Lunit, 4th to 8th floors, 374, Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jan 30;24(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11897-4.
While immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (Chemo-IO) is generally recognized for providing superior outcomes compared to monotherapy (mono-IO), it is associated with a higher incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), which may lead to treatment discontinuation. In this study, we compared the rates of treatment discontinuation between mono-IO and Chemo-IO as first-line treatments for various solid tumors.
We systematically reviewed clinical trials from databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and an additional source) published from January 1, 2018, to July 10, 2023. We included phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that utilized immunotherapy agents in at least one arm as first-line treatments for a variety of solid tumors. Data extraction followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) extension statement for network meta-analysis. A random effects model was used for the network meta-analysis, with the risk of bias assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool II. The primary outcomes encompassed treatment discontinuation rates due to TRAEs among patients who underwent immunotherapy, either alone or combined with chemotherapy, for various solid tumors. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare between treatment groups.
From 29 RCTs, a total of 21,677 patients and 5 types of treatment were analyzed. Compared to mono-IO, Chemo-IO showed a significantly higher rate of discontinuation due to TRAEs (RR 2.68, 95% CI 1.98-3.63). Subgroup analysis for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients also exhibited a greater risk of discontinuation due to TRAEs with Chemo-IO compared to mono-IO (RR 2.93, 95% CI 1.67-5.14). Additional analyses evaluating discontinuation rates due to either treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) or AEs regardless of causality (any AEs) consistently revealed an elevated risk associated with Chemo-IO.
Chemo-IO was associated with an elevated risk of treatment discontinuation not only due to TRAEs but also any AEs or TEAEs. Given that the treatment duration can impact clinical outcomes, a subset of patients might benefit more from mono-IO than combination therapy. Further research is imperative to identify and characterize this subset.
免疫疗法联合化疗(Chemo-IO)通常被认为比单药免疫疗法(mono-IO)提供更好的疗效,但它与更高的治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)发生率相关,这可能导致治疗中断。在这项研究中,我们比较了 mono-IO 和 Chemo-IO 作为各种实体瘤一线治疗的停药率。
我们系统地检索了 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 7 月 10 日数据库(PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和另一个来源)发表的临床试验。我们纳入了至少在一个臂中使用免疫治疗药物作为各种实体瘤一线治疗的 III 期随机对照试验(RCTs)。数据提取遵循网络荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)扩展声明。使用随机效应模型进行网络荟萃分析,使用 Cochrane 风险偏倚工具 II 评估风险偏倚。主要结局是接受免疫治疗的患者(单独或联合化疗)因 TRAEs 导致的停药率,涵盖各种实体瘤。计算治疗组之间比较的治疗停止率的汇总相对风险(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
从 29 项 RCT 中,共分析了 21677 名患者和 5 种治疗方法。与 mono-IO 相比,Chemo-IO 因 TRAEs 导致停药的发生率显著更高(RR 2.68,95%CI 1.98-3.63)。对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的亚组分析也表明,与 mono-IO 相比,Chemo-IO 因 TRAEs 导致停药的风险更高(RR 2.93,95%CI 1.67-5.14)。进一步评估因治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAEs)或无论因果关系如何的不良事件(任何 AEs)导致的停药率的分析一致表明,Chemo-IO 相关风险升高。
Chemo-IO 不仅因 TRAEs,而且因任何 AEs 或 TEAEs 导致停药的风险增加。鉴于治疗持续时间可能会影响临床结局,一部分患者可能从 mono-IO 而非联合治疗中获益更多。需要进一步研究以确定和描述这一部分患者。