• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字经济对环境污染的影响:来自中国267个城市的证据。

The impact of digital economy on environmental pollution: Evidence from 267 cities in China.

作者信息

Yuan Honglin, Liu Jia, Li Xiaona, Zhong Shen

机构信息

Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, China.

Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jan 26;19(1):e0297009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297009. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0297009
PMID:38277347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10817194/
Abstract

Environmental pollution has become a pressing global issue, severely threatening human health and ecosystems. As an emerging driver of economic development in countries worldwide, the digital economy (DE) has the potential to enhance resource utilization efficiency and promote the development of clean technologies, thereby reducing environmental pollution. Based on the panel data of 267 cities in China from 2012 to 2021, the spatial econometric model is used to test the impact of DE on environmental pollution. The mediating effect model is used to explore the transmission mechanism of DE affecting environmental pollution. The panel threshold model is used to examine the threshold effect of marketization. The results are as follows: (1) DE can significantly reduce environmental pollution. The conclusion is still valid after conducting robustness tests such as selecting historical data as instrumental variables and the "Broadband China" pilot as a quasi-natural experiment. (2) From the perspective of transmission mechanism, DE can reduce environmental pollution through green technology innovation and industrial structure upgrading. (3) From the perspective of spatial spillover effect, DE can reduce the environmental pollution level of surrounding cities. (4) From the perspective of threshold effect, DE has obvious market-oriented single threshold effect on environmental pollution. When the marketization level crosses the threshold of 11.6611, the emission reduction effect of DE is significant. (5) From the perspective of heterogeneity, DE has a heterogeneous impact on environmental pollution in cities with different geographic locations, resource endowments and administrative level. Regarding geographical heterogeneity, DE can effectively reduce environmental pollution in eastern and central regions, but has no significant impact on environmental pollution in western regions. Regarding the heterogeneity of resource endowment, compared to non-resource-based cities, resource-based cities suffer more from the negative effects of DE on their environment. Regarding the heterogeneity of administrative levels, compared with non-central cities, the DE of central cities has a greater emission reduction effect. Based on empirical results, this paper proposes strategic recommendations in areas such as enhancing the application of DE in emission reduction, upgrading industrial structures, promoting green technology innovation, and improving the level of marketization. This study not only enriches the research of DE and environmental pollution, but also provides a reference for the formulation of environmental pollution control policies.

摘要

环境污染已成为一个紧迫的全球性问题,严重威胁着人类健康和生态系统。作为全球各国经济发展的新兴驱动力,数字经济有潜力提高资源利用效率,促进清洁技术发展,从而减少环境污染。基于2012年至2021年中国267个城市的面板数据,运用空间计量模型检验数字经济对环境污染的影响。运用中介效应模型探究数字经济影响环境污染的传导机制。运用面板门槛模型考察市场化的门槛效应。结果如下:(1)数字经济能显著降低环境污染。在进行如选择历史数据作为工具变量以及“宽带中国”试点作为准自然实验等稳健性检验后,该结论仍然成立。(2)从传导机制来看,数字经济能通过绿色技术创新和产业结构升级减少环境污染。(3)从空间溢出效应来看,数字经济能降低周边城市的环境污染水平。(4)从门槛效应来看,数字经济对环境污染具有明显的市场化单门槛效应。当市场化水平跨越11.6611的门槛时,数字经济的减排效应显著。(5)从异质性来看,数字经济对不同地理位置、资源禀赋和行政级别的城市的环境污染有不同影响。关于地理异质性,数字经济能有效降低东部和中部地区的环境污染,但对西部地区的环境污染无显著影响。关于资源禀赋异质性,与非资源型城市相比,资源型城市受数字经济对其环境负面影响的影响更大。关于行政级别异质性,与非中心城市相比,中心城市的数字经济减排效果更大。基于实证结果,本文在加强数字经济在减排中的应用、升级产业结构、促进绿色技术创新和提高市场化水平等方面提出了战略建议。本研究不仅丰富了数字经济与环境污染的研究,也为环境污染控制政策的制定提供了参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/9cdf04721f1b/pone.0297009.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/0a5d12081ff9/pone.0297009.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/e2491e7c3a56/pone.0297009.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/002fc4602cb1/pone.0297009.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/8909c0a2391d/pone.0297009.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/091cd1333787/pone.0297009.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/e9b61324588e/pone.0297009.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/dde92fcdefdb/pone.0297009.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/7ce26322979d/pone.0297009.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/900f9b20007e/pone.0297009.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/9cdf04721f1b/pone.0297009.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/0a5d12081ff9/pone.0297009.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/e2491e7c3a56/pone.0297009.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/002fc4602cb1/pone.0297009.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/8909c0a2391d/pone.0297009.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/091cd1333787/pone.0297009.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/e9b61324588e/pone.0297009.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/dde92fcdefdb/pone.0297009.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/7ce26322979d/pone.0297009.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/900f9b20007e/pone.0297009.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/10817194/9cdf04721f1b/pone.0297009.g010.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of digital economy on environmental pollution: Evidence from 267 cities in China.数字经济对环境污染的影响:来自中国267个城市的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 26;19(1):e0297009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297009. eCollection 2024.
2
Does the construction of network infrastructure reduce environmental pollution?-evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in "Broadband China".网络基础设施建设是否减少了环境污染?——来自“宽带中国”的准自然实验证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(1):242-258. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22159-w. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
3
Can the digital economy development achieve the effect of pollution reduction? Evidence from Chinese Cities.数字经济发展能否实现减排效果?来自中国城市的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(29):74166-74185. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27584-z. Epub 2023 May 19.
4
Path to pollution and carbon reduction synergy from the perspective of the digital economy: Fresh evidence from 292 prefecture-level cities in China.从数字经济角度看污染与减碳协同路径:来自中国 292 个地级市的新证据。
Environ Res. 2024 Jul 1;252(Pt 4):119050. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119050. Epub 2024 May 8.
5
Re-evaluating the impact and mechanism of digital economy on regional pollution intensity from the perspective of spatial spillover.从空间溢出的角度重新评估数字经济对区域污染强度的影响和机制。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(6):9062-9077. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31794-w. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
6
The impact of the digital economy development on haze pollution: evidence from the perspective of factor marketization.数字经济发展对雾霾污染的影响:基于要素市场化视角的证据
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(12):35478-35491. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24706-x. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
7
Digital economy and environmental governance performance: empirical evidence from 275 cities in China.数字经济与环境治理绩效:来自中国275个城市的实证证据
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(10):26012-26031. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23646-w. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
8
Impact of digital economic development and environmental pollution on residents' health: an empirical analysis based on 279 prefecture-level cities in China.数字经济发展和环境污染对居民健康的影响:基于中国 279 个地级市的实证分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 26;23(1):959. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15788-4.
9
Environmental regulation and carbon emission efficiency: Evidence from pollution levy standards adjustment in China.环境规制与碳排放效率:来自中国污染收费标准调整的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 1;19(2):e0296642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296642. eCollection 2024.
10
Is the development of digital finance conducive to reducing haze pollution? Empirical evidence from 284 cities in China.数字金融的发展是否有助于减少雾霾污染?来自中国284个城市的实证证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(18):53478-53491. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25652-y. Epub 2023 Mar 1.

本文引用的文献

1
How does financial and manufacturing co-agglomeration affect environmental pollution? Evidence from China.金融与制造业的共同集聚如何影响环境污染?来自中国的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 1;325(Pt B):116544. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116544. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
2
How does digital economy affect carbon emissions? Evidence from global 60 countries.数字经济如何影响碳排放?来自全球60个国家的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Dec 15;852:158401. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158401. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
3
The spatial spillover effect and nonlinear relationship analysis between land resource misallocation and environmental pollution: Evidence from China.
土地资源错配与环境污染的空间溢出效应及非线性关系分析——来自中国的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Nov 1;321:115873. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115873. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
4
Influences and transmission mechanisms of financial agglomeration on environmental pollution.金融集聚对环境污染的影响及传递机制。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Feb 1;303:114136. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114136. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
5
Pollution haven or halo? The role of the energy transition in the impact of FDI on SO2 emissions.污染避难所还是光环?能源转型在外国直接投资对二氧化硫排放影响中的作用。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Apr 1;763:143002. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143002. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
6
Effects of the socio-economic influencing factors on SO pollution in Chinese cities: A spatial econometric analysis based on satellite observed data.社会经济因素对中国城市 SO2 污染的影响:基于卫星观测数据的空间计量分析。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Aug 15;268:110667. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110667. Epub 2020 May 5.
7
Does biomass energy consumption help to control environmental pollution? Evidence from BRICS countries.生物质能源消费能否有助于控制环境污染?来自金砖国家的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jun 20;670:1075-1083. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.268. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
8
Decoupling China's economic growth from carbon emissions: Empirical studies from 30 Chinese provinces (2001-2015).中国经济增长与碳排放脱钩:来自 30 个省份(2001-2015 年)的实证研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 15;656:576-588. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.384. Epub 2018 Nov 27.