Discipline of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University and Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford ParkAdelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Flinders Medical Centre, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia.
Clin Exp Med. 2024 Jan 29;24(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s10238-024-01294-3.
The identification of novel, easily measurable biomarkers of inflammation might enhance the diagnosis and management of immunological diseases (IDs). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate an emerging biomarker derived from the full blood count, the systemic inflammation index (SII), in patients with IDs and healthy controls. We searched Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science from inception to 12 December 2023 for relevant articles and evaluated the risk of bias and the certainty of evidence using the Joanna Briggs Checklist and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Working Group system, respectively. In 16 eligible studies, patients with IDs had a significantly higher SII when compared to controls (standard mean difference, SMD = 1.08, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.41, p < 0.001; I = 96.2%, p < 0.001; moderate certainty of evidence). The pooled area under the curve (AUC) for diagnostic accuracy was 0.85 (95% CI 0.82-0.88). In subgroup analysis, the effect size was significant across different types of ID, barring systemic lupus erythematosus (p = 0.20). In further analyses, the SII was significantly higher in ID patients with active disease vs. those in remission (SMD = 0.81, 95% CI 0.34-1.27, p < 0.001; I = 93.6%, p < 0.001; moderate certainty of evidence). The pooled AUC was 0.74 (95% CI 0.70-0.78). Our study suggests that the SII can effectively discriminate between subjects with and without IDs and between ID patients with and without active disease. Prospective studies are warranted to determine whether the SII can enhance the diagnosis of IDs in routine practice. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023493142).
新型、易于测量的炎症生物标志物的鉴定可能会增强免疫性疾病 (IDs) 的诊断和管理。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以研究源自全血细胞计数的新兴生物标志物——全身炎症指数 (SII) 在 IDs 患者和健康对照者中的应用。我们从建库至 2023 年 12 月 12 日在 Scopus、PubMed 和 Web of Science 上检索相关文章,并分别使用 Joanna Briggs 清单和推荐、评估、开发和评估工作组系统 (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Working Group system) 评估偏倚风险和证据质量。在 16 项符合条件的研究中,与对照组相比,IDs 患者的 SII 显著升高(标准均数差,SMD=1.08,95%CI 0.75 至 1.41,p<0.001;I=96.2%,p<0.001;证据质量为中等级别)。诊断准确性的曲线下面积(AUC)汇总值为 0.85(95%CI 0.82-0.88)。在亚组分析中,除系统性红斑狼疮外(p=0.20),不同类型 IDs 之间的效应大小均有统计学意义。进一步分析显示,活动期 ID 患者的 SII 明显高于缓解期患者(SMD=0.81,95%CI 0.34-1.27,p<0.001;I=93.6%,p<0.001;证据质量为中等级别)。汇总 AUC 为 0.74(95%CI 0.70-0.78)。本研究表明,SII 可有效区分 IDs 患者和非 IDs 患者,以及 ID 患者的活动期和缓解期。需要前瞻性研究来确定 SII 是否可以提高 IDs 常规临床实践中的诊断能力。(PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42023493142)。