• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在网络战场上大规模控制恶意人工智能活动。

Controlling bad-actor-artificial intelligence activity at scale across online battlefields.

作者信息

Johnson Neil F, Sear Richard, Illari Lucia

机构信息

Dynamic Online Networks Laboratory, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.

出版信息

PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jan 23;3(1):pgae004. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae004. eCollection 2024 Jan.

DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae004
PMID:38264146
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10805610/
Abstract

We consider the looming threat of bad actors using artificial intelligence (AI)/Generative Pretrained Transformer to generate harms across social media globally. Guided by our detailed mapping of the online multiplatform battlefield, we offer answers to the key questions of what bad-actor-AI activity will likely dominate, where, when-and what might be done to control it at scale. Applying a dynamical Red Queen analysis from prior studies of cyber and automated algorithm attacks, predicts an escalation to daily bad-actor-AI activity by mid-2024-just ahead of United States and other global elections. We then use an exactly solvable mathematical model of the observed bad-actor community clustering dynamics, to build a Policy Matrix which quantifies the outcomes and trade-offs between two potentially desirable outcomes: containment of future bad-actor-AI activity vs. its complete removal. We also give explicit plug-and-play formulae for associated risk measures.

摘要

我们考虑到恶意行为者利用人工智能(AI)/生成式预训练变换器在全球社交媒体上造成危害的潜在威胁。在我们对在线多平台战场的详细映射的指导下,我们回答了关键问题:哪些恶意行为者的人工智能活动可能占主导地位、在何处、何时发生,以及可以采取哪些措施来大规模控制它。应用先前对网络和自动算法攻击研究中的动态红皇后分析,预测到2024年年中,恶意行为者的人工智能活动将升级为每日发生,就在美国和其他全球选举之前。然后,我们使用观察到的恶意行为者社区聚类动态的精确可解数学模型,构建一个政策矩阵,该矩阵量化了两个潜在理想结果之间的结果和权衡:遏制未来恶意行为者的人工智能活动与彻底消除它。我们还给出了相关风险度量的明确即插即用公式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877a/10805610/dc819f7c5a8d/pgae004f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877a/10805610/30c5d482dac5/pgae004f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877a/10805610/d0ad8a757f9a/pgae004f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877a/10805610/330a8e51072e/pgae004f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877a/10805610/dc819f7c5a8d/pgae004f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877a/10805610/30c5d482dac5/pgae004f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877a/10805610/d0ad8a757f9a/pgae004f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877a/10805610/330a8e51072e/pgae004f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877a/10805610/dc819f7c5a8d/pgae004f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Controlling bad-actor-artificial intelligence activity at scale across online battlefields.在网络战场上大规模控制恶意人工智能活动。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jan 23;3(1):pgae004. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae004. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Generative artificial intelligence to produce high-fidelity blastocyst-stage embryo images.生成式人工智能生成高保真囊胚期胚胎图像。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Jun 3;39(6):1197-1207. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae064.
3
The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making.生成式人工智能对社会经济不平等和政策制定的影响。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jun 11;3(6):pgae191. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae191. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
The Picasso's skepticism on computer science and the dawn of generative AI: questions after the answers to keep "machines-in-the-loop".毕加索对计算机科学的怀疑与生成式人工智能的黎明:“机器在回路中”的追问与回答之后的问题
Eur Radiol Exp. 2024 Jul 24;8(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s41747-024-00485-7.
6
Search Engines and Generative Artificial Intelligence Integration: Public Health Risks and Recommendations to Safeguard Consumers Online.搜索引擎与生成式人工智能整合:保障在线消费者安全的公共健康风险与建议。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Mar 21;10:e53086. doi: 10.2196/53086.
7
Medical Ethics and Artificial Intelligence in Neurosurgery-How Should We Prepare?神经外科中的医学伦理与人工智能:我们应如何准备?
World Neurosurg. 2024 Jul;187:e199-e209. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.067. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
8
Ethics of using generative pretrained transformer and artificial intelligence systems for patient prior authorizations.使用生成式预训练变换器和人工智能系统进行患者预先授权的伦理问题。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024 May;90(5):1121-1122. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.04.030. Epub 2023 Apr 22.
9
Generative pretrained transformer-4, an artificial intelligence text predictive model, has a high capability for passing novel written radiology exam questions.生成式预训练转换器-4,一种人工智能文本预测模型,具有通过新型书面放射科考试问题的高能力。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2024 Apr;19(4):645-653. doi: 10.1007/s11548-024-03071-9. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
10
Adopting and expanding ethical principles for generative artificial intelligence from military to healthcare.将生成式人工智能的伦理原则从军事领域应用并扩展至医疗保健领域。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Dec 2;6(1):225. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00965-x.

引用本文的文献

1
AI-driven disinformation: policy recommendations for democratic resilience.人工智能驱动的虚假信息:增强民主韧性的政策建议
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Jul 31;8:1569115. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1569115. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing.脸书上志同道合的消息源很常见,但不会造成两极分化。
Nature. 2023 Aug;620(7972):137-144. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06297-w. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
2
Democracy Intercepted.民主受阻。
Science. 2023 Jul 28;381(6656):386-387. doi: 10.1126/science.adj7023. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
3
Reshares on social media amplify political news but do not detectably affect beliefs or opinions.社交媒体上的转发放大了政治新闻,但并没有明显影响到人们的信仰或观点。
Science. 2023 Jul 28;381(6656):404-408. doi: 10.1126/science.add8424. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
4
Asymmetric ideological segregation in exposure to political news on Facebook.在 Facebook 上接触政治新闻时存在不对称的意识形态隔离。
Science. 2023 Jul 28;381(6656):392-398. doi: 10.1126/science.ade7138. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
5
How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign?社交媒体的推荐算法如何影响选举活动中的态度和行为?
Science. 2023 Jul 28;381(6656):398-404. doi: 10.1126/science.abp9364. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
6
ChatGPT broke the Turing test - the race is on for new ways to assess AI.ChatGPT 通过了图灵测试——评估人工智能新方法的竞争已经展开。
Nature. 2023 Jul;619(7971):686-689. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-02361-7.
7
Shockwavelike Behavior across Social Media.社交媒体上的冲击波式行为。
Phys Rev Lett. 2023 Jun 9;130(23):237401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.237401.
8
Offline events and online hate.线下活动与网络仇恨
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 25;18(1):e0278511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278511. eCollection 2023.
9
Safe space: online groups lift up women in tech.安全空间:在线群组助力科技领域女性发展。
Nature. 2022 Nov;611(7937):839-841. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-03798-y.
10
Partisan asymmetries in exposure to misinformation.党派之间在接触错误信息方面的不对称性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 19;12(1):15671. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19837-7.