Herrera Shaynna N, Larsen Emmett M, Deluca Joseph S, Crump Francesca M, Grivel Margaux, Blasco Drew, Bryant Caitlin, Shapiro Daniel I, Downing Donna, Girgis Ragy R, Brucato Gary, Huang Debbie, Kufert Yael, Verdi Mary, West Michelle L, Seidman Larry J, Link Bruce G, McFarlane William R, Woodberry Kristen A, Yang Lawrence H, Corcoran Cheryl M
Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York NY, USA.
Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Stigma Health. 2023 Feb;8(1):31-39. doi: 10.1037/sah0000379. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
Self-stigma has been associated with reduced accuracy of face emotion recognition in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR). Stigma may also relate to slowing of performance during cognitive tasks for which a negative stereotype is relevant. This study aimed to investigate the association of mental illness stigma with face emotion recognition among CHR individuals. Participants were 143 CHR individuals identified using the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS). Face emotion recognition was assessed using the Penn Emotion Recognition Task (ER-40). Stigma was assessed using discrimination, stereotype awareness, and stereotype agreement subscales of the Mental Health Attitudes Interview for CHR. We tested associations of ER-40 accuracy and response times with these stigma variables, including the role of clinical and demographic factors. Racial/ethnic minoritized participants had higher attenuated positive symptoms than non-minoritized participants. Longer ER-40 response times were correlated with greater stereotype agreement (=.17, =.045) and discrimination (=.22, =.012). A regression model predicting ER-40 response times revealed an interaction of stereotype agreement with minoritized status (=.008), with slower response times for minoritized participants as stereotype agreement increased. Greater disorganized symptoms and male gender also predicted longer response times. ER-40 accuracy was not associated with stigma. Overall, minoritized CHR individuals with greater internalized stigma took longer to identify face emotions. Future research is needed to assess whether slower response times are specific to social cues, and if internalized stigma interferes with performance in real-world social situations. Reducing stigma may be an important target for interventions that aim to improve social skills.
自我污名与临床高危精神病个体(CHR)面部情绪识别准确性降低有关。污名也可能与在存在负面刻板印象的认知任务中表现变慢有关。本研究旨在调查CHR个体中精神疾病污名与面部情绪识别之间的关联。参与者为143名使用精神病风险综合征结构化访谈(SIPS)识别出的CHR个体。使用宾夕法尼亚情绪识别任务(ER-40)评估面部情绪识别。使用针对CHR的心理健康态度访谈中的歧视、刻板印象意识和刻板印象认同子量表评估污名。我们测试了ER-40准确性和反应时间与这些污名变量之间的关联,包括临床和人口统计学因素的作用。种族/族裔少数群体参与者的阳性症状缓解程度高于非少数群体参与者。ER-40反应时间越长,与更高的刻板印象认同(r =.17,p =.045)和歧视(r =.22,p =.012)相关。预测ER-40反应时间的回归模型显示,刻板印象认同与少数群体身份之间存在交互作用(p =.008),随着刻板印象认同增加,少数群体参与者的反应时间变慢。更高的紊乱症状和男性性别也预测了更长的反应时间。ER-40准确性与污名无关。总体而言,内化污名程度更高的少数群体CHR个体识别面部情绪所需时间更长。未来需要进行研究,以评估反应时间变慢是否特定于社会线索,以及内化污名是否会干扰现实世界社交情境中的表现。减少污名可能是旨在提高社交技能的干预措施的一个重要目标。