Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science & Technology, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK.
School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Nov;77(11):2354-2363. doi: 10.1177/17470218241231283. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
There is a growing body of evidence that higher-value information can be prioritised for both visual and auditory working memory. The present study examines whether valuable items can similarly be prioritised for the tactile domain. Employing an immediate serial recall procedure (ISR), participants reconstructed a 6-item tactile sequence by moving their fingers in the order of original stimulation. Participants were informed either that one serial position was worth notionally more points (prioritisation condition) or that all items were of equal value (control condition). For Experiment 1 ( = 48), significant boosts in correct recall were evident when serial positions 4 or 5 were more valuable (i.e., prioritisation effects). Experiment 2 ( = 24) demonstrated that the prioritisation effect persisted with concurrent articulation, suggesting that task performance was not a function of verbal recoding and rehearsal of the tactile information. Importantly, a significant recall cost for low-value (non-prioritised) items within the sequence was evident for both experiments. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that (1) prioritisation effects transfer to the tactile domain and (2) finite attentional resources can be deliberately and strategically redistributed to specific items within a sequence, dependent upon the prevailing task demands.
越来越多的证据表明,更高价值的信息可以优先用于视觉和听觉工作记忆。本研究考察了有价值的物品是否也可以优先用于触觉领域。采用即时序列回忆程序(ISR),参与者通过按照原始刺激的顺序移动手指来重建 6 项触觉序列。参与者被告知一个序列位置在理论上更有价值(优先条件)或所有项目都具有相同的价值(对照条件)。对于实验 1(n=48),当序列位置 4 或 5 更有价值时,正确回忆的显著提升是显而易见的(即优先化效应)。实验 2(n=24)表明,在进行并发发音的情况下,优先化效应仍然存在,这表明任务表现不是触觉信息的口头重新编码和复述的函数。重要的是,对于两个实验,序列中低价值(非优先化)项目的显著回忆成本是明显的。总之,这些发现表明:(1)优先化效应可以转移到触觉领域;(2)有限的注意力资源可以根据当前的任务需求,有目的地和策略性地重新分配给序列中的特定项目。