Suppr超能文献

探讨全科医生在非癌性疼痛治疗中减少阿片类药物使用的促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。

Exploring the facilitators and barriers in opioid deprescribing for non-cancer pain treatment experienced by general practitioners: A qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Pain. 2024 Aug;28(7):1101-1115. doi: 10.1002/ejp.2243. Epub 2024 Jan 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend opioid deprescribing in patients on long-term opioid treatment for chronic non-cancer pain. This study aims to explore facilitators and barriers in opioid deprescribing among general practitioners in the Netherlands. In addition, this study aims to identify possibilities for improvement regarding opioid deprescribing in primary care.

METHODS

Focus group discussions with Dutch General practitioners were held by two skilled moderators. The focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim and analysed using MAXQDA software. Three independent reviewers searched for overarching themes using thematic analysis with an inductive approach. Discussions were organized until data saturation was reached.

RESULTS

Twenty-two general practitioners participated in four focus group discussions. Five main themes emerged from the data: (1) patient-centred care; (2) ensuring proper pain management (3) dilemmas and hardships in dealing with opioid use disorder; (4) the competency gap; (5) needs and possibilities to improve opioid deprescribing in primary care. The first theme addresses the main facilitators in opioid tapering. The following three themes emerged as main barriers in opioid deprescribing. The fifth theme identified possibilities for change.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates the importance of intrinsic motivation and a tailored approach to deprescribe opioids in patients with chronic pain on long-term opioid treatment. Identified barriers include struggles in pain management, challenges caused by opioid use disorder, insufficient capacities such as time constraints and lack of skills. Recommendations for improvement involve enhanced collaboration with healthcare professionals in primary and secondary care, provision of practical tools and assurance of sufficient time.

SIGNIFICANCE

This focus group study among 22 Dutch general practitioners elucidates the complexities of opioid deprescribing and reveals pivotal themes such as patient-centred care, pain management challenges, and competency gaps. The findings underscore the crucial role of intrinsic motivation and that of a tailored approach in opioid deprescribing, while demonstrating how a lack in effective pain treatments, practical capacities and challenges caused by opioid dependence, impede opioid deprescribing. By uncovering these complexities, this study aims to inform future deprescribing strategies.

摘要

背景

指南建议对长期接受阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌痛的患者进行阿片类药物减量。本研究旨在探索荷兰全科医生在阿片类药物减量方面的促进因素和障碍。此外,本研究旨在确定初级保健中阿片类药物减量的改进可能性。

方法

由两位熟练的主持人对荷兰全科医生进行了焦点小组讨论。焦点小组讨论的文字记录被逐字转录,并使用 MAXQDA 软件进行分析。三位独立的评论员使用主题分析和归纳法寻找总体主题。讨论组织到数据饱和为止。

结果

22 名全科医生参加了 4 次焦点小组讨论。从数据中出现了 5 个主要主题:(1)以患者为中心的护理;(2)确保适当的疼痛管理;(3)在处理阿片类药物使用障碍时的困境和困难;(4)能力差距;(5)改善初级保健中阿片类药物减量的需求和可能性。第一个主题涉及阿片类药物逐渐减少的主要促进因素。以下三个主题是阿片类药物减量的主要障碍。第五个主题确定了变革的可能性。

结论

本研究表明,对长期接受阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的患者进行阿片类药物减量时,内在动机和量身定制的方法非常重要。确定的障碍包括疼痛管理方面的困难、阿片类药物使用障碍引起的挑战、时间限制和技能不足等能力限制。改进建议包括加强与初级和二级保健医疗保健专业人员的合作、提供实用工具和确保有足够的时间。

意义

这项针对 22 名荷兰全科医生的焦点小组研究阐明了阿片类药物减量的复杂性,并揭示了一些关键主题,如以患者为中心的护理、疼痛管理挑战和能力差距。研究结果强调了内在动机和量身定制方法在阿片类药物减量中的重要性,同时也表明缺乏有效的疼痛治疗、实用能力和阿片类药物依赖引起的挑战,阻碍了阿片类药物减量。通过揭示这些复杂性,本研究旨在为未来的减量策略提供信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验