Gaetani Melany, Parshuram Christopher S, Redelmeier Donald A
Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Research Institute Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Front Pediatr. 2024 Jan 16;11:1306498. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1306498. eCollection 2023.
Furosemide is the most commonly used medication in pediatric intensive care. Growing data indicates improved hemodynamic stability and efficacy of furosemide infusions compared to intermittent injections, thereby suggesting furosemide infusions might be considered as first line therapy in critically ill, paediatric patients. The objective of this study is to examine furosemide treatment as either continuous infusions or intermittent injections and subsequent patient outcomes.
This is a retrospective cohort analysis of patients treated in a pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) over a nine year period (July 31st 2006 and July 31, 2015). Eligible patients were admitted to either the general pediatric or cardiac specific ICU for a duration of at least 6 hours and who received intravenous furosemide treatment.
A total of 7,478 patients were identified who received a total of 118,438 furosemide administrations for a total of 113,951 (96%) intermittent doses and 4,487 (4%) infusions running for a total of 1,588,750 hours. A total of 5,996 (80%) patients received exclusively furosemide injections and 1,482 (20%) patients received at least one furosemide infusion. A total of 193 patients died during ICU admission, amounting to 87 (6%) of the 1,482 patients who received an infusion and 106 (2%) of the 5,996 who received intermittent injections. Multivariable regression analysis showed no statistically significant decrease in adjusted mortality for patients who received furosemide injections compared to furosemide infusions (aOR 1.20, CI 0.76-1.89).
This retrospective study observed similar mortality for patients who received furosemide infusions compared to furosemide injections. More research on furosemide in the ICU could provide insights on fluid management, drug effectiveness, and pharmacologic stewardship for critically ill children.
呋塞米是儿科重症监护中最常用的药物。越来越多的数据表明,与间歇性注射相比,呋塞米静脉输注可改善血流动力学稳定性和疗效,因此提示呋塞米静脉输注可被视为重症儿科患者的一线治疗方法。本研究的目的是研究呋塞米连续输注或间歇性注射治疗及其对患者预后的影响。
这是一项对在儿科重症监护病房(ICU)接受治疗9年(2006年7月31日至2015年7月31日)的患者进行的回顾性队列分析。符合条件的患者入住普通儿科或心脏专科ICU至少6小时,并接受静脉注射呋塞米治疗。
共确定7478例患者,共接受118438次呋塞米给药,其中113951次(96%)为间歇性剂量,4487次(4%)为静脉输注,总时长为1588750小时。共有5996例(80%)患者仅接受呋塞米注射,1482例(20%)患者至少接受1次呋塞米静脉输注。共有193例患者在ICU住院期间死亡,其中接受静脉输注的1482例患者中有87例(6%),接受间歇性注射的5996例患者中有106例(2%)。多变量回归分析显示,与接受呋塞米静脉输注的患者相比,接受呋塞米注射的患者校正死亡率无统计学显著降低(调整后比值比1.20,可信区间0.76-1.89)。
这项回顾性研究观察到,接受呋塞米静脉输注的患者与接受呋塞米注射的患者死亡率相似。对ICU中呋塞米的更多研究可为危重症儿童的液体管理、药物疗效和药物管理提供见解。