Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024 Jun;26(6):375-382. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0469.
Automated insulin delivery (AID) is now integral to the clinical practice of type 1 diabetes (T1D). The objective of this pilot-feasibility study was to introduce a new regulatory and clinical paradigm-a Neural-Net Artificial Pancreas (NAP)-an encoding of an AID algorithm into a neural network that approximates its action and assess NAP versus the original AID algorithm. The University of Virginia Model-Predictive Control (UMPC) algorithm was encoded into a neural network, creating its NAP approximation. Seventeen AID users with T1D were recruited and 15 participated in two consecutive 20-h hotel sessions, receiving in random order either NAP or UMPC. Their demographic characteristics were ages 22-68 years old, duration of diabetes 7-58 years, gender 10/5 female/male, White Non-Hispanic/Black 13/2, and baseline glycated hemoglobin 5.4%-8.1%. The time-in-range (TIR) difference between NAP and UMPC, adjusted for entry glucose level, was 1 percentage point, with absolute TIR values of 86% (NAP) and 87% (UMPC). The two algorithms achieved similar times <70 mg/dL of 2.0% versus 1.8% and coefficients of variation of 29.3% (NAP) versus 29.1 (UMPC)%. Under identical inputs, the average absolute insulin-recommendation difference was 0.031 U/h. There were no serious adverse events on either controller. NAP had sixfold lower computational demands than UMPC. In a randomized crossover study, a neural-network encoding of a complex model-predictive control algorithm demonstrated similar performance, at a fraction of the computational demands. Regulatory and clinical doors are therefore open for contemporary machine-learning methods to enter the AID field. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT05876273.
自动胰岛素输送(AID)现在是 1 型糖尿病(T1D)临床实践不可或缺的一部分。本先导可行性研究的目的是引入一种新的监管和临床范式——神经网络人工胰腺(NAP)——即将 AID 算法编码为神经网络,以模拟其作用,并评估 NAP 与原始 AID 算法的效果。弗吉尼亚大学模型预测控制(UMPC)算法被编码到神经网络中,创建了它的 NAP 近似。招募了 17 名 T1D 的 AID 用户,其中 15 名参与者连续参加了两次 20 小时的酒店会议,随机接受 NAP 或 UMPC。他们的人口统计学特征为年龄 22-68 岁,糖尿病病程 7-58 年,性别 10/5 女性/男性,白种非西班牙裔/黑种人 13/2,糖化血红蛋白基线水平为 5.4%-8.1%。NAP 和 UMPC 的时间范围内(TIR)差异,调整了初始血糖水平,为 1 个百分点,TIR 值分别为 86%(NAP)和 87%(UMPC)。两种算法实现了类似的<70mg/dL 时间,分别为 2.0%和 1.8%,变异系数分别为 29.3%(NAP)和 29.1%(UMPC)。在相同的输入下,平均绝对胰岛素推荐差异为 0.031U/h。两种控制器均未出现严重不良事件。NAP 的计算需求比 UMPC 低六倍。在一项随机交叉研究中,一种复杂的模型预测控制算法的神经网络编码表现出相似的性能,计算需求只是一小部分。因此,监管和临床领域为现代机器学习方法进入 AID 领域打开了大门。临床试验注册号:NCT05876273。