• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Self-stigma and cognitive insight in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis.精神病超高风险个体的自我污名化与认知领悟
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 13;14:1154284. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1154284. eCollection 2023.
2
Empathy and Its Relationship With Social Functioning in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis.同理心及其与超高精神病风险个体社交功能的关系。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 11;12:730092. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.730092. eCollection 2021.
3
Cognitive insight in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis compared to patients with first-episode psychosis and non-psychotic help-seeking youths.与首发精神病患者和非精神病求医者青年相比,超高精神病风险个体的认知洞察力。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2022 Jul;73:103107. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103107. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
4
Stigma of ultra-high risk for psychosis: an updated systematic review.精神病超高风险的污名:更新的系统综述。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2024;46:e20233385. doi: 10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3385. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
5
Impairment of olfactory identification ability in ultra-high risk for psychosis and drug-naïve first episode psychosis.嗅觉识别能力障碍与精神病超高危人群和药物初发的首发精神病。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 13;133:111035. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111035. Epub 2024 May 23.
6
Psychotic conversion of individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis: The potential roles of schizotypy and basic symptoms.精神病超高危个体的精神病性转化:精神分裂症特质和基本症状的潜在作用。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;13(3):546-554. doi: 10.1111/eip.12518. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
7
Salivary cortisol in early psychosis: New findings and meta-analysis.早期精神病中的唾液皮质醇:新发现与荟萃分析。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016 Jan;63:262-70. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
8
State marker properties of niacin skin sensitivity in ultra-high risk groups for psychosis - An optical reflection spectroscopy study.烟酸皮肤敏感性在精神病超高危人群中的状态标志物特性——一项光学反射光谱研究。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Feb;192:377-384. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
9
Cognitive Profile in Ultra High Risk for Psychosis and Schizophrenia: A Comparison Using Coordinated Norms.精神病和精神分裂症超高风险人群的认知特征:使用协调常模的比较
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 1;10:695. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00695. eCollection 2019.
10
Attenuated psychotic and basic symptom characteristics in adolescents with ultra-high risk criteria for psychosis, other non-psychotic psychiatric disorders and early-onset psychosis.有精神病超高风险标准的青少年、其他非精神病性精神障碍及早发性精神病患者的精神病性症状及基本症状特征减弱情况
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;25(10):1091-102. doi: 10.1007/s00787-016-0832-7. Epub 2016 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Stigma of ultra-high risk for psychosis: an updated systematic review.精神病超高风险的污名:更新的系统综述。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2024;46:e20233385. doi: 10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3385. Epub 2024 Jan 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Internalized stigma among people with schizophrenia: Relationship with socio-demographic, clinical and medication-related features.精神分裂症患者的内化污名:与社会人口学、临床和药物相关特征的关系。
Schizophr Res. 2022 May;243:364-371. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.06.007. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
2
Mediation of the stigma in the influence of negative symptomatology over recovery in psychosis.精神病中耻辱感在阴性症状对康复影响中的中介作用。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2021 May-Aug;21(2):100220. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2021.100220. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
3
Self-stigma in Serious Mental Illness: A Systematic Review of Frequency, Correlates, and Consequences.严重精神疾病中的自我污名:频率、相关性和后果的系统综述。
Schizophr Bull. 2021 Aug 21;47(5):1261-1287. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa181.
4
Elucidating the relationship between internalized stigma, cognitive insight, illness severity, and functioning in patients with schizophrenia using a path analysis approach.运用路径分析方法阐明精神分裂症患者的内化污名、认知洞察力、疾病严重程度和功能之间的关系。
J Ment Health. 2022 Feb;31(1):29-38. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1836553. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
5
Cognitive insight in individuals with an at-risk mental state for psychosis: A meta-analysis.处于精神病高危状态个体的认知洞察力:一项荟萃分析。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;15(3):449-456. doi: 10.1111/eip.12993. Epub 2020 May 26.
6
The impact of illness identity on recovery from severe mental illness: A review of the evidence.疾病认同对严重精神疾病康复的影响:证据回顾。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jun;288:112950. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112950. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
7
Should we be concerned about stigma and discrimination in people at risk for psychosis? A systematic review.我们是否应该关注有精神病风险的人群中的污名化和歧视问题?一项系统性综述。
Psychol Med. 2020 Apr;50(5):705-726. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720000148. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
8
Self-help interventions to reduce self-stigma in people with mental health problems: A systematic literature review.自助干预措施减少心理健康问题患者的自我污名化:系统文献综述。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Feb;284:112702. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112702. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
9
Overlap and distinction between measures of insight and self-stigma.洞察和自我污名化测量指标的重叠和区别。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Aug;266:47-64. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.035. Epub 2018 May 26.
10
Metacognitive reflection and insight therapy (MERIT) for patients with schizophrenia.认知反思和洞察疗法(MERIT)治疗精神分裂症患者。
Psychol Med. 2019 Jan;49(2):303-313. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718000855. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

精神病超高风险个体的自我污名化与认知领悟

Self-stigma and cognitive insight in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis.

作者信息

Sportel Bouwina Esther, van Enthoven Mirjam, van Donkersgoed Rozanne J M, Kuis Daan Jan, van de Giessen Tara, Lysaker Paul H, Hasson-Ohayon Ilanit, de Jong Steven, Boonstra Nynke, Pijnenborg Gerdina H M

机构信息

Department of Psychotic Disorders, GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Institute, Assen, Netherlands.

Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 13;14:1154284. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1154284. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1154284
PMID:37124265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10133542/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Impaired cognitive insight and increased self-stigma have been consistently reported in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, but little is known about its presence in individuals at ultra-high risk of developing a psychosis, although self-stigma is associated with transition.to psychosis. The current study examined whether self-stigma is already present in individuals at ultra-high risk of psychosis, and whether this is associated with impaired cognitive insight.

METHODS

184 participants were recruited divided over three groups, namely individuals diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD; n = 92, 34% females), individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR; n = 43, 59% females) and general population controls (GPC; n = 49, 27% females). All participants completed assessments on demographic information (gender, age, education), and cognitive insight. In addition, participants with SSD and individuals at UHR completed a questionnaire on self-stigma.

RESULTS

The level of self-stigma did not differ between individuals at UHR and individuals diagnosed with SSD. Cognitive insight also did not differ significantly between the three groups, but the subscale self-reflection differed between the three groups [(2,184) = 4.20,  = 0.02], with the UHR and SSD groups showing more self-reflection. Pearson's correlation analyses showed that in individuals at UHR total cognitive insight and its self-reflection subscale were significantly associated with the alienation subscale of self-stigma, and in individuals with SSD self-certainty subscale of cognitive insight was significantly associated with stereotype endorsement.

CONCLUSION

Findings show that self-stigma was already present in the UHR phase, to a similar degree as in individuals with a diagnosis of a SSD, and is thus not dependent of previous experience of having a label of SSD. Cognitive insight in individuals at UHR of psychosis appears to be intact, but individuals at UHR showed more self-reflectiveness, and individuals at risk with high cognitive insight also experience high levels of self-stigma. Overall findings from our study suggest that pre-emptive interventions targeting self-stigma, while considering cognitive insight, are needed early on in manifestation of psychotic illness, preferably already in the UHR phase.

摘要

背景

在被诊断为精神分裂症谱系障碍的个体中,认知洞察力受损和自我污名化增加的情况一直有报道,但对于处于精神病超高风险的个体中是否存在这种情况却知之甚少,尽管自我污名化与向精神病的转变有关。本研究调查了自我污名化是否已经存在于处于精神病超高风险的个体中,以及这是否与认知洞察力受损有关。

方法

招募了184名参与者,分为三组,即被诊断为精神分裂症谱系障碍的个体(SSD;n = 92,34%为女性)、处于精神病超高风险的个体(UHR;n = 43,59%为女性)和普通人群对照组(GPC;n = 49,27%为女性)。所有参与者都完成了关于人口统计学信息(性别、年龄、教育程度)和认知洞察力的评估。此外,患有SSD的参与者和处于UHR的个体完成了一份关于自我污名化的问卷。

结果

UHR个体和被诊断为SSD的个体之间的自我污名化水平没有差异。三组之间的认知洞察力也没有显著差异,但三组之间的自我反思子量表存在差异[(2,184) = 4.20, = 0.02],UHR组和SSD组表现出更多的自我反思。Pearson相关分析表明,在UHR个体中,总的认知洞察力及其自我反思子量表与自我污名化的疏离子量表显著相关,而在患有SSD的个体中,认知洞察力的自我确定性子量表与刻板印象认同显著相关。

结论

研究结果表明,自我污名化在UHR阶段就已经存在,程度与被诊断为SSD的个体相似,因此不依赖于先前有SSD标签的经历。处于精神病UHR阶段的个体的认知洞察力似乎是完整的,但UHR个体表现出更多的自我反思,并且认知洞察力高的风险个体也经历高水平的自我污名化。我们研究的总体结果表明,在精神病性疾病表现的早期阶段,最好在UHR阶段就需要针对自我污名化并考虑认知洞察力的预防性干预措施。