Department of Infrastructure Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Water Res. 2024 Mar 15;252:121202. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121202. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
Hydrodynamic models can accurately simulate flood inundation but are limited by their high computational demand that scales non-linearly with model complexity, resolution, and domain size. Therefore, it is often not feasible to use high-resolution hydrodynamic models for real-time flood predictions or when a large number of predictions are needed for probabilistic flood design. Computationally efficient surrogate models have been developed to address this issue. The recently developed Low-fidelity, Spatial analysis, and Gaussian Process Learning (LSG) model has shown strong performance in both computational efficiency and simulation accuracy. The LSG model is a physics-guided surrogate model that simulates flood inundation by first using an extremely coarse and simplified (i.e. low-fidelity) hydrodynamic model to provide an initial estimate of flood inundation. Then, the low-fidelity estimate is upskilled via Empirical Orthogonal Functions (EOF) analysis and Sparse Gaussian Process models to provide accurate high-resolution predictions. Despite the promising results achieved thus far, the LSG model has not been benchmarked against other surrogate models. Such a comparison is needed to fully understand the value of the LSG model and to provide guidance for future research efforts in flood inundation simulation. This study compares the LSG model to four state-of-the-art surrogate flood inundation models. The surrogate models are assessed for their ability to simulate the temporal and spatial evolution of flood inundation for events both within and beyond the range used for model training. The models are evaluated for three distinct case studies in Australia and the United Kingdom. The LSG model is found to be superior in accuracy for both flood extent and water depth, including when applied to flood events outside the range of training data used, while achieving high computational efficiency. In addition, the low-fidelity model is found to play a crucial role in achieving the overall superior performance of the LSG model.
水动力模型可以精确地模拟洪水淹没情况,但由于其计算需求高,与模型复杂度、分辨率和域大小呈非线性比例关系,因此通常无法在实时洪水预测或需要大量预测进行概率洪水设计时使用高分辨率水动力模型。已经开发了计算效率高的替代模型来解决这个问题。最近开发的低精度、空间分析和高斯过程学习(LSG)模型在计算效率和模拟精度方面都表现出了很强的性能。LSG 模型是一种物理指导的替代模型,通过首先使用非常粗糙和简化的(即低精度)水动力模型来提供洪水淹没的初始估计,从而模拟洪水淹没。然后,通过经验正交函数(EOF)分析和稀疏高斯过程模型对低精度估计进行技能提升,以提供准确的高分辨率预测。尽管迄今为止取得了很有希望的结果,但 LSG 模型尚未与其他替代模型进行基准测试。这种比较对于充分了解 LSG 模型的价值以及为洪水淹没模拟的未来研究工作提供指导是必要的。本研究将 LSG 模型与四种最先进的替代洪水淹没模型进行了比较。评估了替代模型模拟洪水淹没的时空演变的能力,包括事件在模型训练范围内和范围外的能力。对澳大利亚和英国的三个不同案例研究进行了评估。发现 LSG 模型在洪水范围和水深的准确性方面都优于其他模型,包括在应用于训练数据范围之外的洪水事件时,同时实现了高计算效率。此外,还发现低精度模型在实现 LSG 模型的整体卓越性能方面发挥了关键作用。