Department of Psychology (B.M., H.M.V., M.H.), Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Department of Medical Social Sciences (L.M.P.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Medicine (L.M.P.), Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 May;67(5):e393-e398. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.01.030. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
Gender and personality may individually impact end-of-life care. Men often receive more aggressive treatments than women near death, and personality - particularly openness - may be associated with increased care utilization when it diverges from traditional treatment norms. However, research has not examined the interaction of these variables in a dyadic context.
This study examined the dyadic effects of patient gender and caregiver personality on end-of-life care.
Using data from the VOICE randomized clinical trial, the present sample consisted of patient-caregiver dyads receiving outpatient care for advanced cancer in Sacramento and Western New York. Analyses assessed whether caregiver personality was associated with gender-based differences in patient chemotherapy or emergency department/inpatient visits in the 30 days before death. Logistic regression examined the interaction between caregivers' Big Five personality dimensions and patient gender while accounting for patient and caregiver demographic and health characteristics.
Of a total of 134 patient-caregiver dyads, 19.4% (n = 26) of patients received chemotherapy and 47.8% (n = 64) had an emergency department/inpatient visit in the 30 days before death. Results demonstrated a significant interaction between caregiver openness and patient gender on receipt of chemotherapy (odds ratio = 0.07, p = 0.006). When caregivers were less open, men were more likely to receive chemotherapy near death, whereas when caregivers were more open, women were more likely to receive chemotherapy near death.
Results suggest caregiver personality characteristics, particularly openness, might disrupt gender-based treatment norms at end-of-life. Findings demonstrate that patient and caregiver factors can interact to explain patient healthcare utilization.
性别和个性可能会单独影响临终关怀。男性在临近死亡时往往比女性接受更积极的治疗,而个性——尤其是开放性——在与传统治疗规范存在差异时,可能与增加护理利用有关。然而,研究尚未在对偶情境中检验这些变量的相互作用。
本研究探讨了患者性别和护理人员个性对临终关怀的对偶影响。
本研究使用了 VOICE 随机临床试验的数据,样本包括在萨克拉门托和纽约西部接受门诊治疗的晚期癌症患者-护理人员对偶。分析评估了护理人员的个性是否与患者性别在死亡前 30 天接受化疗或急诊/住院就诊方面存在差异有关。逻辑回归分析了在考虑患者和护理人员的人口统计学和健康特征的情况下,护理人员的大五人格维度与患者性别之间的相互作用。
在总共 134 对患者-护理人员对偶中,26 例(19.4%)患者在死亡前 30 天接受了化疗,64 例(47.8%)患者接受了急诊/住院治疗。结果表明,在接受化疗方面,护理人员的开放性与患者性别之间存在显著的相互作用(比值比=0.07,p=0.006)。当护理人员的开放性较低时,男性更有可能在临近死亡时接受化疗,而当护理人员的开放性较高时,女性更有可能在临近死亡时接受化疗。
结果表明,护理人员的个性特征,特别是开放性,可能会破坏临终关怀中的性别治疗规范。研究结果表明,患者和护理人员的因素可以相互作用,解释患者的医疗保健利用情况。