Suppr超能文献

单侧前交叉韧带断裂或重建术后一年患者的双侧神经肌肉控制。一项横断面研究。

Bilateral neuromuscular control in patients one year after unilateral ACL rupture or reconstruction. A cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Blasimann Angela, Busch Aglaja, Henle Philipp, Bruhn Sven, Vissers Dirk, Baur Heiner

机构信息

Bern University of Applied Sciences, School of Health Professions, Division of Physiotherapy, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.

University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Jan 11;10(2):e24364. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24364. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare bilateral neuromuscular control in patients one year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) or conservative treatment (ACL-C) to healthy controls (ACL-I).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Electromyography of vastus medialis (VM) and lateralis (VL), biceps femoris (BF) and semitendinosus (ST) was recorded during stair descent and anterior tibial translation. Each step of stair descent was divided into pre-activity, weight-acceptance and push-off phase. Pre-activation, short, medium (MLR) and long latency responses (LLR) were defined for reflex activity.

PARTICIPANTS

N = 38 patients one year after ACL reconstruction (ACL-R), N = 26 participants with conservative treatment one year after ACL rupture (ACL-C), N = 38 healthy controls with an intact ACL (ACL-I).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Normalized root mean squares per muscle and phase (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

During stair descent, within-group leg differences were found for the quadriceps in ACL-R during all phases and for the BF in ACL-C during weight-acceptance. Between-group leg differences were found for BF in both patient groups compared to ACL-I during push-off.Between-group differences in pre-activation for VM between ACL-R and ACL-C, and between ACL-C and ACL-I were found, and as LLR between patients and ACL-R versus ACL-I. Pre-activation of BF and MLR of ST differed for each patient group compared to ACL-I.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral neuromuscular alterations are still present one year after ACL rupture or reconstruction.

摘要

目的

比较前交叉韧带重建(ACL-R)或保守治疗(ACL-C)一年后的患者与健康对照者(ACL-I)的双侧神经肌肉控制情况。

设计

横断面研究。

设置

在楼梯下行和胫骨前移过程中记录股内侧肌(VM)、股外侧肌(VL)、股二头肌(BF)和半腱肌(ST)的肌电图。楼梯下行的每一步分为活动前、承重和蹬离阶段。为反射活动定义了预激活、短、中(MLR)和长潜伏期反应(LLR)。

参与者

38例ACL重建术后一年的患者(ACL-R),26例ACL断裂后接受保守治疗一年的参与者(ACL-C),38例ACL完整的健康对照者(ACL-I)。

主要观察指标

每块肌肉和阶段的标准化均方根(α = 0.05)。

结果

在楼梯下行过程中,ACL-R组股四头肌在所有阶段均存在组内腿间差异,ACL-C组BF在承重阶段存在组内腿间差异。在蹬离阶段,与ACL-I相比,两个患者组的BF均存在组间腿间差异。ACL-R与ACL-C之间以及ACL-C与ACL-I之间VM的预激活存在组间差异,患者与ACL-R相对于ACL-I之间的LLR也存在组间差异。与ACL-I相比,每个患者组的BF预激活和ST的MLR均不同。

结论

ACL断裂或重建一年后仍存在双侧神经肌肉改变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e470/10803901/6d99aa3f45e4/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验