Amano Kenji, Oigawa Satoko, Ichizawa Koichiro, Tokuda Yukiko, Unagami Mami, Sekiguchi Mami, Furui Mayuko, Nakaoka Kentaro, Ito Ayumu, Hayashi Rika, Tamaki Yuko, Hayashi Yuko, Fukuda Yusuke, Katagiri Yukiko, Nakata Masahiko, Nagao Koichi
Reproduction Center, Toho University Omori Medical Center Tokyo Japan.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Toho University Tokyo Japan.
Reprod Med Biol. 2024 Jan 29;23(1):e12562. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12562. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of swim-up and density gradient centrifugation methods on sperm DNA fragmentation.
Nineteen normozoospermic patient samples with ≥100 × 10 motile sperms were included in this study. Sperm DNA fragmentation, progressive motility, and progressive motile sperm number were measured before and after the swim-up method or density gradient centrifugation.
Sperm DNA fragmentation was not statistically different between swim-up-(14.4 ± 2.1%, = 0.32) and density gradient centrifugation-processed (25.0 ± 3.0%, = 0.20) and unprocessed semen samples (19.2 ± 1.9%). Sperm DNA fragmentation was significantly lower in swim-up-than in density gradient centrifugation-processed samples ( < 0.05). Sperm progressive motility was significantly higher ( < 0.05) in swim-up-(92.9 ± 1.0%) and density gradient centrifugation-processed (81.3 ± 2.0%) samples, with the former being higher, than in unprocessed semen samples (53.1 ± 3.7%). The recovery rate of progressive motile sperms was significantly lower in swim-up-(9.7 ± 1.4%) than in density gradient centrifugation-processed samples (17.2 ± 1.8%, < 0.05).
The swim-up method is superior to density gradient centrifugation, evidenced by less sperm DNA fragmentation and higher sperm progressive motility. The recovery rate of progressive motile sperms was better after density gradient centrifugation than after swim-up.
本研究旨在评估上游法和密度梯度离心法对精子DNA片段化的影响。
本研究纳入了19例正常精子症患者样本,其活动精子数≥100×10。在采用上游法或密度梯度离心法处理前后,测量精子DNA片段化、前向运动能力和前向运动精子数量。
上游法处理的样本(14.4±2.1%,P = 0.32)、密度梯度离心法处理的样本(25.0±3.0%,P = 0.20)与未处理的精液样本(19.2±1.9%)之间,精子DNA片段化无统计学差异。上游法处理的样本中精子DNA片段化显著低于密度梯度离心法处理的样本(P<0.05)。上游法处理的样本(92.9±1.0%)和密度梯度离心法处理的样本(81.3±2.0%)的精子前向运动能力显著高于未处理的精液样本(53.1±3.7%),且前者更高(P<0.05)。上游法处理的样本中前向运动精子的回收率(9.7±1.4%)显著低于密度梯度离心法处理的样本(17.2±1.8%,P<0.05)。
上游法优于密度梯度离心法,表现为精子DNA片段化更少且精子前向运动能力更高。密度梯度离心后前向运动精子的回收率比上游法更好。