Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Denver Health & Hospital Association, Denver, CO, USA.
Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Med Decis Making. 2024 Nov;44(8):867-879. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241266246. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
Decision making for adult tracheostomy and prolonged mechanical ventilation is emotionally complex. Expectations of surrogate decision makers and physicians rarely align. Little is known about what surrogates need to make goal-concordant decisions. Currently, little is known about the decisional needs of surrogates and providers, impeding efforts to improve the decision-making process.
Using a thematic analysis approach, we performed a qualitative study with semistructured interviews with surrogates of adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) being considered for tracheostomy and physicians routinely caring for patients receiving MV. Recruitment was stopped when thematic saturation was reached. We describe the decision-making process, identify core decisional needs, and map the process and needs for possible elements of a future shared decision-making tool.
Forty-three participants (23 surrogates and 20 physicians) completed interviews. Hope, Lack of Knowledge Data, and Uncertainty emerged as the 3 main themes that described the decision-making process and were interconnected with one another and, at times, opposed each other. Core decisional needs included information about patient wishes, past activity/medical history, short- and long-term outcomes, and meaningful recovery. The themes were the lens through which the decisional needs were weighed. Decision making existed as a balance between surrogate emotions and understanding and physician recommendations.
Tracheostomy and prolonged MV decision making is complex. Hope and Uncertainty were conceptual themes that often battled with one another. Lack of Knowledge & Data plagued both surrogates and physicians. Multiple tangible factors were identified that affected surrogate decision making and physician recommendations.
Understanding this complex decision-making process has the potential to improve the information provided to surrogates and, potentially, increase the goal-concordant care and alignment of surrogate and physician expectations.
Decision making for tracheostomy and prolonged mechanical ventilation is a complex interactive process between surrogate decision makers and providers.Qualitative themes of Hope, Uncertainty, and Lack of Knowledge & Data shared by both providers and surrogates were identified and described the decision-making process.Concrete decisional needs of patient wishes, past activity/medical history, short- and long-term outcomes, and meaningful recovery affected each of the larger themes and represented key information from which surrogates and providers based decisions and recommendations.The qualitative themes and decisional needs identified provide a roadmap to design a shared decision-making intervention to improve adult tracheostomy and prolonged mechanical ventilation decision making.
成人气管切开术和长时间机械通气的决策过程充满情感复杂性。代理人和医生的期望很少一致。对于代理人做出与目标一致的决策所需的条件知之甚少。目前,对于代理人和提供者的决策需求知之甚少,这阻碍了改善决策过程的努力。
我们采用主题分析方法,对接受机械通气(MV)治疗并考虑进行气管切开术的成年患者的代理人和常规照顾接受 MV 治疗患者的医生进行了半结构式访谈的定性研究。当达到主题饱和时,停止招募。我们描述了决策过程,确定了核心决策需求,并为未来可能的共享决策工具要素绘制了流程和需求图。
43 名参与者(23 名代理人和 20 名医生)完成了访谈。希望、缺乏知识和数据以及不确定性是描述决策过程的 3 个主要主题,它们相互关联,有时相互矛盾。核心决策需求包括患者意愿、既往活动/医疗史、短期和长期结果以及有意义的康复方面的信息。这些主题是权衡决策需求的视角。决策制定是代理人的情感和理解与医生建议之间的平衡。
气管切开术和长时间 MV 决策非常复杂。希望和不确定性是经常相互冲突的概念性主题。缺乏知识和数据困扰着代理人和医生。确定了多个有形因素,这些因素影响了代理人的决策制定和医生的建议。
了解这一复杂的决策过程有可能改善向代理人提供的信息,并有可能增加目标一致的护理和代理人与医生期望的一致性。
气管切开术和长时间机械通气的决策是代理人和提供者之间复杂的互动过程。确定并描述了双方共同存在的希望、不确定性和缺乏知识与数据的定性主题。患者意愿、既往活动/医疗史、短期和长期结果以及有意义的康复等具体决策需求影响了每个更大的主题,并代表了代理人和提供者做出决策和建议的关键信息。确定的定性主题和决策需求为设计改善成人气管切开术和长时间机械通气决策的共享决策干预措施提供了路线图。