Mental Health Center and Psychiatric Laboratory, The State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; Huaxi Brain Research Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Mental Health Center and Psychiatric Laboratory, The State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; Huaxi Brain Research Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
J Affect Disord. 2024 Apr 15;351:259-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.173. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
Previous neuroimaging studies have reported structural and functional brain abnormalities in major depressive disorder (MDD). This study aimed to explore whether the coherence of structural-functional networks was affected by disease and investigate its correlation with clinical manifestations.
The severity of symptoms and cognitive function of 121 MDD patients and 139 healthy controls (HC) were assessed, and imaging data, including diffusion tensor imaging, T1 structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and resting-state functional MRI, were collected. Spearman correlation coefficients of Kullback-Leibler similarity (KLS), fiber number (FN), fractional anisotropy (FA) and functional connectivity (FC) were calculated as coupling coefficients. Double-weight median correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the correlations between differences in brain networks and clinical assessments.
The percentage of total correct response of delayed matching to sample and the percentage of delayed correct response of pattern recognition memory was lower in MDD. Compared with the HC, KLS-FC coupling between the parietal lobe and subcortical area, FA-FC coupling between the temporal and parietal lobe, and FN-FC coupling in the frontal lobe was lower in MDD. Several correlations between structural-functional connectivity and clinical manifestations were identified.
First, our study lacks longitudinal follow-up data. Second, the sample size was relatively small. Moreover, we only used the Anatomical Automatic Labeling template to construct the brain network. Finally, the validation of the causal relationship of neuroimaging-behavior factors was still insufficient.
The alternation in structural-functional coupling were related to clinical characterization and might be involved in the neuropathology of depression.
先前的神经影像学研究报告了重度抑郁症(MDD)患者存在结构和功能脑异常。本研究旨在探讨结构性-功能性网络的一致性是否受疾病影响,并研究其与临床表现的相关性。
评估了 121 名 MDD 患者和 139 名健康对照者(HC)的症状严重程度和认知功能,采集了扩散张量成像、T1 结构磁共振成像(MRI)和静息态功能 MRI 等影像学数据。采用 Kullback-Leibler 相似性(KLS)、纤维数量(FN)、各向异性分数(FA)和功能连接(FC)的 Spearman 相关系数作为连接系数。采用双权重中位数相关分析来研究脑网络差异与临床评估之间的相关性。
MDD 患者的延迟匹配样本总正确反应率和模式识别记忆延迟正确反应率较低。与 HC 相比,MDD 患者的顶叶和皮质下区域之间的 KLS-FC 连接、颞叶和顶叶之间的 FA-FC 连接以及额叶的 FN-FC 连接降低。确定了结构-功能连接与临床表现之间的一些相关性。
首先,我们的研究缺乏纵向随访数据。其次,样本量相对较小。此外,我们仅使用解剖自动标记模板构建脑网络。最后,神经影像学-行为因素因果关系的验证仍然不足。
结构性-功能性连接的改变与临床特征有关,可能与抑郁症的神经病理学有关。