• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用分类算法预测糖尿病足患者的截肢风险:一项来自三级中心的临床研究。

Prediction of amputation risk of patients with diabetic foot using classification algorithms: A clinical study from a tertiary center.

作者信息

Demirkol Denizhan, Erol Çiğdem Selçukcan, Tannier Xavier, Özcan Tuncay, Aktaş Şamil

机构信息

Faculty of Engineering, Department of Computer Engineering, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey.

Science Faculty, Department of Biology, Division of Botany & Department of Informatics, Istanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2024 Jan;21(1):e14556. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14556.

DOI:10.1111/iwj.14556
PMID:38272802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10789580/
Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers can have vital consequences, such as amputation for patients. The primary purpose of this study is to predict the amputation risk of diabetic foot patients using machine-learning classification algorithms. In this research, 407 patients treated with the diagnosis of diabetic foot between January 2009-September 2019 in Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine in the Department of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine were retrospectively evaluated. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to identify the key features associated with the amputation risk in diabetic foot patients within the dataset. Thus, various prediction/classification models were created to predict the "overall" risk of diabetic foot patients. Predictive machine-learning models were created using various algorithms. Additionally to optimize the hyperparameters of the Random Forest Algorithm (RF), experimental use of Bayesian Optimization (BO) has been employed. The sub-dimension data set comprising categorical and numerical values was subjected to a feature selection procedure. Among all the algorithms tested under the defined experimental conditions, the BO-optimized "RF" based on the hybrid approach (PCA-RF-BO) and "Logistic Regression" algorithms demonstrated superior performance with 85% and 90% test accuracies, respectively. In conclusion, our findings would serve as an essential benchmark, offering valuable guidance in reducing such hazards.

摘要

糖尿病足溃疡可能会给患者带来严重后果,比如截肢。本研究的主要目的是使用机器学习分类算法预测糖尿病足患者的截肢风险。在这项研究中,我们对2009年1月至2019年9月期间在伊斯坦布尔大学医学院水下与高压医学系接受糖尿病足诊断治疗的407例患者进行了回顾性评估。主成分分析(PCA)用于识别数据集中与糖尿病足患者截肢风险相关的关键特征。因此,创建了各种预测/分类模型来预测糖尿病足患者的“总体”风险。使用各种算法创建了预测性机器学习模型。此外,为了优化随机森林算法(RF)的超参数,还采用了贝叶斯优化(BO)进行实验。对包含分类值和数值的子维度数据集进行了特征选择过程。在定义的实验条件下测试的所有算法中,基于混合方法(PCA-RF-BO)的BO优化“RF”和“逻辑回归”算法分别以85%和90%的测试准确率表现出卓越性能。总之,我们的研究结果将作为一个重要的基准,为降低此类风险提供有价值的指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7347/10789580/eac334d1b507/IWJ-21-e14556-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7347/10789580/db02e64311b1/IWJ-21-e14556-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7347/10789580/562290df0ce7/IWJ-21-e14556-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7347/10789580/3af843529df4/IWJ-21-e14556-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7347/10789580/06e38fff6433/IWJ-21-e14556-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7347/10789580/eac334d1b507/IWJ-21-e14556-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7347/10789580/db02e64311b1/IWJ-21-e14556-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7347/10789580/562290df0ce7/IWJ-21-e14556-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7347/10789580/3af843529df4/IWJ-21-e14556-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7347/10789580/06e38fff6433/IWJ-21-e14556-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7347/10789580/eac334d1b507/IWJ-21-e14556-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of amputation risk of patients with diabetic foot using classification algorithms: A clinical study from a tertiary center.使用分类算法预测糖尿病足患者的截肢风险:一项来自三级中心的临床研究。
Int Wound J. 2024 Jan;21(1):e14556. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14556.
2
Development of Predictive Nomograms for Clinical Use to Quantify the Risk of Amputation in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcer.开发用于临床使用的预测列线图,以量化糖尿病足溃疡患者截肢风险。
J Diabetes Res. 2021 Jan 14;2021:6621035. doi: 10.1155/2021/6621035. eCollection 2021.
3
Establishment and Reliability Evaluation of Prognostic Models in Diabetic Foot.糖尿病足预后模型的建立与可靠性评价。
Altern Ther Health Med. 2023 Nov;29(8):534-539.
4
Development and Evaluation of a Bayesian Risk Stratification Method for Major Amputations in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers.开发和评估用于糖尿病足溃疡患者主要截肢的贝叶斯风险分层方法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jan 14;289:212-215. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210897.
5
An explainable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital amputation rate of patients with diabetic foot ulcer.一种用于预测糖尿病足溃疡患者院内截肢率的可解释机器学习模型。
Int Wound J. 2022 May;19(4):910-918. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13691. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
6
Clinical profiles of diabetic foot ulcer patients undergoing major limb amputation at a tertiary care center in North-eastern Tanzania.在坦桑尼亚东北部的一家三级护理中心,对接受大肢体截肢的糖尿病足溃疡患者的临床特征进行分析。
BMC Surg. 2021 Jan 12;21(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01051-3.
7
Machine Learning-Based Diabetic Neuropathy and Previous Foot Ulceration Patients Detection Using Electromyography and Ground Reaction Forces during Gait.基于机器学习的肌电图和步态中地面反力检测糖尿病周围神经病变和既往足部溃疡患者
Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 5;22(9):3507. doi: 10.3390/s22093507.
8
A Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Amputation in Diabetics.一种用于预测糖尿病患者截肢的机器学习模型。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):874-881. doi: 10.1177/19322968221142899. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
9
Poorly designed research does not help clarify the role of hyperbaric oxygen in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers.设计不佳的研究无助于阐明高压氧在慢性糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的作用。
Diving Hyperb Med. 2016 Sep;46(3):133-134.
10
A Novel Machine Learning Approach for Severity Classification of Diabetic Foot Complications Using Thermogram Images.一种基于热图图像的糖尿病足并发症严重程度分类的新型机器学习方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 2;22(11):4249. doi: 10.3390/s22114249.

引用本文的文献

1
DFU_DIALNet: Towards reliable and trustworthy diabetic foot ulcer detection with synergistic confluence of Grad-CAM and LIME.DFU_DIALNet:通过Grad-CAM和LIME的协同融合实现可靠且值得信赖的糖尿病足溃疡检测
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 2;20(9):e0330669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330669. eCollection 2025.
2
Machine learning for the prediction of diabetes-related amputation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.用于预测糖尿病相关截肢的机器学习:诊断试验准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Exp Med. 2025 May 10;25(1):151. doi: 10.1007/s10238-025-01697-w.
3
Artificial intelligence applied to diabetes complications: a bibliometric analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of risk factors for amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: a cohort study from a tertiary center.糖尿病足溃疡患者截肢风险因素分析:来自一家三级中心的队列研究。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2022 Sep;56(5):333-339. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2022.22052.
2
The amputation and mortality of inpatients with diabetic foot ulceration in the COVID-19 pandemic and postpandemic era: A machine learning study.在新冠疫情及疫情后时代,糖尿病足溃疡住院患者的截肢和死亡率:一项机器学习研究。
Int Wound J. 2022 Oct;19(6):1289-1297. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13723. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
3
An explainable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital amputation rate of patients with diabetic foot ulcer.
应用于糖尿病并发症的人工智能:一项文献计量分析。
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Jan 31;8:1455341. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1455341. eCollection 2025.
一种用于预测糖尿病足溃疡患者院内截肢率的可解释机器学习模型。
Int Wound J. 2022 May;19(4):910-918. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13691. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
4
Development of a model to predict closure of chronic wounds in Germany: Claims data analysis.开发一种预测德国慢性伤口闭合的模型:索赔数据分析。
Int Wound J. 2022 Jan;19(1):76-85. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13599. Epub 2021 May 5.
5
I tried a bunch of things: The dangers of unexpected overfitting in classification of brain data.我尝试了很多方法:大脑数据分类中意想不到的过度拟合的危险。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Dec;119:456-467. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.09.036. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
6
Focusing on Diabetic Ulcers.关注糖尿病溃疡
Transl Med UniSa. 2020 Feb 20;21:7-9. eCollection 2020 Jan-Apr.
7
Recognition of ischaemia and infection in diabetic foot ulcers: Dataset and techniques.糖尿病足溃疡中缺血和感染的识别:数据集与技术
Comput Biol Med. 2020 Feb;117:103616. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103616. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
8
Machine learning algorithm validation with a limited sample size.机器学习算法在有限样本量下的验证。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 7;14(11):e0224365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224365. eCollection 2019.
9
Predicting in-hospital mortality of patients with acute kidney injury in the ICU using random forest model.应用随机森林模型预测 ICU 中急性肾损伤患者的院内死亡率。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 May;125:55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
10
Using predictive analytics to identify drug-resistant epilepsy patients.运用预测分析来识别耐药性癫痫患者。
Health Informatics J. 2020 Mar;26(1):449-460. doi: 10.1177/1460458219833120. Epub 2019 Mar 12.