• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对LI-RADS CT v2018进行系统培训可提高肝脏局灶性病变LR分类中观察者间的一致性和表现。

Systematic training of LI-RADS CT v2018 improves interobserver agreements and performances in LR categorization for focal liver lesions.

作者信息

Ba Te, Xu Hui, Yang Da-Wei, Wang Zhen-Chang, Yang Zhenghan, Ren A-Hong

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 YongAn Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China.

Department of Radiology, The First Hospital of Beijing Fangshan District, 6 Fangyao Road Chengguan, Fangshan District, Beijing, 102600, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Jpn J Radiol. 2024 May;42(5):476-486. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01523-x. Epub 2024 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1007/s11604-023-01523-x
PMID:38291269
Abstract

AIM

To retrospectively explored whether systematic training in the use of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 on computed tomography (CT) can improve the interobserver agreements and performances in LR categorization for focal liver lesions (FLLs) among different radiologists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 18 visiting radiologists and the liver multiphase CT images of 70 hepatic observations in 63 patients at high risk of HCC were included in this study. The LI-RADS v2018 training procedure included three thematic lectures, with an interval of 1 month. After each seminar, the radiologists had 1 month to adopt the algorithm into their daily work. The interobserver agreements and performances in LR categorization for FLLs among the radiologists before and after training were compared.

RESULTS

After training, the interobserver agreements in classifying the LR categories for all radiologists were significantly increased for most LR categories (P < 0.001), except for LR-1 (P = 0.053). After systematic training, the areas under the curve (AUCs) for LR categorization performance for all participants were significantly increased for most LR categories (P < 0.001), except for LR-1 (P = 0.062).

CONCLUSION

Systematic training in the use of the LI-RADS can improve the interobserver agreements and performances in LR categorization for FLLs among radiologists with different levels of experience.

摘要

目的

回顾性探讨针对计算机断层扫描(CT)使用肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)v2018进行系统培训是否能改善不同放射科医生对肝脏局灶性病变(FLLs)进行LR分类时的观察者间一致性和表现。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了18名来访的放射科医生以及63例肝癌高危患者的70次肝脏多期CT图像。LI-RADS v2018培训程序包括三场专题讲座,间隔为1个月。每次讲座后,放射科医生有1个月时间将该算法应用于日常工作。比较了培训前后放射科医生对FLLs进行LR分类时的观察者间一致性和表现。

结果

培训后,除LR-1(P = 0.053)外,大多数LR分类中所有放射科医生对LR类别的观察者间一致性显著提高(P < 0.001)。系统培训后,除LR-1(P = 0.062)外,大多数LR分类中所有参与者的LR分类表现的曲线下面积(AUCs)显著增加(P < 0.001)。

结论

对LI-RADS使用进行系统培训可改善不同经验水平放射科医生对FLLs进行LR分类时的观察者间一致性和表现。

相似文献

1
Systematic training of LI-RADS CT v2018 improves interobserver agreements and performances in LR categorization for focal liver lesions.对LI-RADS CT v2018进行系统培训可提高肝脏局灶性病变LR分类中观察者间的一致性和表现。
Jpn J Radiol. 2024 May;42(5):476-486. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01523-x. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
2
Systematic Training of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging v2018 can Improve the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma for Different Radiologists.2018版肝脏影像报告和数据系统磁共振成像的系统培训可提高不同放射科医生对肝细胞癌的诊断水平。
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2021 Aug 28;9(4):537-544. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2021.00180. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
3
Diagnostic performance of MR for hepatocellular carcinoma based on LI-RADS v2018, compared with v2017.基于 LI-RADS v2018 的肝细胞癌的 MRI 诊断性能,与 v2017 相比。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Sep;50(3):746-755. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26640. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
4
Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018: Impact on Categorization and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staging.肝脏影像报告和数据系统 2018 年版:对分类和肝细胞癌分期的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2019 Oct;25(10):1488-1502. doi: 10.1002/lt.25614. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
5
Hepatic Steatosis Has No Effect in Diagnosis Accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 Categorization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in MR Imaging.肝脂肪变对 MRI 诊断 LI-RADS v2018 肝细胞癌分类的准确率没有影响。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Jun;59(6):2060-2070. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27783. Epub 2021 Jun 13.
6
Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.LI-RADS 版本 2018、LI-RADS 版本 2017 和 OPTN 标准用于诊断肝细胞癌的性能比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Nov;215(5):1085-1092. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.22772. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
7
Automated CT LI-RADS v2018 scoring of liver observations using machine learning: A multivendor, multicentre retrospective study.使用机器学习对肝脏影像进行自动CT LI-RADS v2018评分:一项多厂商、多中心回顾性研究。
JHEP Rep. 2023 Jul 22;5(10):100857. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100857. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
Differences between CEUS LI-RADS and CECT LI-RADS in the diagnosis of focal liver lesions in patients at risk for HCC.CEUS LI-RADS 与 CECT LI-RADS 在 HCC 高危患者局灶性肝脏病变诊断中的差异。
BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Sep 11;23(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-01088-1.
9
Does quantitative assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout improve LI-RADS v2018-based classification of liver lesions?动脉期增强程度和廓清率的定量评估是否能提高基于 LI-RADS v2018 的肝脏病变分类?
Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2922-2933. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06596-9. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
10
Longitudinal evolution of CT and MRI LI-RADS v2014 category 1, 2, 3, and 4 observations.LI-RADS v2014 分类 1、2、3 和 4 观察的 CT 和 MRI 的 LI-RADS 纵向演变。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep;29(9):5073-5081. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06058-2. Epub 2019 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in the United Kingdom: challenges and solutions.改善英国肝细胞癌监测:挑战与解决方案
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Jun 15;43:100963. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100963. eCollection 2024 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
LI-RADS: Looking Back, Looking Forward.LI-RADS:回顾与展望。
Radiology. 2023 Apr;307(1):e222801. doi: 10.1148/radiol.222801. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
2
Global Epidemiology and Genetics of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.全球肝细胞癌的流行病学和遗传学
Gastroenterology. 2023 Apr;164(5):766-782. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.01.033. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
3
LI-RADS Tumor in Vein at CT and Hepatobiliary MRI.CT 和肝胆 MRI 中的 LI-RADS 肿瘤在静脉内。
Radiology. 2022 Jan;302(1):107-115. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021210215. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
4
Systematic Training of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging v2018 can Improve the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma for Different Radiologists.2018版肝脏影像报告和数据系统磁共振成像的系统培训可提高不同放射科医生对肝细胞癌的诊断水平。
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2021 Aug 28;9(4):537-544. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2021.00180. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
5
Disease Burden, Risk Factors, and Recent Trends of Liver Cancer: A Global Country-Level Analysis.肝癌的疾病负担、风险因素及近期趋势:一项全球国家层面分析
Liver Cancer. 2021 Jul;10(4):330-345. doi: 10.1159/000515304. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
6
Does Training in LI-RADS Version 2018 Improve Readers' Agreement with the Expert Consensus and Inter-reader Agreement in MRI Interpretation?LI-RADS 版本 2018 培训是否能提高读者对专家共识和 MRI 解读中读者间一致性的认同?
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Dec;54(6):1922-1934. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27688. Epub 2021 May 8.
7
Inter-reader reliability of CT Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System according to imaging analysis methodology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CT 肝脏成像报告和数据系统的读者间可靠性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Sep;31(9):6856-6867. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07815-y. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
8
Imaging-based diagnosis of benign lesions and pseudolesions in the cirrhotic liver.基于影像学的肝硬化肝脏良性病变和假瘤的诊断。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Jan;75:9-20. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.09.008. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
9
The Dissemination of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis Guidelines Using the Method of Teaching the Teachers.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Nov;17(11):1491-1495. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.06.030. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
10
Cancer burden of major cancers in China: A need for sustainable actions.中国主要癌症的癌症负担:需要采取可持续行动。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2020 May;40(5):205-210. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12025. Epub 2020 May 2.