Suppr超能文献

在精子处理过程中,上游法在保存精子DNA完整性方面优于密度梯度离心法。

Swim-up method is superior to density gradient centrifugation for preserving sperm DNA integrity during sperm processing.

作者信息

Amano Kenji, Oigawa Satoko, Ichizawa Koichiro, Tokuda Yukiko, Unagami Mami, Sekiguchi Mami, Furui Mayuko, Nakaoka Kentaro, Ito Ayumu, Hayashi Rika, Tamaki Yuko, Hayashi Yuko, Fukuda Yusuke, Katagiri Yukiko, Nakata Masahiko, Nagao Koichi

机构信息

Reproduction Center, Toho University Omori Medical Center Tokyo Japan.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Toho University Tokyo Japan.

出版信息

Reprod Med Biol. 2024 Jan 29;23(1):e12562. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12562. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of swim-up and density gradient centrifugation methods on sperm DNA fragmentation.

METHODS

Nineteen normozoospermic patient samples with ≥100 × 10 motile sperms were included in this study. Sperm DNA fragmentation, progressive motility, and progressive motile sperm number were measured before and after the swim-up method or density gradient centrifugation.

RESULTS

Sperm DNA fragmentation was not statistically different between swim-up-(14.4 ± 2.1%,  = 0.32) and density gradient centrifugation-processed (25.0 ± 3.0%,  = 0.20) and unprocessed semen samples (19.2 ± 1.9%). Sperm DNA fragmentation was significantly lower in swim-up-than in density gradient centrifugation-processed samples ( < 0.05). Sperm progressive motility was significantly higher ( < 0.05) in swim-up-(92.9 ± 1.0%) and density gradient centrifugation-processed (81.3 ± 2.0%) samples, with the former being higher, than in unprocessed semen samples (53.1 ± 3.7%). The recovery rate of progressive motile sperms was significantly lower in swim-up-(9.7 ± 1.4%) than in density gradient centrifugation-processed samples (17.2 ± 1.8%,  < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The swim-up method is superior to density gradient centrifugation, evidenced by less sperm DNA fragmentation and higher sperm progressive motility. The recovery rate of progressive motile sperms was better after density gradient centrifugation than after swim-up.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估上游法和密度梯度离心法对精子DNA片段化的影响。

方法

本研究纳入了19例正常精子症患者样本,其活动精子数≥100×10。在采用上游法或密度梯度离心法处理前后,测量精子DNA片段化、前向运动能力和前向运动精子数量。

结果

上游法处理的样本(14.4±2.1%,P = 0.32)、密度梯度离心法处理的样本(25.0±3.0%,P = 0.20)与未处理的精液样本(19.2±1.9%)之间,精子DNA片段化无统计学差异。上游法处理的样本中精子DNA片段化显著低于密度梯度离心法处理的样本(P<0.05)。上游法处理的样本(92.9±1.0%)和密度梯度离心法处理的样本(81.3±2.0%)的精子前向运动能力显著高于未处理的精液样本(53.1±3.7%),且前者更高(P<0.05)。上游法处理的样本中前向运动精子的回收率(9.7±1.4%)显著低于密度梯度离心法处理的样本(17.2±1.8%,P<0.05)。

结论

上游法优于密度梯度离心法,表现为精子DNA片段化更少且精子前向运动能力更高。密度梯度离心后前向运动精子的回收率比上游法更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7618/10823384/e3e1d31cd657/RMB2-23-e12562-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验