Division of Radiation Oncology, Kobe Minimally Invasive Cancer Center, 8-5-1 Minatojima-nakamachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0046, Japan.
Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2024 Jun;47(2):465-475. doi: 10.1007/s13246-023-01377-7. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has become a popular choice for breast cancer treatment. We aimed to evaluate and compare the robustness of each optimization method used for breast IMRT using TomoTherapy. A retrospective analysis was performed on 10 patients with left breast cancer. For each optimization method (clipping, virtual bolus, and skin flash), a corresponding 50 Gy/25 fr plan was created in the helical and direct TomoTherapy modes. The dose-volume histogram parameters were compared after shifting the patients anteriorly and posteriorly. In the helical mode, when the patient was not shifted, the median D1cc (minimum dose delivered to 1 cc of the organ volume) of the breast skin for the clipping and virtual bolus plans was 52.2 (interquartile range: 51.9-52.6) and 50.4 (50.1-50.8) Gy, respectively. After an anterior shift, D1cc of the breast skin for the clipping and virtual bolus plans was 56.0 (55.6-56.8) and 50.9 (50.5-51.3) Gy, respectively. When the direct mode was used without shifting the patient, D1cc of the breast skin for the clipping, virtual bolus, and skin flash plans was 52.6 (51.9-53.1), 53.4 (52.6-53.9), and 52.3 (51.7-53.0) Gy, respectively. After shifting anteriorly, D1cc of the breast skin for the clipping, virtual bolus, and skin flash plans was 55.6 (54.1-56.4), 52.4 (52.0-53.0), and 53.6 (52.6-54.6) Gy, respectively. The clipping method is not sufficient for breast IMRT. The virtual bolus and skin flash methods were more robust optimization methods according to our analyses.
调强放射治疗(IMRT)已成为乳腺癌治疗的热门选择。我们旨在评估和比较 TomoTherapy 用于乳腺癌调强放疗的每种优化方法的稳健性。对 10 例左侧乳腺癌患者进行回顾性分析。对于每种优化方法(剪辑、虚拟贴块和皮肤闪光),在螺旋和直接 TomoTherapy 模式下创建相应的 50 Gy/25 fr 计划。在前后移动患者后,比较剂量-体积直方图参数。在螺旋模式下,当患者未移动时,剪辑和虚拟贴块计划的乳房皮肤 D1cc(器官体积 1cc 所接受的最小剂量)中位数分别为 52.2(四分位距:51.9-52.6)和 50.4(50.1-50.8)Gy。在前移后,剪辑和虚拟贴块计划的乳房皮肤 D1cc 分别为 56.0(55.6-56.8)和 50.9(50.5-51.3)Gy。当直接模式在不移动患者的情况下使用时,剪辑、虚拟贴块和皮肤闪光计划的乳房皮肤 D1cc 分别为 52.6(51.9-53.1)、53.4(52.6-53.9)和 52.3(51.7-53.0)Gy。在前移后,剪辑、虚拟贴块和皮肤闪光计划的乳房皮肤 D1cc 分别为 55.6(54.1-56.4)、52.4(52.0-53.0)和 53.6(52.6-54.6)Gy。剪辑方法对于乳房调强放疗不足。根据我们的分析,虚拟贴块和皮肤闪光方法是更稳健的优化方法。