscopic imaging (DR-CSI) spectra in an equal separating analysis.
Eighty patients with 86 pathologically confirmed ccRCCs who underwent DR-CSI were enrolled. Two radiologists delineated the region of interest. The spectrum was derived based on DR-CSI and was further segmented into multiple equal subregions from 22 to 99. The agreement between the 2 radiologists was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Logistic regression was used to establish the regression model for differentiation, and 5-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate its accuracy. McNemar's test was used to compare the diagnostic performance between equipartition models and the traditional parameters, including the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and T2 value.
The inter-reader agreement decreased as the divisions in the equipartition model increased (overall ICC ranged from 0.859 to 0.920). The accuracy increased from the 22 to 99 equipartition model (0.68 for 22, 0.69 for 33 and 44, 0.70 for 55, 0.71 for 66, 0.78 for 77, and 0.75 for 88 and 99). The equipartition models with divisions >7*7 were significantly better than ADC and T2 (vs ADC: P = .002-.008; vs T2: P = .001-.004).
The equipartition method has the potential to analyse the DR-CSI spectrum and discriminate between low-grade and high-grade ccRCC.
The evaluation of DR-CSI relies on prior knowledge, and how to assess the spectrum derived from DR-CSI without prior knowledge has not been well studied.
通过等分割分析,利用扩散弛豫相关波谱成像(DR-CSI)谱区分高级别和低级别透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)。
纳入 80 例经病理证实的 86 例 ccRCC 患者,行 DR-CSI 检查。两位放射科医生勾画出感兴趣区。基于 DR-CSI 得出谱图,并进一步将其分割成 22 至 99 的多个相等亚区。采用组内相关系数(ICC)评估两位放射科医生之间的一致性。采用 Logistic 回归建立用于区分的回归模型,并采用 5 折交叉验证评估其准确性。采用 McNemar 检验比较等分区模型和传统参数(表观扩散系数(ADC)和 T2 值)的诊断性能。
随着等分区模型的划分增加,读者间的一致性降低(整体 ICC 范围为 0.859 至 0.920)。从 22 至 99 等分区模型的准确性逐渐增加(22 为 0.68,33 和 44 为 0.69,55 为 0.70,66 为 0.71,77 为 0.78,88 和 99 为 0.75)。分区>7*7 的等分区模型明显优于 ADC 和 T2(与 ADC 相比:P = .002-.008;与 T2 相比:P = .001-.004)。
分区法有可能分析 DR-CSI 光谱,并区分低级别和高级别 ccRCC。
DR-CSI 的评估依赖于先验知识,如何在没有先验知识的情况下评估从 DR-CSI 得出的光谱尚未得到很好的研究。