Kampa Raj Kishor, Padhan Dhirendra Kumar, Karna Nalini, Gouda Jayaram
Department of Library & Information Science, Berhampur University, Berhampur, India.
Library, School of Planning and Architecture, Bhopal, India.
Account Res. 2025 Feb;32(2):83-98. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2311212. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
The present study explores the major reasons for committing plagiarism, as reported in published literature. One hundred sixty-six peer-reviewed articles, which were retrieved from the Scopus database, were carefully examined to find out the research studies conducted to explore the most common reasons for academic cheating among students and researchers in different disciplines in higher education. An analysis of collected literature reveals that 19 studies were conducted to identify the perceived reasons of committing plagiarism. Four studies with similar constructs of perceived reasons of committing plagiarism, namely busy schedule, overload of homework and laziness, easy accessibility of electronic resources, poor knowledge in research writing and correct citation and lack of serious penalty, were conducted. The pooled mean and standard deviation of the four studies reveal that easy accessibility of electronic resources (Mean = 3.6, SD = 0.81), unawareness of instructions (Mean = 3.0, SD = 0.89), and busy schedule, overload of homework and laziness (Mean = 2.89, SD = 1.0) are important perceived reasons for committing plagiarism. The study findings could help create an effective intervention and a robust anti-plagiarism policy for academic institutions, administrators, and policymakers in detecting academic dishonesty while emphasizing the value of integrity in academic pursuit.
本研究探讨了已发表文献中所报道的抄袭行为的主要原因。从Scopus数据库中检索出166篇经过同行评审的文章,并对其进行仔细审查,以找出为探究高等教育不同学科中学生和研究人员学术作弊最常见原因而开展的研究。对所收集文献的分析表明,有19项研究旨在确定被认为导致抄袭行为的原因。有四项研究针对导致抄袭行为的类似认知原因展开,即日程繁忙、作业负担过重和懒惰、电子资源易于获取、研究写作和正确引用方面知识匮乏以及缺乏严厉惩罚。这四项研究的合并均值和标准差表明,电子资源易于获取(均值 = 3.6,标准差 = 0.81)、不了解相关规定(均值 = 3.0,标准差 = 0.89)以及日程繁忙、作业负担过重和懒惰(均值 = 2.89,标准差 = 1.0)是被认为导致抄袭行为的重要原因。研究结果有助于为学术机构、管理人员和政策制定者制定有效的干预措施和强有力的反抄袭政策,以在强调学术追求中诚信价值的同时,检测学术不端行为。