Suppr超能文献

追踪自己?通过技术实现自我认知的价值与伦理。

Track Thyself? The Value and Ethics of Self-knowledge Through Technology.

作者信息

Leuenberger Muriel

机构信息

Center for Ethics, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 117, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Philos Technol. 2024;37(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s13347-024-00704-4. Epub 2024 Jan 27.

Abstract

Novel technological devices, applications, and algorithms can provide us with a vast amount of personal information about ourselves. Given that we have ethical and practical reasons to pursue self-knowledge, should we use technology to increase our self-knowledge? And which ethical issues arise from the pursuit of technologically sourced self-knowledge? In this paper, I explore these questions in relation to bioinformation technologies (health and activity trackers, DTC genetic testing, and DTC neurotechnologies) and algorithmic profiling used for recommender systems, targeted advertising, and technologically supported decision-making. First, I distinguish between impersonal, critical, and relational self-knowledge. Relational self-knowledge is a so far neglected dimension of self-knowledge which is introduced in this paper. Next, I investigate the contribution of these technologies to the three types of self-knowledge and uncover the connected ethical concerns. Technology can provide a lot of impersonal self-knowledge, but we should focus on the quality of the information which tends to be particularly insufficient for marginalized groups. In terms of critical self-knowledge, the nature of technologically sourced personal information typically impedes critical engagement. The value of relational self-knowledge speaks in favour of transparency of information technology, notably for algorithms that are involved in decision-making about individuals. Moreover, bioinformation technologies and digital profiling shape the concepts and norms that define us. We should ensure they not only serve commercial interests but our identity and self-knowledge interests.

摘要

新型技术设备、应用程序和算法能够为我们提供大量关于自身的个人信息。鉴于我们有道德和实际的理由去追求自我认知,我们是否应该利用技术来增进自我认知呢?而追求通过技术获取的自我认知又会引发哪些伦理问题呢?在本文中,我将围绕生物信息技术(健康与活动追踪器、直接面向消费者的基因检测以及直接面向消费者的神经技术)以及用于推荐系统、定向广告和技术支持决策的算法剖析来探讨这些问题。首先,我区分了客观的、批判性的和关系性的自我认知。关系性自我认知是本文引入的一个迄今被忽视的自我认知维度。接下来,我研究这些技术对这三种自我认知类型的贡献,并揭示相关的伦理问题。技术能够提供大量客观的自我认知,但我们应关注信息的质量,而这对边缘化群体来说往往尤为不足。就批判性自我认知而言,通过技术获取的个人信息的性质通常会阻碍批判性参与。关系性自我认知的价值表明信息技术应保持透明,特别是对于涉及个人决策的算法。此外,生物信息技术和数字剖析塑造了定义我们的概念和规范。我们应确保它们不仅服务于商业利益,还要服务于我们的身份和自我认知利益。

相似文献

1
Track Thyself? The Value and Ethics of Self-knowledge Through Technology.
Philos Technol. 2024;37(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s13347-024-00704-4. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
2
Defining Ourselves: Personal Bioinformation as a Tool of Narrative Self-Conception.
J Bioeth Inq. 2016 Mar;13(1):133-51. doi: 10.1007/s11673-015-9690-0. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
3
Recommender systems for mental health apps: advantages and ethical challenges.
AI Soc. 2022 Jan 17:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00146-021-01322-w.
4
Ethics in the History of Medical Informatics for Decision-Making: Early Challenges to Digital Health Goals.
Yearb Med Inform. 2022 Aug;31(1):317-322. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742491. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.
8
Person-Centered Care From a Relational Ethics Perspective for the Delivery of High Quality and Safe Healthcare: A Scoping Review.
Front Public Health. 2020 Mar 6;8:44. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00044. eCollection 2020.
9
Big tech and societal sustainability: an ethical framework.
AI Soc. 2020;35(4):829-840. doi: 10.1007/s00146-020-00956-6. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
10
Diffusion of the Digital Health Self-Tracking Movement in Canada: Results of a National Survey.
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 2;20(5):e177. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9388.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical, legal, and social considerations of AI-based medical decision-support tools: A scoping review.
Int J Med Inform. 2022 May;161:104738. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104738. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
2
In Defense of Narrative Authenticity.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2020 Oct;29(4):656-667. doi: 10.1017/S0963180120000407.
3
Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnology: What Is It and What Is It for?
AJOB Neurosci. 2019 Oct-Dec;10(4):149-151. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2019.1668493.
4
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
BMJ. 2019 Oct 16;367:l5688. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5688.
5
Toward clinical digital phenotyping: a timely opportunity to consider purpose, quality, and safety.
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Sep 6;2:88. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0166-1. eCollection 2019.
6
Oversight of direct-to-consumer neurotechnologies.
Science. 2019 Jan 18;363(6424):234-235. doi: 10.1126/science.aav0223.
7
Nothing personal: algorithmic individuation on music streaming platforms.
Media Cult Soc. 2018 Oct;40(7):1086-1100. doi: 10.1177/0163443717745147. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
8
Genetic Test Availability And Spending: Where Are We Now? Where Are We Going?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 May;37(5):710-716. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1427.
9
The making of autobiographical memory: intersections of culture, narratives and identity.
Int J Psychol. 2011 Oct;46(5):321-45. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2011.596541.
10
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验