Suppr超能文献

超越单纯的尊重:医疗保健工作场所学习中尊严的新视角。

Beyond mere respect: new perspectives on dignity for healthcare workplace learning.

作者信息

Klinner Christiane, Dario Amabile Borges, Bell Amani, Nisbet Gillian, Penman Merrolee, Monrouxe Lynn V

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 16;10:1274364. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1274364. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although dignity in workplace learning in healthcare is gathering interest, we know little about stakeholders' conceptualizations in this area across professional groups. Dignity breaches in workplace learning are common, often with serious and long-lasting consequences for the affected. Conceptualizations shape behaviours and experiences. To prevent dignity violations in students' learning, it is thus important to understand stakeholders' understandings of the topic. This study therefore explores the dignity conceptualizations around workplace learning that students, placement educators and university staff hold across seven allied health professional groups.

METHODS

Using a social constructionist perspective, we conducted individual and group narrative interviews ( = 51) with students, placement educators and university workplace learning staff from seven allied health professional groups. We used the 5-step Framework Analysis to explore and develop themes, identifying differences and similarities across stakeholder groups.

RESULTS

We identified eight distinct, yet interrelated, dimensions of dignity from participants' narratives: dignity as respect, dignity as self-x (the various relationships we have with ourselves), dignity as feeling safe, dignity as understanding otherness, dignity as supporting others, dignity as equality, dignity as professionalism, and dignity as belonging. Dignity as respect was identified across all participants, although mutual respect and a culture of respect were only present in academic participants' talk. The remaining seven dimensions all present important factors extending our understanding of the construct of dignity.

DISCUSSION

In line with existing research, our study identifies the absence of an unambiguous, positive conceptualization of dignity in workplace learning among stakeholders. It adds novelty in two ways: by identifying dignity dimensions that require informed action beyond respecting others, and by revealing a tension between dignity as professionalism and dignity as equality. We suggest revising existing dignity concepts in workplace learning to address this tension and to reinforce that active care, team integration and skilled support are all non-negotiable elements of dignified behaviour within workplace learning.

摘要

引言

尽管医疗保健领域工作场所学习中的尊严问题正日益受到关注,但我们对不同专业群体在这一领域的利益相关者概念化了解甚少。工作场所学习中的尊严侵犯现象很常见,往往会给受影响者带来严重且持久的后果。概念化塑造行为和体验。因此,为防止学生学习过程中的尊严侵犯,了解利益相关者对该主题的理解非常重要。本研究旨在探讨七个联合健康专业群体的学生、实习教育工作者和大学工作人员对工作场所学习中尊严的概念化理解。

方法

我们采用社会建构主义视角,对七个联合健康专业群体的学生、实习教育工作者和大学工作场所学习人员进行了个人和小组叙事访谈(n = 51)。我们使用五步框架分析法来探索和发展主题,确定不同利益相关者群体之间的差异和相似之处。

结果

我们从参与者的叙述中确定了尊严的八个不同但相互关联的维度:作为尊重的尊严、作为自我x(我们与自己的各种关系)的尊严、作为感到安全的尊严、作为理解他者的尊严、作为支持他人的尊严、作为平等的尊严、作为专业精神的尊严和作为归属感的尊严。所有参与者都认同作为尊重的尊严,尽管相互尊重和尊重文化仅出现在学术参与者的谈话中。其余七个维度都提出了重要因素,扩展了我们对尊严概念的理解。

讨论

与现有研究一致,我们的研究发现利益相关者在工作场所学习中缺乏对尊严的明确、积极的概念化。它在两个方面具有新颖性:通过确定需要采取明智行动的尊严维度,而不仅仅是尊重他人;通过揭示作为专业精神的尊严和作为平等的尊严之间的紧张关系。我们建议修订工作场所学习中现有的尊严概念,以解决这种紧张关系,并强调积极关怀、团队融合和熟练支持都是工作场所学习中尊严行为的不可协商要素。

相似文献

8

本文引用的文献

1
Dignity of Nursing Students in Clinical Learning Environments.护理学生在临床学习环境中的尊严。
Nurs Ethics. 2022 May;29(3):742-757. doi: 10.1177/09697330211041735. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
2
Patient's Dignity: Viewpoints of Patients and Nurses in Hospitals.患者尊严:医院患者和护士的观点。
Hosp Top. 2021 Oct-Dec;99(4):187-197. doi: 10.1080/00185868.2021.1897487. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
3
Dignity in nursing: A synthesis review of concept analysis studies.护理中的尊严:概念分析研究的综合综述。
Nurs Ethics. 2021 Aug;28(5):734-749. doi: 10.1177/0969733020961822. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
9
When I say … quantification in qualitative research.当我说……定性研究中的量化。
Med Educ. 2020 Mar;54(3):186-187. doi: 10.1111/medu.14010. Epub 2019 Dec 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验